Efficacy of Microcurrent Therapy After Eccentric Exercise

June 8, 2015 updated by: Christophe Demoulin, University of Liege

15 participants will be included in the present study. They will attend two groups of three sessions (i.e. sessions 1-2-3 and sessions 4-5-6) spaced by 3 months:

  • session 1 and 4 (performed a few days before the experimental session): session for participants to get familiarized with the test battery.
  • session 2 and 5: experimental session (the test battery followed by the provocative task, the test battery, the one-hour "treatment" and the test battery again).
  • session 3 and 6 (performed 2 days later): the test battery.

The test battery included flexibility, functional, pressure pain threshold tests.

The provocative task was an isokinetic eccentric task for knee flexors and extensors.

The treatment was either a microcurrent therapy or a placebo microcurrent therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective:

To study the efficacy of microcurrent to reduce DOMS (Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness) occuring after an eccentric exercise

Methods:

Experimental protocol

Participants will attend two groups of three sessions (i.e. sessions 1-2-3 and sessions 4-5-6) spaced by 3 months:

  • session 1 and 4 (performed a few days before the experimental session): session for participants to get familiarized with the test battery.
  • session 2 and 5: experimental session: the test battery followed by the provocative task, the test battery, the one-hour "treatment" (real microcurrents at one of the session and placebo microcurrents at the other one) and the test battery again.
  • session 3 and 6 (performed 2 days later): the test battery.

Before starting session 2, patients will be randomized into the microcurrent group or the placebo microcurrent group. Three months later, participants will change of group.

The Test Battery: it will be conducted by a blind (to the treatment) investigator. It will include knee flexor and extensor flexibility tests, a functional test (unilateral " counter-movement jump "), a pain to measure pain threshold of thigh muscles and an isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) test of knee flexors and extensors.

The Provocative task: 40 isokinetic eccentric contractions of knee flexors and extensors.

The one-hour Treatment: with the participant lying on an examination table, several electrodes were located over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy was then started. It was stopped after 5 seconds in the "Placebo group" and after one hour in the real "Microcurrent group". The microcurrents were delivered by the machine B-E-St®.

Follow-up: in addition to the 48hours follow-up (session 3/6), participants will fill in a pain visual analogue scale each day after the session 2/5.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Liege, Belgium, 4000
        • Liege University Hospital Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Asymptomatic subjects

Exclusion Criteria:

  • practice of sports >3h per week
  • present pain in the lower limbs
  • history of thigh muscle injuries
  • recent injury (last 3 months) of the lower limbs
  • recent (last 3 months) plyometric exercises or lower limbs strengthening program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham microcurrent therapy
The participant is lying on an examination table for one hour; several electrodes are placed over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy is then started but it lasts only for 5 seconds.
Several electrodes are placed over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy is then started but lasts only for five seconds.
Experimental: Microcurrent Group
The participant is lying on an examination table for one hour; several electrodes are placed over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy is then started.
Several electrodes are placed over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy is then started and lasts for one hour.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intensity of pain (Visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up, following days until pain disappears
baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up, following days until pain disappears

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Flexibility of quadriceps and hamstrings muscles
Time Frame: baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up

Flexibility of quadriceps muscle was assessed by means of the Prone Quadriceps Flexibility test.

Flexibility of hamstrings was assessed by means of the Straight Leg Raising (SLR) test

baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up
Functional test (Unilateral counter-movement jump)
Time Frame: baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up
Unilateral counter-movement jump
baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up
Pain sensibility threshold (Determined by using a dolorimeter)
Time Frame: baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up
Determined by using a dolorimeter
baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up
Isometric strength (Maximal voluntary contraction of knee flexor and extensor muscles)
Time Frame: baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up
Maximal voluntary contraction of knee flexor and extensor muscles
baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christophe Demoulin, PhD, University of Liège

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness

Clinical Trials on Sham microcurrent therapy

3
Subscribe