A Trial of Connecting to Promote Foster Teen Well-Being

July 29, 2019 updated by: Kevin Haggerty, University of Washington

A Trial of Connecting to Prevent Drug Abuse and Risky Behavior in Foster Teens

This study evaluates the efficacy of a self-directed parenting program called Connecting in reducing risk of substance use and other risky behaviors in young foster teens (ages 11-15). Half of the participants will receive services as usual from the foster system, while half will participate in the Connecting program. Connecting is a 10-week, self-directed parenting workbook with two digital video discs (DVDs). Families receive weekly telephone support as they complete the program.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

220

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98115
        • The Social Development Research Group, University of Washington

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Foster youth ages 11-15 years
  • In current placement 60+ days
  • In relative/suitable adult care, in licensed relative/suitable adult care, in licensed foster care, in dependency guardianship
  • Caregiver and teen speak English well enough to use the program manual and respond to survey questions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The teen has regularly used drugs or alcohol in the last 30 days
  • The teen has been involved in the criminal justice system
  • The placement is not viewed as stable
  • The caregiver is not committed to a long-term placement
  • The teen will not likely be in the placement for at least 6 months
  • Group home placements and behavioral rehabilitative services placements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Program group
This group receives the Connecting program with telephone support. It's anticipated the program will take up to 14 weeks to complete.
Connecting was adapted for use within the child welfare system from the Staying Connected With Your Teen program that has been demonstrated to prevent substance abuse, risky sexual behavior, and violence during adolescence.
Other Names:
  • Staying Connected With Your Teen
No Intervention: Comparison group
This group receives Children's Administration services as usual.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delay in drug use initiation
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
Monitoring the Future (Johnston et al., 2002). Communities that Care Youth Survey (CTC) (Hawkins & Catalano, 2004).
2 year follow up
Substance use frequency
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
Monitoring the Future (Johnston et al., 2002). Communities that Care Youth Survey (Hawkins & Catalano, 2004).
2 year follow up
Non-violent delinquent behavior frequency
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
Seattle Social Development Project (SSDP) (Hawkins et al., 1999). Raising Healthy Children (Catalano et al., 2005).
2 year follow up
Violent delinquent behavior frequency
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
Seattle Social Development Project (Hawkins et al., 1999).
2 year follow up
Delay in initiation of sexual activity
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (Center for Human Research, 2003). Sexual Risk and Behavior Attitudes and Self Efficacy Scale (Basen Enquist et al., 1996). Communities that Care Youth Survey (Hawkins & Catalano, 2004).
2 year follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Residential placement stability
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
Child Welfare Administrative Data
2 year follow up
Growth in caregiver/youth bonding
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Communities that Care Youth Survey (Hawkins & Catalano, 2004). Armsden & Greenberg (1987).
1 and 2 year follow up
Youth attitudes about HIV related risks
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Sexual Risk and Behavior Attitudes and Self Efficacy Scale (Basen Enquist et al.,1996)
1 and 2 year follow up
Youth attitudes favorable toward substance use
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Communities that Care Youth Survey (Hawkins & Catalano, 2004)
1 and 2 year follow up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opportunities for prosocial involvement in the family
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (Shelton et al., 1999)
1 and 2 year follow up
Problem solving skills (youth)
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Raising Healthy Children (Catalano et al., 2005)
1 and 2 year follow up
Refusal skills (youth)
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Seattle Social Development Project (1999)
1 and 2 year follow up
Children's coping
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
University of Washington Parenting Clinic (2001)
1 and 2 year follow up
Rewards and recognition in the family scale
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Raising Healthy Children (Catalano et al., 2005)
1 and 2 year follow up
Change in family guidelines
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (1999)
1 and 2 year follow up
Change in caregiver monitoring
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Parental Monitoring; Kerr and Stattin (2000). Raising Healthy Children monitoring scale (Catalano et al., 2005).
1 and 2 year follow up
Change in inconsistent discipline and consequences
Time Frame: 1 and 2 year follow up
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (Shelton et al., 1999)
1 and 2 year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • D012912S

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Relationship, Family (Foster)

Clinical Trials on Connecting

3
Subscribe