CHangeovers of Norepinephrine in Intensive Care (CHIC)

March 15, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Angers

Prospective, Randomized, Multi-center Trial Aiming to Determined the Impact of Changeovers of Norepinephrine on the Blood Pressure Stability With Patients in Shock in ICU.

CHIC study's purpose is to compare the efficiency, in terms of blood pressure stability, of three changeovers of norepinephrine used routinely in ICU. The three techniques are:

  • Quick change
  • Double pumping
  • Smart infusion pumps

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The drugs used in intensive care units are numerous and their administration is based on a strong expertise in this context of urgency and complexity. Nurses role is not only to carry out preparation of a treatment but to implement a complex treatment that requires a risk management approach surpassing the simple task to which the decree of professional acts refers to.

In this context, the administration of catecholamines, widely used in intensive care medicine in the treatment of shock, appears to be a sensitive issue to study. These vasoactive drugs have a short half-life and a narrow therapeutic index. Administration should be careful ensuring both efficiency and prevention of complications such as hemodynamic instability or arrhythmias.

Administration of these therapeutic must be strictly continuous, that is to say delivered using electric syringe pumps. Syringe replacements appear as critical moments because of the risk of flow change or brief interruption of the infusion.

There are three main types of syringes relay techniques, but to date, no study has compared these techniques with each other. There is thus no recommendation based on objective datas to guide clinical nursing practice.

This study aims to provide evidence in order to secure the administration of catecholamines. It may also use as a reference for evaluation of new features that allow automation relays with called "smart pumps" and for which no study has demonstrated the added value in terms of security. No progress will be possible in securing the administration of drugs with a short half-life, narrow therapeutic index and significant side effects without a deep reflection of the conditions of their infusion. The choice of materials used and the development of care procedures must be based on reliable and timely recommendations. Patients expect safer care. Nurses must be able to have references enabling them to guide their practice to the benefit of patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

285

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France
        • Le Roy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission in Intensive Care Unit
  • Norepinephrine perfusion started for less than three hours in ICU
  • Invasive monitoring of blood pressure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  • Previous participation in the trial
  • No registration in any health care system
  • Patient protected by law
  • Patient study refusal
  • Active therapeutic limitation decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Quick change

For this changeover : When the syringe of norepinephrine stops (pre alarm), start the second syringe pumps at the same speed of the first, wait for a first drop at the end of the tubing.

Close the first syringe, disconnect it and connect the second syringe, open the valve on and stop the first syringe.

Experimental: Double Pumping

For this changeover : When the syringe of norepinephrine stops (pre alarm), start the second syringe pumps, open the second syringe while leaving the first syringe open. Wait until the blood pressure rises 5 mmHg (SBP, DBP or MAP).

Once the blood pressure increased or 2 minutes from the start of the relay if no increase in blood pressure is observed, close the first syringe.

Experimental: Smart infusion pump
For this automatic changeover : When the syringe of norepinephrine stops (pre alarm), oversee the progress of the automatic relay.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
percentage of norepinephrine' syringes causing a change in the mean blood pressure over 15 mmHg
Time Frame: in the 15 minutes following the beginning of the relay
in the 15 minutes following the beginning of the relay

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of norepinephrine syringe's relays causing a hypotension defined by a 15 mmHg decrease of the mean blood pressure
Time Frame: in the 15 minutes following the beginning of the relay
in the 15 minutes following the beginning of the relay
Percentage of norepinephrine syringe's relays causing a hypertension defined by a 15 mmHg increase of the mean blood pressure
Time Frame: in the 15 minutes following the beginning of the relay
in the 15 minutes following the beginning of the relay
Average time in minute spend by a nurse to change the syringe
Time Frame: 15 minutes following the beginning of the relay
15 minutes following the beginning of the relay

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PHRIP-2013
  • 2014-A00591-46 (Other Identifier: ID RCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock

Subscribe