Short Antibiotic Treatment Versus Duration Guided by Markers of Inflammation in the Treatment of AECOPD (AECOPD)

November 5, 2020 updated by: Pr. Semir Nouira, University of Monastir

Evaluation of Two Strategies of Antibiotic Treatment With Levofloxacin in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Short Treatment-versus Treatment Guided by Markers of Inflammation

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common diseases in the world. In a recent study, we showed that administration of levofloxacin is superior to placebo in the treatment of decompensation of COPD; it is accompanied by a substantial reduction in mortality and a significant reduction in the residence time in hospital.

In Tunisia, few data are available on the epidemiology of COPD decompensation. The choice of antibiotic to be used in this situation is challenging to the clinician who must choose between traditional antibiotics (cyclins, aminopenicillins, cotrimoxazole...) and new antimicrobial agents. Recently, it has been emphasized the selection of patients for treatment according to the degree of systemic inflammation (C-Reactive Protein). Indeed, there would have a correlation between the tracheobronchial infection and elevated inflammatory markers. As the elevation of these markers is proportional to the intensity of the inflammatory reaction of the body, is based on the kinetics of these biomarkers in antibiotic treatment seems logical. Thus, C-Reactive Protein allowed not only knowing when to start antibiotics, but also through their kinetic, these markers can guide the duration of therapy and shorten the duration of antibiotic therapy: a rate cut would ensure that the antibiotic treatment was adopted. Available guidelines stated that antibiotic treatment should be maintained at an average of 7 to 10 days while some studies showed no clinical inferiority of courses as short as 3 days. Further reduction of the duration of antibiotherapy was even suggested in order to reduce the risk of adverse events and the pressure that drives bacterial resistance. Hence, we conducted this study using an algorithm to comprehensively evaluate the role of CRP-guided antibiotic prescription in optimizing treatment duration in AECOPD.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, randomized, double blind controlled study including patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with AECOPD. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive treatment either according to guidance based on serum CRP level (CRP-guided group) or the standard of care (control group). The randomisation sequence was generated using the sealed envelope sequence generator stratified according to investigator site. Online inclusion of patients according to the concealed sequence was done with an independent, centralised web-based system (DACIMA Tunisia; https://www.dacimasoftware.com).

Patients were assigned to one of the two treatment arms:

  1. the intervention (CRP-guided) group: 500 mg (one tablet) of oral levofloxacin daily of levofloxacin for 7 days unless the serum CRP decrease by at least 50% from baseline value. Measurements of serum CRP were done at ED admission, at day-2, day-4 and day-6 and made available to the attending physicians.
  2. the standard care (control) group: 500 mg of levofloxacin per day for the first two days. Thereafter, oral tablet of placebo was prescribed according to CRP values as in CRP guided group to keep the blindness of the study. Also, in order to ensure blinding, active drug as well as placebo tablets were encapsulated for identical appearance and placed in sealed envelopes.

The study is approved by ethics committees of all participating centers prior to implementation, and all included patients provided their written informed consent. The study was. The study protocol has been prepared in accordance with the revised Helsinki Declaration for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects and Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.

After verification of inclusion and exclusion criteria as well the informed consent, demographic, clinical and biological data were collected at baseline. These included patient comorbidities, number of exacerbations in the past year, physical examination findings, blood gas analysis, and standard laboratory tests results. Expectorated sputum samples were collected for pathogen culture. All data were recorded in standardized electronic case report forms. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 20.0.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

310

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Monastir, Tunisia, 5000
        • Emergency department of university hospital Fattouma Bourguiba of Monastir

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

41 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients having COPD (according to the definition of the American Thoracic Society) in acute exacerbation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • clinical evidence of hemodynamic compromise with the need for vasoactive drugs
  • immediate need for mechanical ventilation,
  • Glasgow Coma scale <12,
  • pneumonia,
  • previous adverse reactions to the study drug,
  • antibiotic treatment in the previous days,
  • pregnancy or lactation,
  • severe renal (creatinine clearance 40 mL/min) or hepatic impairment,
  • lung disease other than COPD that could affect the clinical evaluation of the treatments. --active alcohol or drug abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The intervention (CRP-guided) group
500 mg (one tablet) of oral levofloxacin daily of levofloxacin for 7 days unless the serum CRP decrease by at least 50% from baseline value. Measurements of serum CRP were done at ED admission, at day-2, day-4 and day-6 and made available to the attending physicians.
One tablet per day for 7days.
Other Names:
  • Placebo Levofloxacin 500mg
Experimental: The standard care (control) group
500 mg of levofloxacin per day for the first two days. Thereafter, oral tablet of placebo was prescribed according to CRP values as in CRP guided group to keep the blindness of the study.
One tablet per day for 7days.
Other Names:
  • Placebo Levofloxacin 500mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cure rate
Time Frame: 1 year after starting protocol
By hospital Data and telephonic calling.
1 year after starting protocol

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of additional antibiotherapy course
Time Frame: one week
The frequency of additional antibiotherapy course indicated to treat COPD patients during the hospital stay.
one week
rate of admission in the intensive care unit
Time Frame: one week
By hospital Data and telephonic calling.
one week
exacerbation rate
Time Frame: 1 year after starting protocol
By hospital Data and telephonic calling.
1 year after starting protocol
exacerbation free interval
Time Frame: 1year after starting protocol
rate of admission in the intensive care unit
1year after starting protocol

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Semir Nouira, professor, Research Laboratory (LR12SP18) University of Monastir 5000 Tunisia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Levofloxacin 500mg

Subscribe