An Online Home-based Intervention for Anxiety Regulation

November 12, 2021 updated by: Lee Tih Shih, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
The aim of this project is to evaluate the safety and acceptability of our online, home-based, personalized, neuro-technological mindfulness-based intervention in entraining anxiety regulation and ameliorating anxiety in healthy adults. Our technology will deliver a mindfulness-based anxiety regulation intervention through a neuro-/ bio-feedback-based game interface that is driven by an electroencephalography (EEG) algorithm. We hypothesize that the intervention would be safe and acceptable. In exploratory analyses, we further hypothesize that the intervention would help entrain anxiety regulation and ameliorate anxiety in healthy adults. Data will be analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively to inform development of our intervention and future research studies.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Anxiety disorders, defined by excess worry, hyperarousal and fear, are amongst the most common class of psychiatric conditions in adults. Large population-based studies on anxiety disorders estimated a lifetime prevalence of 33.7% and a 12-month prevalence between 2.4% and 29.8%. In Singapore, however, studies have only established the prevalence of a limited range or anxiety disorders. In a nationwide, cross-sectional, epidemiological survey, the lifetime prevalence of anxiety disorders, specifically Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, rose from 0.9% and 3.0% respectively in 2010, to 1.6% and 3.6% in 2016. If untreated, anxiety disorders could result in a range of personal and societal costs, such as interpersonal dysfunctions, employment, physical health, social functioning, and frequent primary and acute care visits, resulting in a poor quality of life.

A large proportion of the population experiences subclinical symptoms of anxiety disorders which impede daily functioning and well-being, but most often do not seek professional help or fall below the radar of psychiatric services. Current treatment guidelines recommend pharmacotherapy (i.e. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] or venlafaxine) and psychotherapy (i.e. cognitive behavior therapy [CBT]) as first-line treatments for anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, SSRIs are associated with an increased risk of suicide in young adults. Thus, local practices often incorporate more psychological therapies in the treatment of anxiety disorders. However, CBT is labor-intensive and time-consuming - which is incompatible with the demanding lifestyle Singaporeans lead these days. Moreover, therapeutic outcomes are also very much therapist dependent. Due to the fear of stigma that is particularly salient in the local context, individuals with anxiety may be deterred from engaging with therapists. Even if these individuals do receive adequate treatment, existing literature shows that outcomes for recommended treatment modalities are sub-optimal at best, i.e. overall mean remission rate of CBT is 51% while pharmacotherapy is significantly lower. With the low rates of help-seeking behaviors and dismal success rates of existing therapies, novel interventions for anxiety are apposite and vital.

The benefits of mindfulness-based interventions have been extensively researched in anxiety disorders in recent years. Improvements reported across a range of outcomes include enhanced ability to cope with stress, reduced depressive and anxiety symptom severity, as well as improved sleep quality, all of which lead to increased life satisfaction and overall well-being. Not all anxiety regulation strategies are helpful, and mindful emotion regulation presents one promising strategy by cultivating a changing of relationship with one's emotions. Specifically, this strategy facilitates reduced reactivity to emotional stimuli by encouraging one to meet, accept, and detach from one's aversive feelings, thoughts, and ineffective habitual responses. Unfortunately, clinically anxious individuals with no experience in such practices could find it challenging to engage in them as they often require a high degree of individual discipline. Coupled with the fact that sustained practice is crucial to yield the benefits of mindfulness practice, an appealing mode of treatment delivery is necessary. To this end, gamification strategies could be useful: gamification strategies have been shown useful in motivating health-related behaviors through interaction with the immersive interventional programs. Recent preliminary studies have also suggested that neuro-/ biofeedback-based relaxation and mindfulness training is useful for both healthy and anxious individuals.

Accordingly, we have developed an online, home-based, personalized, neuro-technological mindfulness-based intervention and seek to conduct a preliminary study with healthy young adults to evaluate its safety and acceptability. Our technology will deliver a mindfulness-based anxiety regulation intervention through a neuro-/ bio-feedback-based game interface that is driven by an electroencephalography (EEG) algorithm. We hypothesize that the intervention would be safe and acceptable. We further hypothesize that the intervention would help entrain anxiety regulation and ameliorate anxiety in healthy adults.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169857
        • Duke-NUS Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 21 and 35 years old (inclusive).
  • Literate in English.
  • Computer literate and has access to a Windows 10 desktop or laptop
  • Beck Anxiety Inventory II total score ≥ 16

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis (as defined by DSM-5) of: any anxiety disorder induced by medication, substance, or another medical condition; obsessive compulsive disorder; bipolar disorder; any psychotic disorder (lifetime); intellectual disability (i.e. IQ < 70); autism spectrum disorder; attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder
  • History of substance or drug use disorder (as per DSM-5 criteria) within the last 3 months
  • Neurological disorders or insults (e.g. epilepsy, cerebrovascular accidents)
  • Metal in the cranium, skull defects, or skin lesions on scalp (cuts, abrasions, rash) at proposed electrode sites
  • Gross visual and hearing impairments
  • Irregular heart rhythms or heart problems, severe visual or hearing impairment
  • Prior experience with mindfulness-based therapy (e.g. mindfulness-based stress reduction [MBSR], mindfulness-based cognitive therapy [MBCT])

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Participants will undergo a brief interactive psychoeducation session four times a week for two weeks. For each session, participants will wear a commercially available Electroencephalography (EEG) headset and play a downloaded online game for a total of 30 minutes. Participants can feel free to play the game for more than the instructed frequency during their 2-week intervention participation.
Brain-computer Interface (BCI) is a direct communication pathway between a human brain and an external device. Electroencephalography (EEG) is the best studied non-invasive interface facilitating such communication. Our technology will deliver a mindfulness-based anxiety regulation intervention through a neuro-/ bio-feedback-based game interface that is driven by an EEG algorithm.
No Intervention: Waitlist control
Participants in Waitlist Control will receive no intervention in the first four weeks of the study. After the Intervention group has completed treatment, participants in the Waitlist Control will then undergo the same intervention as the Intervention group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Anxiety Inventory II (BAI-II)
Time Frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
21-item questionnaire being scored on a scale value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely). Higher total scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Intervention group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
State-trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
4-point Likert scale and consisting of 40 questions measuring two types of anxiety - state and trait anxiety.
Intervention group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
Usability questionnaire (System usability questionnaire)
Time Frame: Intervention group: Week 4 (post-intervention).
Participants will rate their agreeableness on 10 statements regarding their satisfaction and ease of use of the training components on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants will also answer three qualitative questions regarding their satisfaction and ease of use.
Intervention group: Week 4 (post-intervention).
IT Anxiety Scale (ITAS)
Time Frame: Intervention group: Week 4 (post-intervention).
7-point Likert scale and consisting of 12 statements measuring participants' anxiety towards information and communication technologies.
Intervention group: Week 4 (post-intervention).
Usability questionnaire (System usability questionnaire)
Time Frame: Waitlist control group: Week 7 (post-intervention).
Participants will rate their agreeableness on 10 statements regarding their satisfaction and ease of use of the training components on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants will also answer three qualitative questions regarding their satisfaction and ease of use.
Waitlist control group: Week 7 (post-intervention).
IT Anxiety Scale (ITAS)
Time Frame: Waitlist control group: Week 7 (post-intervention).
7-point Likert scale and consisting of 12 statements measuring participants' anxiety towards information and communication technologies.
Waitlist control group: Week 7 (post-intervention).
Number of Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events Reported
Time Frame: Throughout the intervention period (2 weeks), which are weeks 2 and 3 for the intervention group.
The total number and severity rating of all adverse events reported will be collated at the end of the study.
Throughout the intervention period (2 weeks), which are weeks 2 and 3 for the intervention group.
Number of Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events Reported
Time Frame: Throughout the intervention period (2 weeks), which are weeks 5 and 6 for the waitlist control group.
The total number and severity rating of all adverse events reported will be collated at the end of the study.
Throughout the intervention period (2 weeks), which are weeks 5 and 6 for the waitlist control group.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline sleep quality (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline sleep quality (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
19-item questionnaire assessing sleep quality over a 1-month time interval.
Intervention group: Changes from baseline sleep quality (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline sleep quality (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline insomnia symptoms (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
7-item instrument assessing the severity of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia.
Intervention group: Changes from baseline insomnia symptoms (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-SF)
Time Frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline emotional regulation (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
18-item measure used to identify emotional regulation issues in adults.
Intervention group: Changes from baseline emotional regulation (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
Mindfulness Awareness Attention Scale (MAAS)
Time Frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline mindfulness (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline mindfulness (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
15-item questionnaire assessing individual differences in the frequency of mindful states over time.
Intervention group: Changes from baseline mindfulness (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline mindfulness (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)
Time Frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline depression, anxiety and stress (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).
21-item questionnaire measures the severity of symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress.
Intervention group: Changes from baseline depression, anxiety and stress (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tih Shih Lee, MD PHD, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-220

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Brain-Computer Interface

3
Subscribe