Collaborative Care for Infants at Risk (CCIR)

November 8, 2020 updated by: Kristine Campbell, University of Utah
This study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a collaborative care practice for infants investigated by state Child Protective Services (CPS) for suspected maltreatment. Recognizing the vulnerability of infants referred into CPS in the first year of life, as well as the frequent contact of infants with health care providers in the first year of life, the investigators will conduct a RCT to measure the impact of a collaborative practice model linking CPS caseworkers with primary health care providers during an investigation for suspected infant maltreatment. With this trial, the investigators will ask (3a) Can a collaborative practice model improve parent-reported infant health-related quality of life 6 months following child welfare involvement for suspected infant maltreatment? and (3b) Does a collaborative practice model impact repeat child welfare involvement for suspected child maltreatment over 6 months?

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

468

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84113
        • The Center for Safe and Healthy Families, Primary Children's Hospital Eccles Outpatient Building, 81 North Mario Capecchi Dr 4E-200

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 11 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 12 months of age at referral
  • Involved in a child welfare investigation for suspected maltreatment
  • Investigation occurring in Utah DCFS Salt Lake Valley or Western regions

Exclusion Criteria:

For the primary and selected secondary outcomes,

  • Caregiver with primary spoken language other than English or Spanish,
  • CPS caseworkers not yet randomized to a practice arm
  • Infants in out-of-home placement at the time of referral or case closure,
  • Infants suffering fatal maltreatment
  • Prior investigation of an infant in a household during study timeframe (e.g., twins, infant siblings, and repeat referrals will be excluded).

For other secondary outcomes related to CPS outcomes, language exclusion will not be considered.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Collaborative Care
CPS caseworkers will be randomized to collaborative or comparison practice. For any infant investigated by a caseworker in the collaborative practice, the caseworkers will conduct a standard CPS investigation. Additionally, caseworkers will seek parental permission to contact an identified primary health care provider at two points in the CPS investigation for information sharing related to health needs, social risks, and recommended interventions.
CPS caseworkers will explain collaborative care to parents, ask parents to allow communication with an infant's primary care provider, and have willing parents sign a release allowing communication with the infant's provider during the investigation. Caseworkers will make at least two attempts to contact identified providers with parental consent. In the first week, caseworkers will contact the provider, identify the infant, and summarize the child maltreatment concerns. The caseworker will ask whether the provider recognizes any additional strengths or vulnerabilities for the infant. Prior to case closure, caseworkers will provide a summary of investigation findings, disposition, and service referrals including placement changes, safety planning, family preservation, and community resources, with a summary letter delivered to the provider after case closure.
No Intervention: Comparison Care
CPS caseworkers will be randomized to collaborative or comparison practice. For any infant investigated by a caseworker in the comparison practice, the caseworkers will conduct a standard CPS investigation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Infant Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months following CPS case closure
Difference in Change in Infant Health Related Quality of Life based on practice arm
Change from baseline to 6 months following CPS case closure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parent Perception of Child Welfare and Child Health Care
Time Frame: at baseline (child welfare) and at 6 months (child health care)
Difference in parent perceptions of child welfare and child health care based on practice arm
at baseline (child welfare) and at 6 months (child health care)
Repeat Child Welfare Involvement
Time Frame: 6 months after CPS case closure
Repeat Child Welfare Involvement
6 months after CPS case closure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Engagement of child welfare caseworkers
Time Frame: baseline
Proportion of eligible cases investigated that were offered collaborative practice
baseline
Acceptance of parents
Time Frame: baseline
Proportion of cases offered collaborative practice in which parents allowed practice
baseline
Recruiting and retention of high-risk longitudinal cohort
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months
Proportion of eligible cases willing to enroll in and follow-up with researchers
baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristine A Campbell, MD, MSc, University of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00098047

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Abuse

Clinical Trials on Collaborative Care

3
Subscribe