Evaluation of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Receiving a Prosthesis (Chondrolike)

August 21, 2018 updated by: Lille Catholic University

Association Between Preoperative Clinical Evaluation, Radiological Classifications and Histopathology in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Receiving a Prosthesis

Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee undergo visible joint changes in radiology and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tests, but also clinically and histologically. The area of greatest change is at the subchondral/cartilage bone junction.

Investigators will determine the association between preoperative clinical evaluation (IKDC and Womac scores), radiological classifications and histopathology.

In addition, the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis is being given major interest, and inflammation is closely linked with vascularization. It was recently demonstrated that dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could identify the subchondral bone marrow vascularization changes occurring in osteoarthritis in animals.

These changes appeared before cartilage lesions were visible and were correlated with osteoarthritis severity. Thus the opportunity to obtain an objective assessment of bone vascularization in non-invasive conditions in humans might help better understanding osteoarthritis pathophysiology and finding new biomarkers. Investigators hypothesized that, as in animals, DCE-MRI has the ability to identify subchondral bone marrow vascularization changes in human osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with knee osteoarthritis, classified Kellgren-Lawrence 3 or 4, with asymmetric femorotibial joint space narrowing, that need a knee prosthesis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with knee osteoarthritis, classified Kellgren-Lawrence 3 or 4, with asymmetric femorotibial joint space narrowing
  • Patients requiring a total knee prosthesis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a known progressive inflammatory pathology (rheumatoid arthritis,...).
  • Patients with previous surgery of the knee
  • Contra-indication for magnetic resonance imaging, chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min), contrast media allergy, orthopaedic hardware around the knee. Patients in whom motion artifacts impaired image analysis will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Knee osteoarthritis

Patients with knee osteoarthritis, classified Kellgren-Lawrence 3 or 4, with asymmetric femorotibial joint space narrowing that will follow a surgery for a prosthetic replacement of the knee wil follow the following interventions:

  • Clinical evaluation
  • Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Histological evaluation of the surgical piece
Functional scores for the pathological joint will be determined
Patients will be examined using a 3T MR scanner (MR 750W, General Electrics, Milwaukee, WI) with a dedicated knee coil. Subchondral bone marrow vascularization in medial and lateral femorotibial compartments will be assessed with DCE-MRI and lesions will be graded on MR images.
Upper tibial resection pieces will be collected and the vascularization will be determined according to the OARSI score

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) for functional evaluation of the articulation
Time Frame: At inclusion

The IKDC Questionnaire is a subjective scale that provides patients with an overall function score. The questionnaire looks at 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function. The symptoms subscale helps to evaluate things such as pain, stiffness, swelling and giving-way of the knee. Meanwhile, the sports activity subscale focuses on functions like going up and down the stairs, rising from a chair, squatting and jumping. The knee function subscale asks patients one simple question: how is their knee at present versus how was their knee prior to injury?

Scores are obtained by summing the individual items, then transforming the crude total to a scaled number that ranges from 0 to 100. This final number is interpreted as a measure of function with higher scores representing higher levels of function.

At inclusion
Score WOMAC (Western Ontario McMaster University ) for functional evaluation of the articulation
Time Frame: At inclusion
An arthritic pain scoring system ranging from 0-no pain/disability to 100-most severe pain/disability
At inclusion
Radiographic assesment of osteoarthritis according to absence/presence of pathology
Time Frame: At inclusion
At inclusion
Assesment of subchondral bone marrow vascularization by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) according to the % Area Under the Curve (AUC) of perfusion value
Time Frame: At inclusion
At inclusion
The magnetic resonance imaging -based Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WORMS) Score to assess the full spectrum of knee structures and the severity of knee pathologies
Time Frame: At inclusion
WORMS scoring for cartilage. Cartilage lesions are scored with the WORMS system on an eight-point scale, as follows: 0 indicates normal cartilage; 1, increased signal with fluid-sensitive intermediate-weighted sequences; 2, partial-thickness defect less than 1 cm in greatest width; 2.5, full-thickness defect less than 1 cm in greatest width; 3, multiple areas of partial-thickness (grade 2) defects intermixed with areas of normal thickness or a partial-thickness defect wider than 1 cm but less than 75% of the region; 4, diffuse (≥75% of the region) partial-thickness loss; 5, multiple areas of full-thickness loss (grade 2.5) or a full-thickness defect wider than 1 cm but less than 75% of the region; and 6, diffuse (≥75% of the region) full-thickness loss.
At inclusion
Analysis of the surgical section by the OARSI score (Osteoarthritis research society international) for evaluation of histologic status
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 3 years
The OARSI system is based on histologic features of osteoarthritis progression. The system employs analysis of a standard block/section assessment by grade, stage of arthritis with subsequent calculation of an arthritis score. With normal cartilage as grade 0, osteoarthritis severity is divided into six grades. Grades 1-4 involve articular cartilage changes only, whereas grades 5 and 6 involve subchondral bone as well.
through study completion, an average of 3 years
Osteoarthritis pathology assessment according to the number of vessels in the subchondral bone
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 3 years
Analysis of the surgical section
through study completion, an average of 3 years
Osteoarthritis pathology assessment according to the thickness of the subchondral bone
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 3 years
Analysis of the surgical section
through study completion, an average of 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raphael Coursier, MD, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Clinical evaluation

3
Subscribe