Evaluation of the Potential Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Probe Drugs in the Geneva Phenotyping Cocktail

February 6, 2017 updated by: Jules Desmeules

Phenotyping is an approach largely used for the evaluation of the activity of cytochromes and transporters in vivo. It consists of the administration of probe substances metabolised by a specific cytochrome or transported by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) for example, followed by the determination of a metabolic ratio or the evaluation of the plasmatic or urinary concentrations of the probe substances. The administration of a cocktail containing several probe substances allows the simultaneous evaluation of the activity of several cytochromes and P-gp in a single test.

When a cocktail approach is used it is important to make sure that no drug-drug interactions occur between the probes within the cocktail. The validation of the lack of interactions, which is the aim of the study, consists of demonstrating that there is no difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters and/or metabolic ratios when a probe is administered alone or as part of the cocktail. The Geneva cocktail consists of caffeine, bupropion, flurbiprofen, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, midazolam and fexofenadine for the simultaneous phenotyping of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CAP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and P-gp, respectively.

Probe and metabolite concentrations will be measured in capillary blood using a dried blood spot (DBS) analysis. To further facilitate sampling, a new simple device will be used to ensure the precision of capillary blood collection.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Genève, Switzerland, 1211
        • Centre de Recherche Clinique, HUG, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy volunteers aged from 18 to 60 years
  • BMI between 18 and 27
  • Understanding of French language and able to give a written inform consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • smoker
  • pregnant women
  • taking drugs which alter cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity
  • renal or hepatic impairment
  • medical history of chronic alcoholism or abuse of psychoactive drugs
  • liver transplantation
  • sensitivity to any of the drugs used
  • Alteration of hepatic tests, more than 2x normal (aspartate transaminase >100U/L ; alanine transaminase >100 units/L ; gamma-glutamyl transferase >80 units/L ; bilirubin >50µmol/L)
  • Presenting genetic polymorphism of poor CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 metabolizer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment A

Oral intake of:

caffeine 50 mg dextromethorphan 10 mg omeprazole 10 mg flurbiprofen 10 mg midazolam 1 mg

Experimental: Treatment B

Oral intake of:

fexofenadine 25 mg

Experimental: Treatment C

Oral intake of:

bupropion 20 mg

Experimental: Treatment D

Oral Intake of Geneva cocktail (A+B+C):

caffeine 50 mg dextromethorphan 10 mg omeprazole 10 mg flurbiprofen 10 mg midazolam 1 mg fexofenadine 25 mg bupropion 20 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of caffeine
Time Frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of caffeine AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of dextromethorphan
Time Frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of dextromethorphan AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of flurbiprofen
Time Frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of flurbiprofen AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of midazolam
Time Frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of midazolam AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of omeprazole
Time Frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of omeprazole AUC when treatment A or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of fexofenadine
Time Frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment B or D
Comparison of fexofenadine AUC when treatment B or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment B or D
Area under the capillary blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of bupropion
Time Frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post treatment C or D
Comparison of bupropion AUC when treatment C or D is administered
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post treatment C or D

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Metabolic ratio (MR) of paraxanthine blood concentration /caffeine blood concentration
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of paraxanthine/caffeine MRs between treatment A and D
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Metabolic ratio (MR) of dextrorphan blood concentration /dextromethorphan blood concentration
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of dextrorphan/dextromethorphan MRs between treatment A and D
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Metabolic ratio (MR) of 4-hydroxyflurbiprofen blood concentration /flurbiprofen blood concentration
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of 4-hydroxyflurbiprofen/flurbiprofen MRs between treatment A and D
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Metabolic ratio (MR) of 1-hydroxymidazolam blood concentration /midazolam blood concentration
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of 1-hydroxymidazolam/midazolam MRs between treatment A and D
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Metabolic ratio (MR) of 5-hydroxyomeprazole blood concentration /omeprazole blood concentration
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Comparison of 5-hydroxyomeprazole/omeprazole MRs between treatment A and D
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A or D
Metabolic ratio (MR) of 4-hydroxybupropion blood concentration /bupropion blood concentration
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post treatment C or D
Comparison of 4-hydroxybupropion/bupropion MRs between treatment C and D
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post treatment C or D
Number of adverse events
Time Frame: at each drug administration day
at each drug administration day

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Correlation of drug concentrations (ng/ml) in DBS obtained with two sampling techniques for all administered drugs
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A, B, C and D
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post treatment A, B, C and D

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Drug Interaction

Clinical Trials on Bupropion

3
Subscribe