- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02408237
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Apparatus for Domiciliary Use
December 21, 2017 updated by: Wolnei Caumo, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Development of Apparatus of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Domiciliary Use
Neuromodulation is characterized as a technique whose principle neurostimulation to produce inhibition or cortical arousal.
The tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) is a noninvasive brain stimulation method used to modulate cortical excitability using low intensity direct current (1-2mA) directed to the scalp via cathodes and anodes electrodes; the current reaches the cortex, producing hyperpolarization or depolarization of the axonal membrane potential.
Evidence has shown that this method is presented as a technique that can alter cortical and subcortical neural networks.
This technique has been used to treat psychiatric disorders such as depression, acute mania, bipolar affective disorder panic, hallucinations, obsessive compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, withdrawal, rehabilitation after-stroke and pain syndromes such as neuropathic pain, migraine, pancreatitis chronic pain and fibromyalgia.
It is low-cost technique, with virtually no side effects and carries the therapeutic effect by neuromodulatory pathways by distinct pathways activated by the drugs.
In this scenario falls within the importance of developing devices for home use, inexpensive, and easy to use so as to maintain the benefits observed in previous studies.
The tDCS is presented as a non-pharmacological option that may be offered in this context in society.
It is noteworthy that, if the benefit is demonstrated, the impact will be of great importance to patients and to society, since these are focal techniques and low cost.
Because they have no focal adverse effects of conventional drug treatments.
Additionally, can be constituted as technical additive to pharmacotherapy in so much pain as in the treatment of other neuropsychiatric disorders.
Therefore, further studies should be encouraged to increase knowledge of their effects and mechanisms involved.
If the effectiveness of this method for home use is confirmed, the therapeutic impact will undoubtedly be of great importance.
However, to make this project come true, the investigators depend on support for the development and validation of tDCS device for home use, so allowing the qualified knowledge can be applied to the clinical setting, as well as advance the development of this area of neuroscience in Brazil.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop tDCS device for home use.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
15
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Rio Grande Do SUL
-
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do SUL, Brazil, 90035-903
- Fabiana Carvalho
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women, aged between 18 and 40 years.
- Higher education (college graduates in progress or completed).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject left-handed.
- History of neurological disease.
- History of endocrine disease.
- History of psychiatric disorder.
- History of sleep disorders (apnea, hypersomnia, insomnia, sleepwalking ...).
- Chronic pain.
- Chronic inflammatory and oncological diseases.
- Systemic arterial hypertension; ischemic heart disease.
- Kidney and liver failure.
- Regular use of steroids and non-steroids anti inflammatory, opioids and non-opioids, psychotropics, anticonvulsants, alpha and beta-blockers.
- Regular use of drugs, alcohol and tobacco.
- History of brain surgery, tumor, stroke or intracranial implantation of metal (or not implemented).
- Subjects who do not understand Portuguese.
- Body mass index greater than 29.9.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: tDCS Ambulatory & Sham
Active tDCS Ambulatory: 1 mA of current of active tDCS applied for 20 minutes, single session of stimulation.
Sham tDCS Ambulatory: applied for 20 minutes, single session of stimulation.
|
Procedure begins with the placement of an anode electrode placed on the primary motor cortex (cortex contralateral to the dominant) and the cathode is placed on the contralateral supraorbital region.
It is used 1mA direct current transcranial stimulation applied for 20 minutes.
Will be held a single session of stimulation.
The total time, with initial assessment, tDCS session and final evaluation will be approximately 4 hours.
Other Names:
In sham group, we follow the same procedure and time as the active tDCS ambulatory protocol, but the device will be in the mode sham (inactive).
The current is only applied for 30 seconds, so subjects feel a sense of the initial stimulation, but not the remainder receive current.
In this group one session will also be held.
The total time, with initial assessment, tDCS session and final evaluation will be approximately 4 hours.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: tDCS home use & Sham
Active tDCS home use: 11 active tDCS sessions: single session in the hospital and the remaining 10 in the subject's home, with duration of each active tDCS session of 20 min.
Sham tDCS home use: 11 sessions of tDCS: single session in the hospital and the remaining 10 in the subject's home, with duration of each sham tDCS session of 20 min.
|
The procedure and stimulation time is exactly the same that Active tDCS - ambulatory use, but will use the apparatus for domestic use.
Will be explained to the participant as placement of the cap and the device management.
This group will be made 11 sessions of tDCS, the first held in the Hospital, with supervision of the researcher.
The remaining 10 will be held in the participant's home.
The total time of the first meeting, with initial assessment, tDCS session and final evaluation will be around 4 hours.
The time of last evaluation is approximately 1 hour.
Other Names:
The procedure and stimulation time is exactly the same that Active tDCS - ambulatory use, but will use the apparatus for domestic use.
In sham group, we follow the same procedure and time as the active tDCS protocol, but the device will be in the sham mode (inactive).
The total time of the first meeting, with initial assessment, tDCS session and final evaluation will be around 4 hours.
The time of last evaluation is approximately 1 hour.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cortical excitability on the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Time Frame: 2 days
|
Evaluation of the variation in cortical excitability parameters pre and post application of tDCS: Motor evoked potential (MEP); Motor threshold (MT); intracortical facilitation, intracortical inhibition, silent period (SP).
|
2 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Serum levels of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF)
Time Frame: 2 days
|
Measurement of serum levels of BDNF pre and post application of tDCS.
|
2 days
|
Pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: 2 days
|
Measurement of pressure pain threshold pre and post application of tDCS.
|
2 days
|
Heat pain threshold
Time Frame: 2 days
|
Measurement of heat pain threshold pre and post application of tDCS, with quantitative sensory test (QST).
|
2 days
|
Conditional pain modulation (CPM)
Time Frame: 2 days
|
Assessment of conditional pain modulation pre and post application of tDCS, with cold and hot threshold.
|
2 days
|
Number of participants with adverse events after use tDCS
Time Frame: 10 days
|
Assessment of adverse events after use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Apparatus for Domiciliary Use.
|
10 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Wolnei Caumo, PhD, +55513359808
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
- Fregni F, Freedman S, Pascual-Leone A. Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Feb;6(2):188-91. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70032-7.
- Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001 Nov 27;57(10):1899-901. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899.
- Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
- Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.023. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
- Nitsche MA, Fricke K, Henschke U, Schlitterlau A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Henning S, Tergau F, Paulus W. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J Physiol. 2003 Nov 15;553(Pt 1):293-301. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916. Epub 2003 Aug 29.
- Iyer MB, Mattu U, Grafman J, Lomarev M, Sato S, Wassermann EM. Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. Neurology. 2005 Mar 8;64(5):872-5. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152986.07469.E9.
- Liebetanz D, Koch R, Mayenfels S, Konig F, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;120(6):1161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.01.022. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
- Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614.
- DaSilva AF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Fregni F. Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation. J Vis Exp. 2011 May 23;(51):2744. doi: 10.3791/2744.
- Priori A. Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;114(4):589-95. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00437-6.
- Rolke R, Magerl W, Campbell KA, Schalber C, Caspari S, Birklein F, Treede RD. Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain. 2006 Jan;10(1):77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.003.
- Lang N, Siebner HR, Ward NS, Lee L, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN, Frackowiak RS. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(2):495-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04233.x.
- Medeiros LF, de Souza IC, Vidor LP, de Souza A, Deitos A, Volz MS, Fregni F, Caumo W, Torres IL. Neurobiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: a review. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 28;3:110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00110. eCollection 2012.
- Fregni F, Gimenes R, Valle AC, Ferreira MJ, Rocha RR, Natalle L, Bravo R, Rigonatti SP, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Boggio PS. A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec;54(12):3988-98. doi: 10.1002/art.22195.
- Bikson M, Datta A, Elwassif M. Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;120(6):1033-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.018. Epub 2009 Apr 24. No abstract available.
- Martin DM, Alonzo A, Ho KA, Player M, Mitchell PB, Sachdev P, Loo CK. Continuation transcranial direct current stimulation for the prevention of relapse in major depression. J Affect Disord. 2013 Jan 25;144(3):274-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
- Valiengo L, Bensenor IM, Goulart AC, de Oliveira JF, Zanao TA, Boggio PS, Lotufo PA, Fregni F, Brunoni AR. The sertraline versus electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study (select-TDCS): results of the crossover and follow-up phases. Depress Anxiety. 2013 Jul;30(7):646-53. doi: 10.1002/da.22079. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
- Garcia-Larrea L, Peyron R, Mertens P, Gregoire MC, Lavenne F, Le Bars D, Convers P, Mauguiere F, Sindou M, Laurent B. Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study. Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):259-73. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00114-1.
- Silva G, Miksad R, Freedman SD, Pascual-Leone A, Jain S, Gomes DL, Amancio EJ, Boggio PS, Correa CF, Fregni F. Treatment of cancer pain with noninvasive brain stimulation. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Oct;34(4):342-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.06.002. No abstract available.
- Drewes AM, Gregersen H, Arendt-Nielsen L. Experimental pain in gastroenterology: a reappraisal of human studies. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003 Nov;38(11):1115-30. doi: 10.1080/00365520310004399. No abstract available.
- Boggio PS, Zaghi S, Lopes M, Fregni F. Modulatory effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on perception and pain thresholds in healthy volunteers. Eur J Neurol. 2008 Oct;15(10):1124-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02270.x. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
- Minhas P, Bansal V, Patel J, Ho JS, Diaz J, Datta A, Bikson M. Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS. J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Jul 15;190(2):188-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 May 19.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 28, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 31, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
October 17, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 2, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
April 3, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 26, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 21, 2017
Last Verified
March 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 14-0281
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy Participants
-
PfizerRecruitingHealthy Subjects | Healthy ParticipantsUnited States
-
Insmed IncorporatedRecruitingHealthy ParticipantsUnited States
-
Aeovian Pharmaceuticals, Inc.RecruitingHealthy ParticipantsAustralia
-
Suzhou Zelgen Biopharmaceuticals Co.,LtdRecruitingHealthy ParticipantsChina
-
CelgeneNot yet recruitingHealthy ParticipantsUnited States
-
Bristol-Myers SquibbRecruiting
-
AstraZenecaParexelRecruiting
-
ProMis Neurosciences, IncRecruiting
-
Novo Nordisk A/SRecruitingHealthy ParticipantsCanada
-
Novo Nordisk A/SRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Active tDCS Ambulatory
-
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteCompleted
-
The University of Texas at DallasActive, not recruiting
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
The University of Texas at DallasCompleted
-
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education...Active, not recruitingChronic StrokeTurkey
-
University of LiegeCompletedDisorders of ConsciousnessBelgium
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalFundação Faculdade de MedicinaCompleted
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentActive, not recruitingChronic Spinal Cord DisorderTurkey
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalCompletedPelvic Pain | Pancreatitis | Visceral PainUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Milken InstituteRecruiting