Feasability of Collaborative Care in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease

October 9, 2018 updated by: Christoph Herrmann-Lingen, University of Göttingen

Feasability and Effectiveness of a Collaborative Care Intervention in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease - A Pilot Study

The main focus of the pilot study is to evaluate the feasability and effectiveness of a collaborative care intervention for patients suffering from a coronary heart disease (CHD) with insufficient controlled health related risk factors in their lifestyle. The design of the study is a wait list control design. 30 patients will receive treatment immediately after submission, the other 30 after 6 months. An interdisciplinary team, including a care manager for each patient, will offer an individualized treatment plan, based on shared decision making for each patient to reduce risk factors and improve quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The following assumptions will be evaluated:

  1. The collaborative care concept is feasable in the context of the german health care system and leads to greater patient satisfaction
  2. The team-based intervention leads to a decrease of cardiovascular risk factors of patients in the intervention group compared to participants in the waitlist condition
  3. The collaborative care intervention leads to an improvement of quality of life as well as mental well being of participants in the intervention group compared to participants of the waitlist condition

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Göttingen, Germany, 37075
        • Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Univ. of Goettingen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • both sexes
  • coronary heart disease (angiographically oder clinically approved)
  • sufficient knowledge of the german language
  • at least one not sufficient controlled risk factor : Diabetes mellitus (HbA1c>7,5%), smoking, lack of physical activity (less than 60 minutes of light physical exercise per week), heightened stress level (PSS-4 >5), arterial hypertension (blood pressure despite medication repeatedly heightened >140/90 or in a 24-hour measurement >135/85 mmHg), hypercholesteremia (LDL >130 mg/dl)
  • written informed consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no existence of an medically approved coronary heart disease
  • insufficient knowledge of the german language and ulterior disabilities to complete the questionnaires or to understand the education about the Intervention
  • existence of a psychosis
  • drug dependency (except tobacco)
  • dementia
  • severe episode of Depression
  • current suicidal tendency
  • cardiac insufficiency NYHA 4
  • missing informed consent
  • malign tumor (unless curative treated and without relapse)
  • acute coronary syndrome or cardiosurgery within the last 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: collaborative care, CHD
Participants start with the collaborative care intervention at baseline directly after inclusion.
Over a time span of 6 months participants receive individualized treatment to reduce risk factors and improve quality of life, based on their preferences following a health plan, which they developed with their health coach.
Active Comparator: collaborative care CHD - waitlist
Participants start with the intervention 6 months after baseline, in the meantime they receive tau.
Over a time span of 6 months participants receive individualized treatment to reduce risk factors and improve quality of life, based on their preferences following a health plan, which they developed with their health coach.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients´ satisfaction with treatment between baseline and the up to 12 months follow-up
Time Frame: up to 12 months follow-up
September 2014: baseline for both groups; first 30 participants start with the Intervention, march 2015: 6-months follow-up for intervention group, participants from the wait list group start with active intervention phase, September 2015: 12-months follow-up intervention group; 6-months follow-up participants wait list group, march 2016: 12-months follow-up participants wait list group
up to 12 months follow-up
Change in composite cardiovascular risk score
Time Frame: Baseline to six months
Change in cardiovascular risk factor score comprised of secondary outcomes mentioned below
Baseline to six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Smoking
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Actual smoking behavior:yes
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Lack of physical exercise
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Less than 60 minutes of light physical exercise per week
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
LDL cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
A LDL value of >130mg/dl or higher
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Hypertension
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
A blood pressure value of >140/90 mmHg or in a 24 hour measurement >135/85 mmHg
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Increased HbA1c
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
A HbA1c value of >7,5% or higher
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Heightened level of stress
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
A value in the PSS-4 >5 is an indicator for an heigtened stress level
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical strain
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Physical strain is measured with the 6-minutes walking test
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Fear and depression
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Fear and Depression is measured with the HADS-D; Herrmann-Lingen, Buss & Snaith, 1995
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Self-efficacy is measured with the GSW-6; Romppel et al., 2006
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Social support
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Social Support is measured with the ESSI-D, Cordes et al., 2009
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up
Quality of life is measured with the SF-12, Radoschewski & Bellach,1999
Baseline and up to 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Christoph Herrmann-Lingen, Prof. Dr., University of Goettingen, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on collaborative care CHD

Subscribe