TAP Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine in Robotic Hysterectomy

May 8, 2023 updated by: University of Minnesota

Ultrasound Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine in Robotic Hysterectomy Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.

The purpose of the study is to compare pain control after robotic hysterectomy surgery using either liposomal bupivacaine or Bupivacaine when injected during a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Robotic hysterectomy is when a patient is electively having robotic assisted removal of one's uterus. Both medications liposomal bupivacaine and Bupivacaine are standard of care in these types of surgeries.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Treatment technique:

The patient will be in the supine position. The transversus abdominis muscle layer will be identified with the ultrasound. Using sterile technique, skin infiltration with 2% lidocaine will occur, 2 cm medial to the ultrasound probe. An 22g Nerve block needle will then be inserted and advanced under ultrasound guidance until it is below the fascial covering of the transversus abdominis muscle layer. Gentle aspiration for air, or blood will be performed and either 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 parts epinephrine or 30 mL of liposomal bupivacaine mixed 1:1 with normal saline will be injected under ultrasound guidance. For each 5cc of local anesthetic injected, aspiration will be performed. Upon completion of the injection, the needle will then be removed. This will then be completed on the contralateral side. The patient will be monitored in the preoperative area until he/she is brought into the operating room for their procedure.

When the operation is complete the patient will either be discharged home or brought to the ward where each day a member of the research team will evaluate the patient for signs of complications and ask the patient their minimum and maximum pain score.

If patients have met criterion for discharge to home including pain <4/10, independence of intravenous analgesia, and are stable for discharge medically, but are awaiting placement, the time of discharge for the purposes of the study will be the day they have met such criterion as opposed to the day of actual discharge, as this can vary depending on patient placement.

If the patient is discharged prior to 72 hours post injection, then the patient will receive one phone call at 24 hours post injection, 48 hours post injection , and 72 hours post injection +/- 5 hours. During this phone call the patient will be asked about pain score, narcotic use, overall satisfaction via a recorded patient questionnaire, quality of recovery via a quality of recovery survey, and assessed if any adverse events have occurred.

Adequate analgesia will be defined as <3 VAS at rest, and if VAS is greater than 3 adjustments in oral or intravenous pain medications will be given as determined by the nurse.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • those who present for elective robotic assisted hysterectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non english speaking
  • chronic pain
  • on opioids greater than 1 weeks
  • chronic anticoagulation
  • allergy to local anesthetics
  • use of spinal or epidural for surgery
  • lack of patient cooperation
  • contraindication to regional anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: liposomal bupivacaine TAP
these patients receive a subcostal TAP with liposomal bupivacaine
Active Comparator: bupivacaine TAP
These patients receive a subcostal TAP with bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post Operative Opioid Use
Time Frame: 0-72 hours after injection
To determine if liposomal bupivacaine provides decreased narcotic use when compared to bupivacaine when injected in a TAP block
0-72 hours after injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: 48-72 hours
This was a measure of patient's reported pain on a 0-10 verbal numerical rating scale. 10 being worst pain. The maximal value for the time period 48-72 hours was chosen as the maximal pain during that time period.
48-72 hours
Post Operative Length of Stay
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
To determine if liposomal bupivacaine provides decreased length of stay when compared to bupivacaine when injected in a TAP block
up to 30 days after surgery
Patient Satisfaction as Assessed Via Patient Survey
Time Frame: assessed at 72 hours after injection
To determine if liposomal bupivacaine improves quality of recovery post-operatively when compared to bupivacaine when injected in a TAP block via a patient survey either in person or via telephone.
assessed at 72 hours after injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

Subscribe