Corifollitropin Alfa Versus Daily rFSH in the Controlled Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders (MANCOR)

January 15, 2016 updated by: IVI Sevilla

Comparative Study Between the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa and Daily Recombinant FSH in the Controlled Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders

A randomised, crossover, multicentre, national, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of corifollitropin alfa versus daily recombinant FSH and HMG in the controlled ovarian stimulation of women with a poor ovarian response undergoing IVF treatments. The main objective of this study is comparing the number of oocytes obtained after the follicle puncture when using each of these two stimulation protocols. Only poor responders according to the Bologna criteria will be recruited for this trial. All participants will undergo two stimulation cycles to obtain and accumulate oocytes by vitrification. One of the cycles will be done with the corifollitropin alfa protocol and the other with daily rFSH and HMG, the order of application of these protocols will be randomised (crossover clinical trial) in each patient.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08017
        • IVI Barcelona
      • Madrid, Spain, 28023
        • IVI Madrid
      • Seville, Spain, 41006
        • IVI Sevilla
      • Valencia, Spain, 46015
        • IVI Valencia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced maternal age (≥40 years)
  • A previous poor ovarian response (≤3 oocytes with a conventional stimulation protocol)
  • An abnormal ovarian reserve test (i.e. antral follicle count <5-7 follicles or anti-mullerian hormone level <0.5-1.1 ng/ml)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group 1
First stimulation cycle with corifollitropin alfa (experimental) Second stimulation cycle with rFSH and HMG (active comparator)
One dose of 150 μg of corifollitropin alfa will be administered at day 1 of stimulation. Stimulation will be continued with 250-300 IU/day of rFSH from day 8 forward.
Other Names:
  • Elonva
Other: Group 2
First stimulation cycle with rFSH and HMG (active comparator) Second stimulation cycle with corifollitropin alfa (experimental)
One dose of 150 μg of corifollitropin alfa will be administered at day 1 of stimulation. Stimulation will be continued with 250-300 IU/day of rFSH from day 8 forward.
Other Names:
  • Elonva

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of mature oocytes (metaphase II)
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of mature oocytes (metaphase II) obtained after the follicle puncture
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of oocytes
Time Frame: 1 year
Total number of oocytes obtained after the follicle puncture
1 year
Symptoms associated with the ovarian stimulation protocol
Time Frame: 1 year
Patients will evaluate their symptoms using a questionnaire. They will score the intensity (from 1 to 10) of each of the following symptoms: pelvic pain, headache, mood swings, nausea, tiredness, breast pain.
1 year
Patient perception of the stimulation treatment
Time Frame: 1 year
Patients will evaluate how they have perceived the stimulation treatment using a questionnaire. They will score their comfort (from 1 to 10) with the following aspects of the treatment: treatment administration, number of injections and treatment length.
1 year
Length of the stimulation treatment
Time Frame: 1 year
Days of stimulation treatment
1 year
Number of subcutaneous injections
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of subcutaneous injections of gonadotropins (corifollitropin alfa, rFSH and HMG)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility

Clinical Trials on Corifollitropin alfa

Subscribe