RELAX Surgical: Effects of Environmental Design on Pre-surgical Relaxation

October 26, 2015 updated by: Royal College of Music

Over 4.6 million operations are undertaken each year in England alone. Of these, many patients experience psychological distress, which has negative implications for patient recovery. Indeed, psychological stress, in particular both trait and state anxiety, anger and distress, has been linked with slower wound healing (Broadbent et al., 2003) and more complicated post-operative recovery (Johnston and Wallace, 1990).

However, pre-operative psychological interventions can have significant positive effects on components of of post-operative recovery (Navros et al., 2011; Weinman and Johnston, 1988). In particular, music has been studied in a series of randomised control trials as a way of reducing pre-surgical stress. Studies have shown the effects of music in reducing levels of stress hormones such as cortisol (Leardi et al., 2007) and reducing both heart rate and blood pressure, and have also found music to be more effective than benzodiazepine at reducing pre-surgical anxiety (Bringman et al., 2009).

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is a major surgical hospital, performing over 15,000 adult operations annually. Consequently, strategies to reduce patient anxiety and improve experience are amongst the hospital's priorities. A renovation of the Surgical Admissions Lounge is currently underway with plans to incorporate visual arts and music in waiting booths to relax and distract patients. When asked how relaxing they found the space, patients at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital involved in a public consultation rated the current unenhanced waiting area as 5.8/10, but 93% of patients said that relaxing music would help them feel less anxious. This project will test whether music and art in the SAL actively reduce adult patient stress compared to normal unenhanced waiting spaces, with a view to extending the arts interventions to other surgical waiting areas such as the day treatment centre if there are significant positive findings.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Stress can be measured via a number of methods, including both psychological and physiological. This study proposes to examine three signatures of stress in order to triangulate data and achieve a more comprehensive understanding of patients' stress response:

  1. Psychological - we will use validated psychological questionnaires including STAI to measure both trait and state anxiety. We will also be using a simple prospective time perception test and a Stroop test to assess whether patients' attention capacity.
  2. Physiological - We will use biosensors and bioharnesses to gather electrocardiogram (ECG) data in order to test the complexity loss hypothesis. This hypothesis states that the physiological responses of organisms under constraints (ageing, illness, stress) exhibit grossly reduced dynamics and lose the ability to adopt to the changes in the environment. We will examine whether patients exhibit these reduced dynamics as their operation approaches and whether the arts can be used to increase the complexity of their responses.
  3. Biological - we will take two small saliva (spit) samples from patients to test whether levels of stress hormones such as cortisol are elevated in patients, and whether other immune biomarkers such as pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-1 are reduced by pre-surgical stress but maintained when music and art are present. Previous research within the field of psychoneuroimmunology suggests that alterations in psychological stress levels have consequences for biological response (Ader, 2007).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SW10 9HS
        • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Awaiting an operation for which they will have to pass through the surgical admissions lounge.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Wearing of hearing aids (which would prevent participants from wearing the biosensors in their ears)
  • Severely impaired sight or hearing (to the level that would affect their ability to participate in the interventions)
  • A dementia that would compromise their ability to provide informed consent
  • A language barrier that prevents participants from being able to understand the PIS and provide informed consent.
  • Pre-surgical sedative administered either prior to or during participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Audio enhanced
Enhanced Clinical Environment: participants wait for their operation in the enhanced audio-visual booth.
Surgical booths containing artwork and calming background music.
Active Comparator: Other distraction method
Participants wait for their operation in a booth with another distraction such as the news on television
Such as newspaper, magazine or the news on television
No Intervention: Ordinary
Participants wait for their operation in an ordinary, unenhanced booth

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Decrease in complexity of physiological response shown from ECG data collected via biosensing electrodes
Time Frame: Over 30 - 90 minutes
Over 30 - 90 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reduction in stress hormones and Th1/Th2 shift in immune biomarkers measured in saliva samples
Time Frame: 30 - 90 minutes
30 - 90 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reduction in state anxiety measured in psychological scales
Time Frame: 30 - 90 minutes
30 - 90 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danilo Mandic, Imperial College London
  • Study Director: Aaron Williamon, Royal College of Music

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 3, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2015

Last Verified

October 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SAL1415

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Enhanced clinical environment

Subscribe