- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02384434
Low Level Laser Therapy for Radiation Induced Dermatitis in H & N Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Utilization of Low Level Laser Therapy for Radiation Induced Dermatitis in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This single-arm phase I/II study establishes the safety and efficacy of low level laser therapy (LLLT) in order to mitigate radiation-induced dermatitis in patients underoing radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Additional objectives include assessment of patient-reported quality of life data, pain parameters and dermatologic quality of life responses. The target population is patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx who are candidates for either definitive or adjuvant therapy consisting of a chemotherapy regimen and concurrent radiation therapy.
Patients are required to have a favorable performance status (KPS greater than or equal to 70), have had no prior head and neck radiotherapy and be at least 18 years of age and able to provide consent. While receiving radiotherapy and a concurrent systemic regimen, patients will receive LLLT using a 69 diode probe with dual 660 nm and 850 nm wavelengths to at least nine treatment sites in the head and neck region for a duration of 60 seconds to each site. LLLT will be given three times in a week prior to, daily during the first week of, and at least twice weekly thereafter during radiotherapy.
Information collected includes toxicity scoring and quality of life surveys. A retrospective matched-pair design will be used to assess the rate of grade III complications compared to patients treated previously without LLLT support, with an anticipated 20% reduction in the risk of grade III dermatitis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center - Shadyside Radiation Oncology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
- Karnofsky performance status > 70
- Histologic proof of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx
- No prior radiotherapy to the head and neck region.
- No previous systemic chemotherapy or targeted therapy
- Must be aware of the neoplastic nature of his/her disease and willingly provide written, informed consent after being informed of the procedure to be followed, the nature of the therapy, alternatives, potential benefits, side-effects, risks and discomforts.
- Patients using standard therapies for cetuximab-induced acne-form rash will be included.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of distant metastasis on upright chest x-ray (CXR), computed tomography (CT) or other staging studies
- Any co-morbidity or condition of sufficient severity to limit full compliance with the protocol per assessment by the investigator
- Concurrent serious infection
- Continued use of Niacin
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Low Level Laser Therapy
Non-invasive, cold laser output treatment.
|
Non-invasive, a cold laser output treatment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
Number of patients with documented Grade 3 or higher Adverse Events as per CTCAE v4.0.
|
Up to 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL)
Time Frame: At Baseline
|
The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) consists of 12 single question domains focusing on patient health/quality of life within the past 7 days.
Domains are scaled evenly from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) per the hierarchy of response.
The domains are pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood and anxiety; patient choice of up to three of these domains that have been the most important to them.
There are also three global questions, one about how the patient feel relative to before they developed their cancer, one about their health-related QOL and one about overall QOL.
Patients are asked to consider not only physical & mental health, but also many other factors, such as family, friends, spirituality or personal leisure activities that were important to their enjoyment of life in overall quality of life.
Scores for each of the individual response options are summed to determine the domain score.
|
At Baseline
|
|
University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL)
Time Frame: Up to 4.5 months
|
The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) consists of 12 single question domains focusing on patient health/quality of life within the past 7 days.
Domains are scaled evenly from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) per the hierarchy of response.
The domains are pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood and anxiety; patient choice of up to three of these domains that have been the most important to them.
There are also three global questions, one about how the patient feel relative to before they developed their cancer, one about their health-related QOL and one about overall QOL.
Patients are asked to consider not only physical & mental health, but also many other factors, such as family, friends, spirituality or personal leisure activities that were important to their enjoyment of life in overall quality of life.
Scores for each of the individual response options are summed to determine the domain score.
|
Up to 4.5 months
|
|
University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL)
Time Frame: 4.5-7.5 months
|
The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) consists of 12 single question domains focusing on patient health/quality of life within the past 7 days.
Domains are scaled evenly from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) per the hierarchy of response.
The domains are pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood and anxiety; patient choice of up to three of these domains that have been the most important to them.
There are also three global questions, one about how the patient feel relative to before they developed their cancer, one about their health-related QOL and one about overall QOL.
Patients are asked to consider not only physical & mental health, but also many other factors, such as family, friends, spirituality or personal leisure activities that were important to their enjoyment of life in overall quality of life.
Scores for each of the individual response options are summed to determine the domain score.
|
4.5-7.5 months
|
|
University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL)
Time Frame: 7.5-10.5 months
|
The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) consists of 12 single question domains focusing on patient health/quality of life within the past 7 days.
Domains are scaled evenly from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) per the hierarchy of response.
The domains are pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood and anxiety; patient choice of up to three of these domains that have been the most important to them.
There are also three global questions, one about how the patient feel relative to before they developed their cancer, one about their health-related QOL and one about overall QOL.
Patients are asked to consider not only physical & mental health, but also many other factors, such as family, friends, spirituality or personal leisure activities that were important to their enjoyment of life in overall quality of life.
Scores for each of the individual response options are summed to determine the domain score.
|
7.5-10.5 months
|
|
University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL)
Time Frame: 10.5-13.5 months
|
The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) consists of 12 single question domains focusing on patient health/quality of life within the past 7 days.
Domains are scaled evenly from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) per the hierarchy of response.
The domains are pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood and anxiety; patient choice of up to three of these domains that have been the most important to them.
There are also three global questions, one about how the patient feel relative to before they developed their cancer, one about their health-related QOL and one about overall QOL.
Patients are asked to consider not only physical & mental health, but also many other factors, such as family, friends, spirituality or personal leisure activities that were important to their enjoyment of life in overall quality of life.
Scores for each of the individual response options are summed to determine the domain score.
|
10.5-13.5 months
|
|
University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL)
Time Frame: 13.5-16.5 months
|
The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) consists of 12 single question domains focusing on patient health/quality of life within the past 7 days.
Domains are scaled evenly from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) per the hierarchy of response.
The domains are pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood and anxiety; patient choice of up to three of these domains that have been the most important to them.
There are also three global questions, one about how the patient feel relative to before they developed their cancer, one about their health-related QOL and one about overall QOL.
Patients are asked to consider not only physical & mental health, but also many other factors, such as family, friends, spirituality or personal leisure activities that were important to their enjoyment of life in overall quality of life.
Scores for each of the individual response options are summed to determine the domain score.
|
13.5-16.5 months
|
|
University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL)
Time Frame: after 16.5 months, up to 48.9 months
|
The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) consists of 12 single question domains focusing on patient health/quality of life within the past 7 days.
Domains are scaled evenly from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) per the hierarchy of response.
The domains are pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood and anxiety; patient choice of up to three of these domains that have been the most important to them.
There are also three global questions, one about how the patient feel relative to before they developed their cancer, one about their health-related QOL and one about overall QOL.
Patients are asked to consider not only physical & mental health, but also many other factors, such as family, friends, spirituality or personal leisure activities that were important to their enjoyment of life in overall quality of life.
Scores for each of the individual response options are summed to determine the domain score.
|
after 16.5 months, up to 48.9 months
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Pain parameters assessed using Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes (impact on) with common dimensions of feeling and function. No scoring algorithm, but "worst pain" or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (Pain Worst in last week, Pain least in last week, Average Pain, Pain right now) indicates pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items (General Activity, Mood, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Relationships, Sleep, Enjoyment of Life) measures how much pain impacted/interfered with a patient's various daily activities. Total scores range = 0 -10 for each item (mean of patient scores for each item). Pain and interference of pain in daily activities is scored as follows: 1 - 4 = Mild, 5 - 6 = Moderate, 7 - 10 = Severe Higher scores indicate greater pain and/or greater impact of pain and interference in activity, per item. |
Baseline
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: Up to 4.5 months
|
Pain parameters assessed using Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes (impact on) with common dimensions of feeling and function. No scoring algorithm, but "worst pain" or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (Pain Worst in last week, Pain least in last week, Average Pain, Pain right now) indicates pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items (General Activity, Mood, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Relationships, Sleep, Enjoyment of Life) measures how much pain impacted/interfered with a patient's various daily activities. Total scores range = 0 -10 for each item (mean of patient scores for each item). Pain and interference of pain in daily activities is scored as follows: 1 - 4 = Mild, 5 - 6 = Moderate, 7 - 10 = Severe Higher scores indicate greater pain and/or greater impact of pain and interference in activity, per item. |
Up to 4.5 months
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: 4.5-7.5 months
|
Pain parameters assessed using Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes (impact on) with common dimensions of feeling and function. No scoring algorithm, but "worst pain" or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (Pain Worst in last week, Pain least in last week, Average Pain, Pain right now) indicates pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items (General Activity, Mood, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Relationships, Sleep, Enjoyment of Life) measures how much pain impacted/interfered with a patient's various daily activities. Total scores range = 0 -10 for each item (mean of patient scores for each item). Pain and interference of pain in daily activities is scored as follows: 1 - 4 = Mild, 5 - 6 = Moderate, 7 - 10 = Severe Higher scores indicate greater pain and/or greater impact of pain and interference in activity, per item. |
4.5-7.5 months
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: 7.5-10.5 months
|
Pain parameters assessed using Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes (impact on) with common dimensions of feeling and function. No scoring algorithm, but "worst pain" or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (Pain Worst in last week, Pain least in last week, Average Pain, Pain right now) indicates pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items (General Activity, Mood, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Relationships, Sleep, Enjoyment of Life) measures how much pain impacted/interfered with a patient's various daily activities. Total scores range = 0 -10 for each item (mean of patient scores for each item). Pain and interference of pain in daily activities is scored as follows: 1 - 4 = Mild, 5 - 6 = Moderate, 7 - 10 = Severe Higher scores indicate greater pain and/or greater impact of pain and interference in activity, per item. |
7.5-10.5 months
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: 10.5-13.5 months
|
Pain parameters assessed using Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes (impact on) with common dimensions of feeling and function. No scoring algorithm, but "worst pain" or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (Pain Worst in last week, Pain least in last week, Average Pain, Pain right now) indicates pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items (General Activity, Mood, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Relationships, Sleep, Enjoyment of Life) measures how much pain impacted/interfered with a patient's various daily activities. Total scores range = 0 -10 for each item (mean of patient scores for each item). Pain and interference of pain in daily activities is scored as follows: 1 - 4 = Mild, 5 - 6 = Moderate, 7 - 10 = Severe Higher scores indicate greater pain and/or greater impact of pain and interference in activity, per item. |
10.5-13.5 months
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: 13.5-16.5 months
|
Pain parameters assessed using Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes (impact on) with common dimensions of feeling and function. No scoring algorithm, but "worst pain" or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (Pain Worst in last week, Pain least in last week, Average Pain, Pain right now) indicates pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items (General Activity, Mood, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Relationships, Sleep, Enjoyment of Life) measures how much pain impacted/interfered with a patient's various daily activities. Total scores range = 0 -10 for each item (mean of patient scores for each item). Pain and interference of pain in daily activities is scored as follows: 1 - 4 = Mild, 5 - 6 = Moderate, 7 - 10 = Severe Higher scores indicate greater pain and/or greater impact of pain and interference in activity, per item. |
13.5-16.5 months
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: after 16.5 months, up to 48.9 months
|
Pain parameters assessed using Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes (impact on) with common dimensions of feeling and function. No scoring algorithm, but "worst pain" or the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (Pain Worst in last week, Pain least in last week, Average Pain, Pain right now) indicates pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items (General Activity, Mood, Walking Ability, Normal Work, Relationships, Sleep, Enjoyment of Life) measures how much pain impacted/interfered with a patient's various daily activities. Total scores range = 0 -10 for each item (mean of patient scores for each item). Pain and interference of pain in daily activities is scored as follows: 1 - 4 = Mild, 5 - 6 = Moderate, 7 - 10 = Severe Higher scores indicate greater pain and/or greater impact of pain and interference in activity, per item. |
after 16.5 months, up to 48.9 months
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Dermatologic quality of life responses measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
The DLQI is a ten-question questionnaire designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from a skin disease, the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week.
Each question is scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life).
Scoring bands: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life, 2-5 = Small effect, 6-10 = Moderate effect, 11-20 = Very large effect, 21-30 = Extremely large effect.
Higher scores indicate greater impact of skin disease on patient's life.
|
Baseline
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: Up to 4.5 months
|
Dermatologic quality of life responses measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
The DLQI is a ten-question questionnaire designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from a skin disease, the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week.
Each question is scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life).
Scoring bands: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life, 2-5 = Small effect, 6-10 = Moderate effect, 11-20 = Very large effect, 21-30 = Extremely large effect.
Higher scores indicate greater impact of skin disease on patient's life.
|
Up to 4.5 months
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: 4.5 - 7.5 months
|
Dermatologic quality of life responses measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
The DLQI is a ten-question questionnaire designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from a skin disease, the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week.
Each question is scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life).
Scoring bands: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life, 2-5 = Small effect, 6-10 = Moderate effect, 11-20 = Very large effect, 21-30 = Extremely large effect.
Higher scores indicate greater impact of skin disease on patient's life.
|
4.5 - 7.5 months
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: 7.5-10.5 months
|
Dermatologic quality of life responses measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
The DLQI is a ten-question questionnaire designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from a skin disease, the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week.
Each question is scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life).
Scoring bands: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life, 2-5 = Small effect, 6-10 = Moderate effect, 11-20 = Very large effect, 21-30 = Extremely large effect.
Higher scores indicate greater impact of skin disease on patient's life.
|
7.5-10.5 months
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: 10.5-13.5 months
|
Dermatologic quality of life responses measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
The DLQI is a ten-question questionnaire designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from a skin disease, the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week.
Each question is scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life).
Scoring bands: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life, 2-5 = Small effect, 6-10 = Moderate effect, 11-20 = Very large effect, 21-30 = Extremely large effect.
Higher scores indicate greater impact of skin disease on patient's life.
|
10.5-13.5 months
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: 13.5-16.5 months
|
Dermatologic quality of life responses measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
The DLQI is a ten-question questionnaire designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from a skin disease, the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week.
Each question is scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life).
Scoring bands: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life, 2-5 = Small effect, 6-10 = Moderate effect, 11-20 = Very large effect, 21-30 = Extremely large effect.
Higher scores indicate greater impact of skin disease on patient's life.
|
13.5-16.5 months
|
|
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: after 16.5 months, up to 48.9 months
|
Dermatologic quality of life responses measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
The DLQI is a ten-question questionnaire designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from a skin disease, the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week.
Each question is scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life).
Scoring bands: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life, 2-5 = Small effect, 6-10 = Moderate effect, 11-20 = Very large effect, 21-30 = Extremely large effect.
Higher scores indicate greater impact of skin disease on patient's life.
|
after 16.5 months, up to 48.9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Heath Skinner, MD, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HCC 18-128
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Radiation Dermatitis
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
German University in CairoAin Shams UniversityCompleted
-
China Medical University HospitalCompletedRadiation DermatitisTaiwan
-
Sheba Medical CenterFerring PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
Apeiron BiologicsCompleted
-
Lutris Pharma Ltd.CompletedRadiation DermatitisUnited States
-
University of RochesterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRadiation-induced Dermatitis
-
China Medical University HospitalNot yet recruitingBreast Cancer | Radiation Dermatitis
-
Pharm Olam Pharmaceuticals Ltd.UnknownPrevention of Radiation Induced Dermatitis.
-
Parul BarryBravida MedicalCompletedRadiation Dermatitis AcuteUnited States
Clinical Trials on THOR Laser System for Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreUnknown
-
Universidade do Vale do SapucaiCompletedBreast Neoplasms | Radiotherapy; Adverse Effect, Dermatitis or EczemaBrazil
-
European University of LefkeRecruitingAcute Pain | Pain Threshold | Low-level Laser Therapy | Pain Tolerance | LLLT vs ShamCyprus
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreUnknownCardiovascular DiseasesBrazil
-
Hasselt UniversityJessa HospitalCompletedHead Cancer | Neck CancerBelgium
-
Mashhad University of Medical SciencesUnknownMyofacial Pain SyndromeIran, Islamic Republic of
-
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh...RecruitingLow Level Laser Therapy | Third Molars Extraction | Bone HealingVietnam
-
Aga Khan UniversityCompletedPain | Periodontitis | Gingivitis | Tooth MigrationPakistan
-
University Hospital RijekaUniversity of ZagrebCompletedPain Relief Caused by Placing Orthodontic SeparatorsCroatia
-
Baylor UniversityRecruiting