Study of Efficacy and Safety of Bimagrumab in Patients After Hip Fracture Surgery

August 9, 2020 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 24-week Double-blind Treatment and 24-week Follow-up, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Phase IIa/IIb Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of i.v. Bimagrumab on Total Lean Body Mass and Physical Performance in Patients After Surgical Treatment of Hip Fracture

The purpose of this study was to assess if bimagrumab is safe and effective in patients with muscle wasting (atrophy) after hip fracture surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

251

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ciudad Autonoma de Bs As, Argentina, C1128AAF
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • South Australia
      • Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia, 5041
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Graz, Austria, 80 10
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Brugge, Belgium, 8000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Genk, Belgium, 3600
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Santiago, Chile, 838 0456
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Barranquilla, Colombia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Valle Del Cauca
      • Cali, Valle Del Cauca, Colombia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Praha 10, Czechia, 100 34
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Czech Republic
      • Brno, Czech Republic, Czechia, 66250
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, Czechia, 500 05
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pardubice, Czech Republic, Czechia, 532 03
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Plzen, Czech Republic, Czechia, 30450
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Praha 5, Czech Republic, Czechia, 150 06
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lille Cedex, France, 59037
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bad Abbach, Germany, 93077
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Magdeburg, Germany, 39110
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Würzburg, Germany, 97074
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1125
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1062
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hatvan, Hungary, 3000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Hyogo
      • Nishinomiya-city, Hyogo, Japan, 662-0918
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kanagawa
      • Kamakura-city, Kanagawa, Japan, 247-8533
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kochi
      • Kochi-city, Kochi, Japan, 780-8522
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kumamoto
      • Kumamoto-city, Kumamoto, Japan, 862-0976
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Okayama
      • Okayama city, Okayama, Japan, 701-1192
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Toyama
      • Toyama-City, Toyama, Japan, 939-8511
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Aguascalientes, Mexico, 20127
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • San Luis Potosi, Mexico, 78200
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 196143
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sestroretsk, Russian Federation, 197706
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • St.- Petersburg, Russian Federation, 190103
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150003
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28049
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Andalucia
      • Sevilla, Andalucia, Spain, 41014
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Catalunya
      • Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08035
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08036
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Genève 14, Switzerland, 1211
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 82445
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 33305
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34093
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Izmir, Turkey, 35040
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bath, United Kingdom, BA1 3NG
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85023
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • California
      • El Cajon, California, United States, 92020
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80210
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Georgia
      • Gainesville, Georgia, United States, 30501
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Must have X-ray confirmed successful hip fracture repair; Must have completed surgical wound healing; Ability to walk a specified distance with or without a walking aid; Must weigh at least 35 kg.

Exclusion Criteria:

Must not have history of any other lower limb fractures in the past 6 months; Must not have certain cardiovascular conditions; Must not have a chronic active infection (e.g. HIV, hepatitis B or C, etc); Must not have used high-dose corticosteroid medications for at least 3 months in the past year;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: bimagrumab 700 mg
Approximately 70 patients who met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with the bimagrumab high dose administered via intravenous infusion starting Day 1 until Week 20
Bimagrumab was administered as intravenous infusion starting on Day 1 until week 20.
Other Names:
  • BYM338
EXPERIMENTAL: bimagrumab 210 mg
Approximately 70 patients who met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with the bimagrumab medium dose administered via intravenous infusion starting Day 1 until Week 20
Bimagrumab was administered as intravenous infusion starting on Day 1 until week 20.
Other Names:
  • BYM338
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: placebo
Approximately 70 patients who met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria received matching placbo administered via intravenous infusion starting Day 1 until Week 20
Matching placebo was administered as intravenous infusion starting on Day 1 until week 20.
EXPERIMENTAL: Bimagrumab 70 mg
Approximately 35 patients who met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with bimagrumad low dose administered via intravenous infusion starting Day 1 until Week 20
Bimagrumab was administered as intravenous infusion starting on Day 1 until week 20.
Other Names:
  • BYM338

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total Lean Body Mass Measured by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) at Weeks 12 and 24
Time Frame: baseline, weeks 12 and 24
Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) of change from baseline in total LBM (kg) by treatment and visit To assess dose-response relationship of bimagrumab and facilitate an adequate dose selection for future phase III studies, without the need for supportive data from another dose-response finding study, at least three doses were required, ranging from a non-effective or minimally effective dose to a dose where maximal efficacy is expected. Original study was initiated with only two doses of bimagrumab, therefore, a lower dose arm of 70mg has been added to this study with Amendment 2, changing the randomization ratio from 1:1:1 to 2:1:2:2 to either placebo, bimagrumab 70mg, bimagrumab 210mg, or bimagrumab 700mg. Since the 70mg dose was expected to show suboptimal efficacy and fewer patients were randomized to this group, it was used only for dose response modelling and not for hypothesis testing. Consequently, no efficacy evaluations for the bimagrumab 70mg Arm were performed
baseline, weeks 12 and 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Gait Speed at Week 24 (Meters/Sec)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24

Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) of change from baseline in derived gait speed (m/sec) by treatment and visit

To assess dose-response relationship of bimagrumab and facilitate an adequate dose selection for future phase III studies, without the need for supportive data from another dose-response finding study, at least 3 doses were required, ranging from a non-effective or minimally effective dose to a dose where maximal efficacy is expected. Original study was initiated with only two doses of bimagrumab, therefore, a lower dose arm of 70mg was added to this study with Amendment 2, changing the randomization ratio from 1:1:1 to 2:1:2:2 to either placebo, bimagrumab 70mg, bimagrumab 210mg, or bimagrumab 700mg. Since the 70mg dose was expected to show suboptimal efficacy and fewer patients were randomized to this group, it was used only for dose response modelling and not for hypothesis testing. Consequently, no efficacy evaluations for the bimagrumab 70mg Arm were performed

Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Short Physical Performance Battery at Weeks 24
Time Frame: Week 24
MMRM change from baseline in total score by treatment & visit to Week 24 in physical performance measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) that evaluates lower extremity function. Score range is 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best) to assess dose-response relationship of bimagrumab & facilitate adequate dose selection for future phase III studies, without need for supportive data from another dose-response finding study, at least 3 doses were required, ranging from non- or minimally effective dose to a dose where maximal efficacy was expected. Original study was initiated with only 2 doses, therefore, lower 70mg arm was added to this study, changing randomization ratio from 1:1:1 to 2:1:2:2 to either placebo, bimagrumab 70mg, 210mg, or 700mg. Since 70mg dose was expected to show suboptimal efficacy, fewer patients were randomized to this group & it was used only for dose response modelling & not hypothesis testing. Consequently, no efficacy evaluation for 70mg were performed
Week 24
Incidence of Falls up to Week 48
Time Frame: Up to Week 48

Group falls rate

The frequency of having at least one fall up to Week 48 was summarized by treatment groups

Incidence of falls was calculated for each arm up to Week 48. The ratio of these fall rates versus Placebo were calculated and presented as the Falls Rate Ratio. As mentioned in comment 5.1 above, the Falls Rate Ratio for Placebo does not apply because it would entail comparing the group to itself

Up to Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 16, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 14, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Wasting (Atrophy) After Hip Fracture Surgery

Clinical Trials on bimagrumab

3
Subscribe