- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02275273
Adnexal Masses : Correlation Between MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imagery) and Anatomopathology
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Several studies have identified the characteristics of adnexal masses obtained by different imaging techniques (echography, scanner and magnetic resonance) and corresponding to benign, borderline or malign masses (Kurtz et al 1999, Grabowska-Derlatka et al, 2013, Tanaka et al 2011, Asch et al 2008).
Recently, studies have even established ecographic and magnetic resonance imaging scores combining these characteristics (Thomassin-Naggara 2013, Timmerman 2005), some of these characteristics being considered as more suspect than others.
However, these studies have considered adnexal masses in their globality only and to our knowledge, none have correlated their imagery characteristics with their precise anatomopathology characteristics.
The goal of this study is thus to correlate the pelvic magnetic resonance imagery characteristics of the adnexal masses with their anatomopathology characteristics, in order to add complementary information for the future management of masses that are defined as borderline according to imagery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brussels, Belgium, 1020
- CHU Brugmann
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Every woman aged 18 years and more, with a planned pelvic magnetic resonance imagery and a planned adnexectomy within the institution.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Insufficient technical quality of the pelvic magnetic resonance imagery images or of the anatomopathological analysis.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Patients with adnexal masses
Every patient that are at least 18 years old with a planned pelvic magnetic resonance imagery and an adnexectomy within the institution.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
RECIST criteria
Time Frame: at MRI diagnosis
|
MRI imaging (standard protocol for ovarian pathology).
The MRI will be realised on a 3.0T instrument (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands).
The patient will be placed in dorsal decubitus with an antenna placed at the pelvic level.
Just before the examination, Buscopan IV will be injected.
The initial protocol will consist in a localisation examination followed by a standard protocol for ovarian pathologies, meaning a SE T2WI in the three plans, an axial diffusion sequence and a pondered T1 sequence (T1 dynamic contrast imaging).
The total examination time will be 20 minutes on average.
|
at MRI diagnosis
|
Percentage of epithelial and conjunctive zones in the adnexal mass obtained by surgery
Time Frame: 24h after MRI diagnosis
|
The anatomopathologist will contact the surgeons when an adnexectomy is programmed.
A detailed macroscopic description is realized (photographies of the external capsule) and the fragment is oriented according to 6 axes (superior, inferior, external, internal, anterior, posterior) with permanent tissues marking dyes.
The piece will be sectioned in 1cm slices, a picture of each one being taken.
The piece will be fixed in formol and embedded in paraffin.
Slices will be made using a RM 2235 Leica Microtome and colored with hematoxylin/eosin, for examination by the anatomopathologist.
The radiologist and the anatomopathologist will select, by consensus, interest zones that will be examined with an accredited microscope (ISO9001 accreditation).
Several parameters such as the percentage of epithelial and conjunctive zones will be observed, described and semi-quantified.
Immunomarkings will be realized if necessary, according to the criteria described in the ISO9001 accreditation files.
|
24h after MRI diagnosis
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Carine De Prez, Chef de service, CHU Brugmann
- Principal Investigator: Françoise HULET, MD, CHU Brugmann
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Thomassin-Naggara I, Aubert E, Rockall A, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Rouzier R, Darai E, Bazot M. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system. Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):432-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121161. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
- Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ferrazzi E, Ameye L, Konstantinovic ML, Van Calster B, Collins WP, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L; International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8794-801. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.7632.
- Kurtz AB, Tsimikas JV, Tempany CM, Hamper UM, Arger PH, Bree RL, Wechsler RJ, Francis IR, Kuhlman JE, Siegelman ES, Mitchell DG, Silverman SG, Brown DL, Sheth S, Coleman BG, Ellis JH, Kurman RJ, Caudry DJ, McNeil BJ. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology. 1999 Jul;212(1):19-27. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl3619.
- Grabowska-Derlatka L, Derlatka P, Palczewski P, Danska-Bidzinska A, Pacho R. Differentiation of ovarian cancers from borderline ovarian tumors on the basis of evaluation of tumor vascularity in multi-row detector computed tomography--comparison with histopathology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Nov;23(9):1597-602. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182a80a41.
- Tanaka YO, Okada S, Satoh T, Matsumoto K, Saida T, Oki A, Yoshikawa H, Minami M. Solid non-invasive ovarian masses on MR: histopathology and a diagnostic approach. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):e91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.032. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
- Asch E, Levine D, Kim Y, Hecht JL. Histologic, surgical, and imaging correlations of adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Mar;27(3):327-42. doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.3.327.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Adnexal masses
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Adnexal Masses
-
Shandong UniversityUnknownSolid Pancreatic MassesChina
-
American Society for Gastrointestinal EndoscopyMidwest Biomedical Research FoundationUnknownMediastinal or Intra-abdominal Lymphadenopathy, | Pancreatic Masses, | Left Adrenal Masses, | Gastrointestinal Submucosal Lesions, and | Liver MassesUnited States
-
University Health Network, TorontoWithdrawn
-
Asan Medical CenterCompletedPancreatic MassesKorea, Republic of
-
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityUnknownSolid Pancreatic MassesChina
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona; Catholic University of... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingSoft Tissue Masses
-
St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonUnknown