Cognitive Training and Practice Effects in Mild Cognitive Impairment

May 28, 2020 updated by: Kevin Duff, University of Utah
The current study will test the effectiveness of a computerized cognitive training program on auditory memory and attention in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Practice effects will also be examined as a moderator of treatment response.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The current study will test the effectiveness of a computerized cognitive (thinking) training program on improving thinking and memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment. The investigators will also examine how short term changes in thinking abilities (i.e., practice effects) can be related to improvement in thinking abilities after the cognitive training program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

197

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University of Utah Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment, amnestic subtype

    • 65 years of age or older
    • Availability of a knowledgeable informant
  • Access to internet 3 hours per week
  • Adequate vision, hearing, and motor responding to participate in training

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of major stroke, head injury with loss of consciousness of >30 minutes, or other neurological disorder or systemic illness that are thought to be affecting cognition (e.g., seizure disorder, demyelinating disorder, etc.)
  • Current or past major psychiatric illness (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder)
  • History of substance abuse
  • Current use of antipsychotics or anticonvulsant medications
  • Currently residing in a nursing home or other skilled nursing facility

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: experimental cognitive training
Participants will use experimental computerized cognitive training exercises, 1 hour per day, 3 - 5 days per week, for 13 weeks.
Each group will perform computerized cognitive exercises, 1 hour per day, 3 - 5 days per week, for 13 weeks. The experimental group will use exercises shown to improve cognition, whereas the comparator group will use exercises without clear beneficial findings.
Active Comparator: control cognitive exercises
Participants will use control computerized cognitive activities, 1 hour per day, 3 - 5 days per week, for 13 weeks.
Each group will perform computerized cognitive exercises, 1 hour per day, 3 - 5 days per week, for 13 weeks. The experimental group will use exercises shown to improve cognition, whereas the comparator group will use exercises without clear beneficial findings.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Auditory Memory Attention Index
Time Frame: 13 weeks
This is a composite of six subtests of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. It is a standard score (mean=100, standard deviation=15), with a range of approximately 45 - 145, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
13 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kevin Duff, PhD, University of Utah

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 26, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R01AG045163 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Other researchers can contact the PI to request copies of the study data.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on computerized cognitive exercises

Subscribe