Sirolimus Versus Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (antiVEGF) for Wet AMD

June 20, 2017 updated by: Maturi, Raj K., M.D., P.C.

Sirolimus Versus AntiVEGF for Wet AMD

Phase 2 clinical trial, single site, randomized, subject-masked study to determine safety and efficacy of intravitreal injections of Sirolimus in subjects with wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (wet AMD) with persistent intraretinal or subretinal edema due to neovascular AMD despite previous AntiVEGF treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Forty subjects will be randomized to receive intravitreal Sirolimus or standard of care treatment in a 1:1 ratio. Over the course of the six month trial plus a 6 month optional extension, subjects will be evaluated monthly. Treatment with Sirolimus will be given at baseline, month 2 and month 4 with sham injections given at months 1, 3 and 5. For subjects in the extension Sirolimus will also be given at months 6, 8 and 10 with sham at month 7, 9, and 11. Subjects in the standard of care group will receive anti-VEGF injections or sham monthly. Retreatment criteria will be based upon continued subretinal edema, intraretinal edema or active chorioretinal neovascularization (CNV)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
        • Raj K Maturi MD PC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • best corrected visual acuity of 5-65, inclusive, in study eye
  • presence of choroid neovascularization secondary to AMD
  • persistent edema despite at least 3 previous intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in the past 5 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • greater than 100 micron decrease in central subfield thickness on Optical Coherence Topography (OCT) since last standard of care visit
  • history of major ophthalmic surgery in the study eye in the past 3 months
  • history of significant ocular disease or condition other than exudative AMD that may confound results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sirolimus
Intravitreal Sirolimus
intravitreal injection
Other Names:
  • DE-109
Active Comparator: Standard of Care intravitreal anti-VEGF
anti-VEGF intravitreal injections
intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF
Other Names:
  • avastin,bevacizumab, eylea, aflibercept,

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Edema From Baseline to Month 6 Central Subfield Thickness ) on Heidelberg Optical Coherence Topography
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in edema from baseline to month 6 as measured by mean difference in microns of central subfield thickness on Heidelberg optical coherence topography in each treatment group
Baseline to 6 months
Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
number of subjects with gain of 0-4 letters of visual acuity
Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Acuity (Best Corrected Visual Acuity)
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months
number of subjects with gain of 5 or more letters of visual acuity
baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Sirolimus

3
Subscribe