TBI Care: Collaborative Care for Pain After Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

October 31, 2022 updated by: Jeanne Hoffman, University of Washington

The Effectiveness of Collaborative Care Versus Usual Care for Pain After Traumatic Brain Injury

The purpose of this study is to (1) test the benefits of the patient-centered collaborative care treatment approach for persons who have had a TBI and who have pain, including headache; and also (2) test whether this approach improves quality of life, patient satisfaction, adherence to other treatments, and quality of care in the TBI care system.

This project uses the contextual paradigm of disability to analyze and improve outpatient treatment of pain, including headache, in people who have had a TBI. Issues of restricted access and health care system complexity likely contribute to sub-optimal treatment of chronic pain. Therefore, the investigators seek to enhance real-world outpatient healthcare delivery through a patient-centered, collaborative care approach to treating chronic pain. The intervention is structured to reduce pain interference directly and indirectly through improved management of pain and comorbid conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, and sleep difficulties) that can amplify pain perception and disability. In addition, change in the system of care may reduce burden on the emergency department. The investigators have heard from our clinician and patient partners that poor pain management often leads to emergency department visits, and this has also been reported in the literature.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Screening

Potential participants may be referred to the study by clinical staff, self-refer based on seeing study brochures or flyers, or will be invited to participate based on review of medical records of patients scheduled for TBI clinics at Harborview Medical Center (HMC) or the University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) Rehabilitation TBI clinics.

If a potential participant meets initial eligibility criteria of having a diagnosis of TBI and reports of chronic pain, a research staff member will contact the patient to confirm eligibility through a formalized Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved screening questionnaire. The Six-Item Screener (a brief and reliable instrument for identifying cognitive impairment) will be used to determine if the participant is cognitively able to provide informed consent.

Once eligibility is confirmed, research staff will introduce the study using a talking points script, and if the potential participant is interested, provide a brochure and a consent form. Potential participants will be fully informed of all risks and benefits prior to giving their written informed consent and prior to enrollment in the study. They may take time to think about participating and render a decision in a subsequent call or visit. Potential participants will be asked to repeat back understanding of this material as necessary.

Research staff will also review a HIPAA authorization form with the participant that permits research staff to collect data from the participant's medical records regarding injury and medical history.

The investigators plan to enroll a total of 158 participants with the goal of outcomes assessment on 63 subjects in each arm (total of 126).

Basic Demographic Information

Basic demographic information including age, sex, and race will be collected via medical record review without consent from all patients including those who do not enroll to determine differences between enrolled patients participants and those who do not enroll to examine potential bias.

Procedures

Randomization

Once enrolled, participants will be randomized into one of two groups: usual care (UC) or Collaborative Care (CC). Those randomized to CC treatment group will work with Collaborative Care Manager (CCM) for up to 12 contacts over a 16 week treatment period, and complete a 24 week post randomization check in call with CCM.

Participants assigned to the UC arm will be informed of the assignment via phone by an un-blinded research team member. In addition, participants assigned to the UC arm will receive a letter explaining the assignment. Participants assigned to the CC arm will be contacted by the CCM to arrange the timing of their first treatment session.

Data Collection

Participants may choose to have the interview/s administered by phone or in person at either UWMC or HMC by our research staff member.

Baseline Interview:

Contact Information - Research staff will collect the following information from participants: (1) contact information; (2) best way to reach an individual if they have more than one line; best times/days to reach participant; and (3) names and contact information of people staff are allowed to contact if participant is lost to follow-up or otherwise cannot be contacted (i.e. collateral contacts). The purpose of this is to maximize the likelihood of reaching a participant to complete the study procedures. Furthermore, asking permission to leave a voicemail on at a specified contact number ensures a greater level of privacy for the participant.

Data Collection - Baseline will take approximately 30 minutes to complete and includes demographic variables, TBI variables (date of injury, TBI severity), medications and information describing participants' pain history, including pain sites, and pain duration. The Brief Pain Intensity measure (BPI), a 4 item pain intensity scale, will be asked 4 times over the course of 7 days at each assessment period.

Follow-up Interviews:

Follow-up interviews will be collected at 4-months and 8-months post-randomization and will each take approximately 45 minutes each.

Collaborative Care

Collaborative Care (CC) is a systematic and integrated approach to improving the delivery and utilization of effective treatments for chronic pain. The care will be delivered through an interdisciplinary team, organized around a CC Manager (CCM) who guides the participant through various aspects of care. The team will include a group of experts on pain and TBI. The CCM will offer all participants care management, collaborative medical management, and psychosocial treatment. If the participant declines to receive any of the components of the intervention, they may still choose to participate in the remaining components.

Usual Care Group

Participants assigned to usual care will be encouraged to consult with their TBI or primary care provider with any concerns around pain treatment. Study personnel will not make any attempts to influence usual care participants' pain management.

Because this is an effectiveness study, treatment decisions for UC participants will be left to the primary provider and may or may not include pharmacologic management, counseling, and referral to specialty services or other local resources.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

158

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • Harborview Medical Center, TBI Clinic
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington Medical Center, TBI Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Definitive diagnosis of mild to severe TBI based on medical chart review;
  • Patient has an appointment with the University of Washington/Harborview Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine's TBI clinics or has been seen by TBI providers within the last 12 months;
  • Patient reports clinically significant pain, defined as having moderate or higher pain over the last 6 months (defined as an average pain score of 4-10/10 on a 0=no pain to 10=worst pain numeric rating scale);
  • Patient is "somewhat" or "very" willing to accept additional help with their pain as asked during screening;
  • Reads and English speaking (we will track non-enrollment due to other language to determine common languages)
  • Has access to and ability to communicate over the phone;
  • Aged >18 years of age;
  • Provides written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Answers more than one incorrect response on the Six-Item Screener;
  • Terminal illness or pain associated with cancer diagnosis;
  • Major surgery anticipated during study period (approximately 8 months);
  • Presence of severe psychiatric disorder as evidenced by high suicide risk, diagnosis of bipolar disorder with psychotic features or current psychotic disorder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
If assigned to the Usual Care (UC) arm, participants receive the same care as they would normally received from the HMC or UWMC outpatient TBI clinics, which could include similar types of treatment (medication changes, referral to specialists, etc.).
Active Comparator: Collaborative Care
If assigned to the Collaborative Care (CC) arm, participants receive up to 12 sessions (45-60 minutes) of scheduled contacts with a Collaborative Care Manager (CCM) over 16 weeks of treatment. The CCM meets weekly for supervision with a team of experts to determine appropriate care.

Up to 12 phone sessions over 16 weeks from Collaborative Care Manager (CCM).

Session 1: Establish rapport, perform structured clinical assessment explain the rationale and parameters of the intervention, provide brief education on pain and together with the participant create an overall treatment plan and detailed follow-up plan.

Sessions 2-12 Components:

  • Care Management Weekly monitoring of response to treatment using standardized measures.
  • Collaborative Medical Management: Optimized management of problem areas. Medication recommendations will follow evidence-based treatment algorithms with consultation of supervisors.
  • Psychosocial Treatment: Evidence based, focus on pain self-management skills/education, initially on foundational skills including: (1) pain education; (2) relaxation skills training; (3) behavioral activation and goal setting; 4) importance of physical activity and (5) motivational interviewing to promote adherence to healthcare and goals.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from enrollment to end of treament (month 4) in Pain Interference Scale from the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4
A 7-item scale which measures pain interference with general activity, mood, walking, work (outside or in home), relationships, sleep, and enjoyment of life on numerical rating scales (NRS) from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interferes completely).
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)-Change is being assessed.
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
A measure of depression severity that parallels DSM-5 criteria and has established reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change in people with TBI.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 item (GAD-7) - Change is being assessed.
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
A measure of general anxiety.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI) - Change is being assessed.
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
The PSQI contains 19 items covering 7 dimensions of sleep plus a composite score.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Brief Pain Intensity- 4 (BPI-4) - Change is being assessed.
Time Frame: Collected 4 times in one week over the course of 7 days at enrollment period, Month 4, Month 8
A 4-item pain intensity scale in past week (current, worst, average, least).
Collected 4 times in one week over the course of 7 days at enrollment period, Month 4, Month 8
Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction (PGATS) - Change is being assessed.
Time Frame: Collected at Month 4, Month 8
A 3 item measure that rates satisfaction with care received.
Collected at Month 4, Month 8
Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective 17 - Change is being assessed.
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
The PART-O-17 is a patient-reported measure of involvement in life situations at the societal level as reflected in fulfillment of developmentally and culturally appropriate roles such as worker, student, spouse, parent, or citizen.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Cornell Service Index (CSI) - Change is being assessed.
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
A standardized measure of the quantity and characteristics (for example, site and provider) of health services used.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Visits To Regional Emergency Departments (ED) - Change is being assessed.
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Count of visits to regional emergency departments in the last 4 months.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Change from enrollment to 4 months post randomization (month 8) in Pain Interference Scale from the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 8
A 7-item scale which measures pain interference with general activity, mood, walking, work (outside or in home), relationships, sleep, and enjoyment of life on numerical rating scales (NRS) from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interferes completely).
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 8
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8)
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
An 8-item measure looking at the acceptance of chronic pain
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
DFAQ-CU Inventory
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
DFAQ-CU is a 4-item measure and stands for daily sessions, frequency, age of onset, and quantity of cannabis use.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
AUDIT-C
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
A 3-item alcohol screen that can help identify persons who have active alcohol use disorders.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
The two-Item Conjoint Screen (TICS)
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
A two-Item Conjoint Screen, is composed of two questions on alcohol/drug use in the past year and feeling the need to cut down on this use.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
A self-report measure which reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)
Time Frame: Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8
Measures different types of pain people may experience.
Collected at 0-14 days of enrollment, Month 4, Month 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeanne M Hoffman, PhD, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Collaborative Care

3
Subscribe