Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Atacicept (Long-term Follow-Up of Participant Who Participated in ADDRESS II)

March 19, 2019 updated by: EMD Serono

A Phase IIb, Multi-Center, Long-Term Extension Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Atacicept in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Who Completed Protocol EMR-700461-023 (ADDRESS II)

This is a multicenter, double-blind, Phase 2b, long-term extension (LTE) to the ADDRESS II core trial (EMR 700461-023) (NCT01972568), to evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of atacicept in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Participants who completed the 24-week core study ADDRESS II core study (NCT01972568) and thus not met any of the discontinuation criteria were invited to enter this long-term extension (LTE) study NCT02070978.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

253

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1015ABO
        • Organizacion Medica de Investigacion (OMI)
      • Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1426AAL
        • Atencion Integral en Reumatologia (AIR)
      • Ciudad Autonoma Buenos aires, Argentina, C1046AAQ
        • APRILLUS
      • Cordoba, Argentina, X5016KEH
        • Hospital Privado Centro Medico de Cordoba
      • Salta, Argentina, A4400ANW
        • Cordis S.A.
      • San Juan, Argentina, 5400
        • Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Inv. Clinica CER
    • Santa Fe
      • Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, S2000PBJ
        • Instituto CAICI
    • Tucuman
      • San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina, T4000AXL
        • Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia
      • San Miguel de Tucuman, Tucuman, Argentina, T4000ICL
        • Investigaciones Clínicas Tucumán
      • San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucuman, Argentina, T4000DVB
        • Centro Integral de Reumatologia
    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90035-170
        • Centro de Pesquisas em Diabetes Ltda.
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4002
        • MHAT "Eurohospital" - Plovdiv, OOD
      • Ruse, Bulgaria, 7002
        • MHAT - Ruse, AD
      • Ruse, Bulgaria, 7000
        • Medical Center "Teodora", EOOD
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1431
        • UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski", EAD
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1750
        • DCC "Sveta Anna", EOOD
      • Stara Zagora, Bulgaria, 6000
        • Medical Center "Nov Rehabilitatsionen Tsentar", EOOD
      • Targovishte, Bulgaria, 7700
        • MHAT-Targovishte, AD
      • Osorno, Chile, 5290000
        • Corporacion de Beneficencia Osorno
      • Puerto Varas, Chile, 5550170
        • Quantum Research Santiago
      • Santiago, Chile, 7501126
        • Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos
      • Santiago, Chile, 7500000
        • Centro Medico Prosalud
      • Santiago, Chile, 7500710
        • Biomedica
      • Viña del Mar, Chile
        • CINVEC - Centro de Investigacion Clinica V Region
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 128 50
        • Revmatologicky Ustav
      • Uherske Hradiste, Czechia, 686 01
        • Revmatologicka ambulance
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin - Campus Charite Mitte
    • Rheinland Pfalz
      • Mainz, Rheinland Pfalz, Germany, 55131
        • Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
      • Milano, Italy, 20122
        • Fondazione Irccs Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05030
        • Konkuk University Medical Center
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 110744
        • Seoul National University Hospital
      • Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 16499
        • Ajou University Hospital
      • Chihuahua, Mexico, 31000
        • Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua, S.C.
    • Coahuila
      • Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico, 25000
        • Hospital Universitario de Saltillo "Dr. Gonzalo Valdés Valdés"
    • Distrito Federal
      • Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico, 06700
        • Clinstile, S.A. de C.V.
    • Guanajuato
      • Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico, 37000
        • Morales Vargas Centro de Investigacion, S.C.
    • Jalisco
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44600
        • Icle S.C.
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44620
        • Unidad de Investigacion en Enfermedades Cronico Degenerativas SC
    • Michoacán
      • Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico, 58249
        • Clínica de Enfermedades Crónicas y de Procedimientos Especiales, S.C.
    • Nuevo León
      • Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64000
        • Accelerium S. de R.L. de C.V.
    • Yucatán
      • Merida, Yucatán, Mexico, 97130
        • Centro Multidisciplinario para el Desarrollo Especializado de la Investigacion Clinica en Yucatan
      • Arequipa, Peru, 00000
        • Hogar Clínica San Juan de Dios - Arequipa
      • Lima, Peru, Lima 31
        • Clinica Medica Cayetano Heredia
      • Lima, Peru, Lima 33
        • Invest Clinicas Sac Inst de Ginecologia y Reproduccion
      • Angeles City, Pampanga, Philippines, 2009
        • Angeles University Foundation Medical Center
      • Batangas, Philippines, 4127
        • Mary Mediatrix Medical Center
      • Davao, Philippines, 8000
        • Davao Doctors Hospital
      • Iloilo, Philippines, 5000
        • Iloilo Doctors Hospital
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85-168
        • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im.dr J. Biziela
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119992
        • FSBEI HE " First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov" of the MoH of the RF
      • Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation, 185019
        • SBIH of Republic Kareliya "Republican Hospital n.a. V.A. Baranov"
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 190068
        • SPb SBIH "Clinical Rheumatological Hospital # 25"
      • Saratov, Russian Federation, 410039
        • SIH "Saratov City Clinical Hospital # 12"
      • Vladimir, Russian Federation, 600023
        • SBIH of Vladimir region "Regional Clinical Hospital"
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150003
        • SBHI of Yaroslavl Region "Clinical Hospital # 8"
    • KwaZulu-Natal
      • Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, 4319
        • Naidoo, A
    • Western Cape
      • Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa, 7600
        • Winelands Medical Research Centre
      • Valladolid, Spain, 47005
        • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
    • Essex
      • Romford, Essex, United Kingdom, RM7 0AG
        • Queen's Hospital
    • Greater London
      • London, Greater London, United Kingdom, NW1 2PG
        • University College London Hospitals
      • London, Greater London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
        • Guy's Hospital
    • Alabama
      • Anniston, Alabama, United States, 36207
        • Pinnacle Research Group LLC
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham - (UAB)
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Wallace Rheumatic Study Center
      • Fontana, California, United States, 92335
        • Southern California Permenent Medical Group
      • San Leandro, California, United States, 94578
        • East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group, Inc.
    • Florida
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33765
        • Clinical Research of West Florida - Corporate
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33603
        • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33613
        • McIlwain Medical Group, PA
    • Michigan
      • Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States, 48439
        • AA MRC LLC Ahmed Arif Medical Research Center
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63117
        • Clayton Medical Associates, P.C.
    • New Jersey
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103
        • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11031
        • The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28210
        • DJL Clinical Research, PLLC
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
        • MetroHealth System
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • OMRF
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73103
        • Arthritis & Rheumatology Center of Oklahoma
    • Pennsylvania
      • Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States, 19610
        • Clinical Research Center of Reading LLC
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • Austin Regional Clinic, P.A.
      • Waco, Texas, United States, 76708
        • Little River Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who had completed the 24-week treatment period of study EMR-700461-023 (ADDRESS II core trial)
  • Women of childbearing potential who had a negative pregnancy test
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria were applied

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active neurological symptoms of SLE that were deemed severe or progressive
  • Diagnosis of any demyelinating disease, such as, but not restricted to, multiple sclerosis (MS) or optic neuritis
  • Pregnancy
  • Active clinically significant viral, bacterial, or fungal infection, or any major episode of infection that in the investigator's opinion makes the participants unsuitable to continued participation in the study
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria were applied

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Atacicept 75 mg
Participants who received atacicept 75 milligram (mg) as once-weekly subcutaneous injection in the core study ADDRESS II continued to receive this dose during this LTE study. Participants in this reporting arm received the medication up to a maximum of 143.7 weeks.
Experimental: Atacicept 150 mg
Participants who received placebo in the core study ADDRESS II switched to receive atacicept 150 mg as once-weekly subcutaneous injection for up to a maximum of 97.7 weeks during this LTE study.
Participants who received atacicept 150 mg in core study ADDRESS II continued to receive atacicept 150 mg as once-weekly subcutaneous injection during this LTE study up to a maximum of 97.9 weeks.
Experimental: Placebo/Atacicept 150 mg
Participants who received placebo in the core study ADDRESS II switched to receive atacicept 150 mg as once-weekly subcutaneous injection for up to a maximum of 97.7 weeks during this LTE study.
Participants who received atacicept 150 mg in core study ADDRESS II continued to receive atacicept 150 mg as once-weekly subcutaneous injection during this LTE study up to a maximum of 97.9 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Treatment Period
Time Frame: Baseline (LTE Day 1) up to maximum treatment duration of 143.7 weeks
An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. An AE was considered as 'treatment emergent' if it occurred after the first drug administration of each period or if it was present prior to drug administration but exacerbated after the drug administration. Treatment- Emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the treatment period exclude those ongoing at the time of study entry into 024 LTE Day 1 and exclude the safety follow-up period.
Baseline (LTE Day 1) up to maximum treatment duration of 143.7 weeks
Number of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued the Treatment Due to Adverse Event (AE)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Core study) up to maximum duration of 167.7 weeks
An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. TEAEs were defined as events with an onset date on or after the date of first dose of study treatment in the core study and ongoing at the 024 LTE study entry, occurring during the 024 LTE study and the Safety follow-up Period.
Baseline (Day 1 of Core study) up to maximum duration of 167.7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage Index Organ Damage Scores
Time Frame: Baseline: Day 1 (Core Study), Day 1 (LTE Study), Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
SLICC/ACR score or damage index evaluates cumulative damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). These changes may or may not be related to SLE. Most items are scored only if they have been present for at least 6 months. Scores range from 0 to 47 points, with higher scores indicating greater cumulative damage. Baseline was defined as Day 1 of Core study.
Baseline: Day 1 (Core Study), Day 1 (LTE Study), Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 Score
Time Frame: Baseline: Core study Screening, LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
BILAG Disease Activity Index evaluates systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity in 8 organ system domains: General, mucocutaneous, neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, vasculitis, renal, and hematologic using a separate alphabetic score (A to E) assigned to each organ system defined as follows. BILAG A: Severe disease activity; BILAG B: moderate disease activity; BILAG C: mild disease; BILAG D: system previously affected but now inactive; BILAG E: system never involved. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). The total BILAG score is the sum of the scores of the 8 domains where A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, and E=0. The total score ranges from 0 to 72 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity.
Baseline: Core study Screening, LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score
Time Frame: Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). Baseline was defined as core study screening visit.
Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by SLEDAI-2K Responder Index-50 (SRI-50) Score
Time Frame: Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
SRI-50 index was derived from SLEDAI-2K and could capture 50% or better improvement in each descriptor between any 2 visits in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) participants when there was incomplete resolution. The new assigned scores for the descriptors of SRI-50 were derived by dividing the score of each SLEDAI-2K descriptor by 2. SLEDAI-2K was an activity index that measured disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K used a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms. Each symptom present was assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranged from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms).
Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score
Time Frame: Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
The PGA was used to quantify disease activity and was measured using an anchored visual analog scale (VAS). The participant's current disease activity assessed by investigator in the score range of 0 to 3. Where 0=none; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. The assessment made relative not to the participant's most severe state, but the most severe state of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) per the investigator's assessment. Baseline was defined as core study screening visit.
Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Number of Participants Who Achieved SLE Responder Index (SRI-4) Response (a Disease Activity Composite Index)
Time Frame: Baseline: Core study Screening; LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA). SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms).
Baseline: Core study Screening; LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Number of Participants Who Achieved BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (a Disease Activity Composite Index)
Time Frame: Baseline: Core study Screening; LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
The BICLA response was defined as BILAG-2004 improvement (all screening visit BILAG A improving to B/C/D, all screening visit BILAG B to C/D, and less than or equal to (<=1) new BILAG B and no new BILAG A); no deterioration in SLEDAI total score; PGA increase by less than (<) 0 percentage (%) (defined as less then (<)0.3 point increase for the statistical analyses) and no non-permitted medication/treatment. Baseline was defined as core study screening visit.
Baseline: Core study Screening; LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Percent Change From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid Dose
Time Frame: Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Baseline: Screening Visit (Core Study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Core Study Day 1); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) is based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0-100 (100=highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100=highest level of physical functioning).
Baseline (Core Study Day 1); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Core Study Day 1); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, and Week 96
The LupusQoL was a lupus-specific health related QoL (HRQoL) questionnaire consisting of 34 items grouped in 8 domains: physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image, and fatigue. Participants indicate their responses on a 5-point Likert response format, where 4 = never, 3 = occasionally, 2 = a good bit of the time, 1 = most of the time, and 0 = all of the time. Summary scores can be calculated for all 8 domains. A LupusQoL score for each domain was reported on a 0 to 100 scale, with greater values indicating better HRQoL. Baseline was defined as Day 1 of core study.
Baseline (Core Study Day 1); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, and Week 96
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Baseline (Core Study Day 1); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
The PGIC is self-rated scale that asks the participant to describe the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall Quality of life (QoL) related to the participant's painful condition on the following scale: 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in the PGIC categories of very much improved (1) and much improved (2) are reported.
Baseline (Core Study Day 1); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5 Dimension Instrument (EQ-5D) Score
Time Frame: Baseline: Day 1 (Core Study), LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
EQ-5D questionnaire comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression measured on 3 levels; 1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3=extreme problems. This part, called the EQ-5D descriptive system, provides a 5-dimensional description of health status. 5 dimensional 3-level system was converted into single index utility score. Possible values for single index utility score ranged from -0.594 (severe problems in all dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in all dimensions) on scale where 1 represented best possible health state. Baseline was defined as Day 1 of Core study.
Baseline: Day 1 (Core Study), LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline: Day 1 (Core Study), LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
EQ-5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeters (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Baseline defined as Day 1 of core study.
Baseline: Day 1 (Core Study), LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score
Time Frame: Baseline: Day 1 (Core study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.
Baseline: Day 1 (Core study); LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 96
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Core study) up to maximum duration of 167.7 weeks
An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. Treatment-Emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as events with an onset date on or after the date of first dose of study treatment in the core study and ongoing at LTE study entry, or occurring during LTE study.
Baseline (Day 1 of Core study) up to maximum duration of 167.7 weeks
Number of Participants With Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Time Frame: LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 98
The C-SSRS assesses the suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation in participants. Occurrence of suicidal behavior after study entry is defined as having answered "yes" to a least 1 of the 4 suicidal behavior subcategories (actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior). Occurrence of suicidal ideation is defined as having answered "yes" to at least 1 of the suicidal ideation sub-categories (1) wish to be dead, (2) nonspecific active suicidal thoughts, (3) active suicidal ideation with any methods (no plan) without intent to act, (4) active suicidal ideation with some intent to act (without specific plan), and (5) active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent).
LTE Day 1, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72 and Week 98

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 29, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 9, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 700461-024
  • 2013-002758-62 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Clinical Trials on Atacicept 75 mg

3
Subscribe