Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine to Decrease Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration

January 4, 2017 updated by: Christopher Pruitt, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine to Decrease Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

The purpose of this study was to establish whether premedication with topical lidocaine would reduce the pain associated with IN midazolam administration in children. The study was designed to be a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial performed in an urban, academic pediatric emergency department.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This was a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial performed in an urban, academic pediatric emergency department with an annual census of 67,000 patients. Children 6-12 years old for whom IN midazolam was ordered were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomly assigned an identical intranasal medication (4% Lidocaine or 0.9% saline). Patients were administered the study drug followed by IN midazolam. Patients then assigned a pain score for midazolam administration using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating scale. The primary endpoint of pain score was analyzed with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 6-12
  • Previously healthy
  • Attending physician concludes that the patient would benefit from administration of an anxiolysis medication prior to a minor procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe asthma or other chronic lung disease
  • Co-morbid conditions including cerebral palsy, developmental delay, or other chronic illness deemed by the Attending physician to be unsafe to receive anxiolysis with Versed.
  • Any child presenting with a life-threatening condition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intranasal Lidocaine
Patient to receive 4% lidocaine intranasally prior to midazolam
Administered intranasally prior to Midazolam administration.
Other Names:
  • Xylocaine
Administered to all patients immediately after study drug (Lidocaine or Placebo) administered.
Other Names:
  • Versed
Placebo Comparator: Intranasal 0.9% saline
Patient to receive 0.9% Saline intranasally prior to midazolam
Administered to all patients immediately after study drug (Lidocaine or Placebo) administered.
Other Names:
  • Versed
Administered intranasally prior to Midazolam administration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration
Time Frame: immediately after administration of intranasal midazolam
subject self-reports pain with intranasal midazolam utilizing the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale. This scale is a well-established ordinal pain scale for pediatric patients. It is one score (no subscales), with a minimum score of 0 (signifying "No Hurt") and a maximum score of 10 ("Hurts Worst"). Values between include 2 ("Hurts Little Bit"), 4 ("Hurts Little More"), 6 ("Hurts Even More"), and 8 ("Hurts Whole Lot."). Children indicate one value/answer. Thus, a higher score indicates a worse outcome (more pain).
immediately after administration of intranasal midazolam

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Smith, MD, UAB Department of Pediatrics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine

Subscribe