Comparison of Bispectral Index Values in Patients With and Without Down's Syndrome

January 20, 2023 updated by: Priti G. Dalal, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
About 1 in every 700 babies born in the United States has Down's Syndrome (DS; Trisomy 21), 99% of whom have some degree of intellectual disability. Recent advances in medicine have resulted in a dramatically improved lifespan of about 25 to 60 years of age. Yet, there is limited data about anesthetic management in this increasing patient population. The bispectral index (BIS) monitor is a non-invasive monitoring device that reports a value between 0 and 100correlating to level of consciousness of an individual. A value of 0 indicates lack of brain activity while 100 indicates an awake/alert state. This monitor can be used to assess the depth of anesthesia. Patients with intellectual disability from congenital neurological diseases have lower BIS values compared to patients without any neurological impairment (Valkenburg 2009). The results may suggest that DS patients would require less anesthetic drugs compared to patients without any neurological impairment. To date, there are no studies in DS patients.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Based on the Valkenburg group's study (2009), one might hypothesize that if the BIS value is fixed for all patients, then a patient with an intellectual disability such as a patient with DS would require less anesthetic drugs compared to a control patient without any neurological disability. However, if one is only using a clinical sedation scale, the DS patient may receive more anesthetic drugs in order to achieve the same level of clinical unconsciousness as a patient without DS.

This project seeks to elucidate the effect of anesthetic techniques and agents on patients with DS compared to those without DS and any intellectual disability. The goal of this project is to compare BIS values in patients with DS to those without DS undergoing a standardized general anesthetic technique. The investigators hypothesize that patients with DS would have lower (>25%) BIS values compared to those without DS.

Known potential sources of artifact signals that could change BIS values include electromyographic activity, electric devices, hypothermia, hypoglycemia, and the timing and type of anesthetics used (Duarte 2009, Dahaba 2005). These potential sources will be identified and reported during the study, and those patients will be excluded from the study

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Hershey Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged 2-17 years (inclusive) scheduled for tympanostomy on the 24-hr and 48-hr operating room (OR) schedules

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients with DS and those without DS receiving BIS monitoring

    • Children between the ages of 2 and 17 years old (inclusive)
    • Patients scheduled for unilateral or bilateral tympanostomy (ear tube placement) at Penn State Hershey Medical Center
    • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II and III
    • Eligible for standard general anesthesia technique protocol as determined by anesthesia provider(s)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with congenital diseases/anomalies except Down's Syndrome
  • Patients with myotonic dystrophies or other neurodegenerative diseases
  • Patients with cerebrovascular accidents (strokes)
  • Patients not receiving BIS monitoring
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with allergic skin reactions to electrode patches
  • Patients 18 years of age and greater

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Normal
This is the group with no neurological problems or syndrome
We will be monitoring BIS in both groups. A BIS monitor may be placed prior to induction or immmeditaely afterwards for monitoring BIS. All patients will receive general anesthesia. A standard inhalation induction agent such as sevoflurane and oxygen will be administered via face mask with or without an oral airway. An inhalation agent will be administered for the duration of the procedure. The MAC goal for inhalation agents will be 1. If the patient moves, the MAC goal will be increased to 1.5 and this change will be recorded.
Other Names:
  • BIS
Down syndrome
This is the group with Down syndrome
We will be monitoring BIS in both groups. A BIS monitor may be placed prior to induction or immmeditaely afterwards for monitoring BIS. All patients will receive general anesthesia. A standard inhalation induction agent such as sevoflurane and oxygen will be administered via face mask with or without an oral airway. An inhalation agent will be administered for the duration of the procedure. The MAC goal for inhalation agents will be 1. If the patient moves, the MAC goal will be increased to 1.5 and this change will be recorded.
Other Names:
  • BIS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
measure BIS values in the normal patients and those with Down syndrome under anesthesia
Time Frame: 2 years
>25% lower BIS values in patients with DS compared to patients without DS
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Down Syndrome

Clinical Trials on monitoring BIS in both groups

3
Subscribe