- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02086643
The Retroclavicular Approach for Regional Anesthesia of the Upper Limb in Obese Patients
The Retroclavicular Approach for Regional Anesthesia of the Upper Limb in Patients With BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 : A Descriptive Study
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Classic infraclavicular approach of the brachial plexus involves a needle puncture below the clavicle and advancing the needle with a 45-60 degree angle from cephalad to caudad. The aim is to advanced the block needle posterior to the axillary artery and to deposit the local anesthetic at that point, near the posterior cord. A "U" shaped spread around the artery should ensure distribution around all three cords. Ultrasound guidance is highly recommended and neurostimulation is optional.
The retroclavicular approach is a variant to this classical technique. Ultrasound probe is positioned initially below the clavicle in a manner similar to the classic approach but is then rotated in a clockwise fashion (right arm) or counter-clockwise fashion (left arm) for about 25-35 degrees. The puncture site is just behind the clavicle at the most lateral point available. If initial entry point is optimal, needle direction is then parallel to ultrasound probe. The final aim and position of block needle is identical to classical approach. Entry point ensures a parallel alignment of the needle and the ultrasound beam, thus enabling almost perfect visualization of both artery, cords and block needle. This is turn optimizes safety, rapidity of technique, efficiency and efficacy.
It is recognized that regional anesthesia is more difficult to perform in obese patients. Anatomic landmarks are harder to localize in this population and ultrasound guidance is more difficult because of the attenuation of the ultrasound beam by adipose tissue. The complication rate of regional techniques is also reported to be higher in the obese patient population.
Since the retroclavicular variant of the infraclavicular approach for the anesthesia of the brachial plexus offers a better needle visualisation, we believe that this technique can be used successfully in the obese patient population with a low complication rate.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1H 5N4
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Elective or Urgent Surgery of the hand, wrist or forearm
- 18 years and older
- Ability to consent
- American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 to 3
- BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria:
- Infection at the site of infection
- Abnormal anatomy at the site of infection
- Coagulopathy
- Severe Pulmonary Disease
- Preexisting neurological symptom(s) in the operated arm
- Pregnant patients
- Patients weighing less than 50 kg
- Allergy to amide type local anesthetics
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Retroclavicular block
|
Retroclavicular ultrasound guided nerve block with total injection of 40 ml of a mixture of 20 ml ropivacaine 0,5% (5 mg/ml) + 20 ml mepivacaine 1,5% (15 mg/ml) + epinephrine 1 : 400 000 (2,5 mcg/ml).
Incremental injections of 5 ml separated by an aspiration test.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Surgery completion under regional block
Time Frame: Success is defined at end of surgery for which block was done, generally within 1 to 3 hours after block is performed
|
Success rate is defined as the completion of the intended surgery under regional anesthesia with retroclavicular block without the need for a rescue technique.
These techniques are defined as: adding local anesthetic locally by surgeon, rescue intravenous narcotics in excess of 1 microgram per kilogram of patient weight, need for general anesthesia, rescue distal neural blockage by anesthesiologist.
Patient sedation with midazolam 1 to 2 mg IV or propofol perfusion up to 50 mcg/kg/min is allowed for patient comfort during the surgery and is not considered a rescue technique.
|
Success is defined at end of surgery for which block was done, generally within 1 to 3 hours after block is performed
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sensitive block progression
Time Frame: Assessed 10, 20 and 30 minutes after block completion
|
Progress of the sensory block in the distribution of the radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous, and medial cutaneous nerves of the forearm and hand at 10, 20 and 30 minutes after block completion (mepivacaine-ropivacaine mixed injection).
The scale used is: 0:no sensitive block, 1:analgesia (loss of pain but not tactile sensation), 2:anesthesia (loss of pain and tactile sensation).
|
Assessed 10, 20 and 30 minutes after block completion
|
Motor Block Progression
Time Frame: Assessed 10, 20, 30 minutes after the block
|
Progress of the motor block in the distribution of the radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous nerves of the forearm and hand at 10, 20, and 30 minutes after block completion (mepivacaine injection).
The scale used is: 0: no motor block, 1: paresis, 2: paralysis.
No units are attached to this scale
|
Assessed 10, 20, 30 minutes after the block
|
Technique duration
Time Frame: Time required in seconds for the retroclavicular block technique completion, generally under 15 minutes
|
Number of seconds needed to complete the block, from time of local skin anesthesia until regional block needle removal (local skin anesthesia plus injection of mepivacaine-ropivacaine mixture)
|
Time required in seconds for the retroclavicular block technique completion, generally under 15 minutes
|
Needle visualization
Time Frame: Assessed after study completion, once all 30 patients will have been completed. Assessment will take place in the first 4 weeks after all 30 patients have been recruited
|
Using the Likert standardized scale, two evaluators will individually quantify the ease of needle visualization using the video footage recorded by the ultrasound machine from all the retroclavicular blocks.
Likert scale for visualization, is defined as: 1:very bad, 2: bad, 3: adequate, 4:good, 5: very good.
|
Assessed after study completion, once all 30 patients will have been completed. Assessment will take place in the first 4 weeks after all 30 patients have been recruited
|
Patient discomfort
Time Frame: Assessed 1 minute after block completion
|
Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), patients will quantify the discomfort they experienced during the block.
This assessment will take place in the minutes following mepivacaine injection and block needle withdrawal.
The VAS scale is rated from 1-10, 1 being almost no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever.
|
Assessed 1 minute after block completion
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Assessed 48 hours after the block
|
Using a VAS, patients will quantify their satisfaction with the retroclavicular technique throughout the study period.
|
Assessed 48 hours after the block
|
Late Complication Rate
Time Frame: Assessed 48 hours after the block
|
With a phone call to the patient at 48 hours after injection of mepivacaine-ropivacaine mixture, complications will be searched for (pain at puncture site, paresthesia or paresis in the operated arm, signs of infection at puncture site such as redness or purulent discharge).
Response is classified as YES or NO.
No units attached to this scale.
If patient reports paresthesia or paresis, further questioning over the phone will determine which nerve or cord is involved.
|
Assessed 48 hours after the block
|
Duration of the Block's Effects
Time Frame: Assessed 48 hours after the block
|
Duration of the block will be evaluated using 3 criteria: patient's subjective opinion of when the block receded (time of the day), time at which first oral analgesia is taken, and time of first onset of pain.
Units involved is time (for example "3 pm".)
|
Assessed 48 hours after the block
|
Use of narcotic for tourniquet pain
Time Frame: Assessed while surgery in under process
|
If at any point during the surgery, patient complains of tourniquet pain, this will be noted as well as the analgesia given.
Units is time of pain ("3 pm") and analgesia given ("micrograms of fentanyl").
|
Assessed while surgery in under process
|
Rate of Neurostimulation Usage
Time Frame: Assessed during the block
|
At the discretion of the anesthesiologist performing the block, neurostimulation can be used to supplement ultrasound guidance.
This will be recorded as a YES or NO (neurostimulation used or not).
No units attached to this rate.
|
Assessed during the block
|
Failure because of poor ultrasound visualization
Time Frame: Assessed during the performance of the nerve block
|
If, for a given patient, during ultrasound guidance the anatomic structure are too poorly visualized to safely perform the block, no puncture will be attempted and the technique will be considered a failure; an alternative anesthesia technique will be proposed to the patient.
|
Assessed during the performance of the nerve block
|
Early Complication Rate
Time Frame: Assessed during block performance, throughout surgery and in the PACU. Generally during a period of 4-6 hours after block completion
|
Immediate and early complications (vascular puncture, pneumothorax, paresthesia during block performance, pain during infection of the local anesthetics, Horner's syndrome) will be assessed throughout the patient's stay in the OR and PACU.
Immediate and appropriate treatment will be provided if necessary.
|
Assessed during block performance, throughout surgery and in the PACU. Generally during a period of 4-6 hours after block completion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Pablo Echave, M.D., Université de Sherbrooke
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 13-175
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Overweight
-
University Hospital, LilleNational Research Agency, France; European Union; University of Lille Nord de... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingOverweight and Obesity | Overweight, Childhood | Overweight, Infant
-
University of AarhusThe Danish Dairy Research Foundation, Denmark; Sygekassernes HelsefondCompletedOverweight and Obesity | Overweight Adolescents | Metabolic DiseaseDenmark
-
University Hospital Bispebjerg and FrederiksbergUniversity of CopenhagenCompleted
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesUniversity of Southern California; Tufts Medical CenterActive, not recruitingOverweight and Obesity | Overweight AdolescentsUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRecruitingObesity | Overweight | Overweight and Obesity | Obese | Overweight or ObesityUnited States
-
Holbaek SygehusUniversity of Copenhagen; University of Florida; University of Minnesota; Hebrew... and other collaboratorsRecruitingChildhood Overweight and ObesityDenmark
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompleted
-
Institut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere VirgiliCompletedObesity, Childhood | Overweight and Obesity | Overweight, ChildhoodSpain
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedModerately Overweight IndividualsUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicinePatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Pennington Biomedical Research... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingOvernutrition | Nutrition Disorders | Overweight | Body Weight | Pediatric Obesity | Body Weight Changes | Childhood Obesity | Weight Gain | Adolescent Obesity | Obesity, Childhood | Overweight and Obesity | Overweight or Obesity | Overweight AdolescentsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Retroclavicular block
-
Hôpital du ValaisCompletedHand InjurySwitzerland
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCompletedPhrenic Nerve ParalysisUnited States
-
Université de SherbrookeCompletedDescribe Novel Approach to Brachial Plexus AnesthesiaCanada
-
Université de SherbrookeCompleted
-
Sohag UniversityCompleted
-
Antalya Training and Research HospitalCompletedDisorder of Upper ExtremityTurkey
-
Antalya Training and Research HospitalCompletedDisorder of Upper ExtremityTurkey
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityUnknownForearm Injuries | Hand Injuries
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalWithdrawnAnesthesia | Upper Extremity InjuryUnited States