Adductor Canal Block and Recovery After Total Knee Replacement Surgery (ACB in TKA)

November 21, 2017 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Adductor Canal Block and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to compare the functional recovery of patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty based on the administration of an adductor canal block during their anesthesia treatment

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The period after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery is known to be painful for the first 24 hours, lasting up to 3 days in many cases. Successful management of pain after TKR is regarded as necessary to early recovery, rehabilitation and timely discharge. Severe pain following major joint arthroplasty can hinder early rehabilitation, may result in prolonged hospitalization and is a strong predictor of persistent pain beyond 3 months. Adequate analgesia following TKR is paramount to early recovery, rehabilitation and timely discharge. Therefore early postoperative analgesic and rehabilitation goals are intricately related.

Until now, different methods of pain treatment have been used, including intravenous narcotic pain medication, continuous femoral nerve block (numbing medication to a nerve in the thigh) and epidural analgesia (identical to the numbing method for childbirth). These are all effective methods but each is limited by side effects. In recent years, research has focused on administering local anesthetic further down in the leg, trying to minimize quadriceps muscle weakness while giving adequate pain relief after surgery. Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) and Adductor Canal Block (ACB) are examples of new farther sites of administration.

The purpose of this study is to determine which combination of analgesic interventions is the most effective treatment for pain and improvement in functional outcome for TKR.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
        • Toronto Western Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I-III
  • 18 - 80 years of age
  • BMI 18 - 40
  • Scheduled for elective total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia
  • Able to ambulate independently with a standard wheeled walker as maximum mobility aid

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision knee arthroplasty
  • Bilateral knee arthroplasty
  • Lack of mental ability to provide informed consent
  • Neuropathic pain or sensory disorders of the surgical limb
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia (intolerance to the study drugs, bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, malignancy or infection at the site of block)
  • Chronic opioid use defined as > 30 mg of daily oral morphine equivalents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Local Inflitration Only

This group will receive LIA and saline solution (placebo) in the adductor canal block with NO morphine in the spinal anesthesia:

  • 30 ml normal saline
  • 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine
30 ml normal saline in the adductor canal along with a spinal anesthesia of 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine, in addition to the local infiltration.
Other Names:
  • saline
Active Comparator: Adductor Canal Block

This group will receive LIA and the standard local anesthetic in the ACB with NO morphine in the spinal anesthetic:

  • ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:400,000 epinephrine
  • 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine
Use of ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:400,000 epinephrine in the adductor canal along with a spinal anesthesia of 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine.
Other Names:
  • ropivacaine with epinephrine
Active Comparator: Adductor Canal Block with Morphine

This group will receive LIA with local anesthetic in the ACB and morphine in the spinal anesthetic:

  • ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:400,000 epinephrine
  • 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine with 100mcg of intrathecal morphine (0.1ml of intrathecal morphine 1mg/ml)
Use of ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:400,000 epinephrine in the adductor canal along with a spinal anesthesia of 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine and 100mcg of intrathecal morphine (0.1ml of intrathecal morphine 1mg/ml)
Other Names:
  • ropivacaine with epinephrine and spinal intrathecal morphine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: 2-3 days post srugery
TUG test reflects the time it takes a subject to stand up from a standard height armchair, walk 3 meters, walk back to the chair and sit down. It intends to assess a patient's global mobility as well as balance and risk of falling.
2-3 days post srugery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain outcome - NRS
Time Frame: 2-3 days post surgery
a) Pain scores assessed with an 11 point verbal numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable", both at rest and during active physiotherapy (measured daily for 3 days post-operatively) .
2-3 days post surgery
Analgesic outcomes - Cumulative systemic opioid consumption
Time Frame: 2-3 days post surgery
Cumulative systemic opioid consumption measured as oral morphine mg equivalents (daily for 3 days post-operatively).
2-3 days post surgery
Analgesic outcomes - Proportion of patients who required "rescue" intravenous patient controlled analgesia
Time Frame: 2-3 days post surgery
Proportion of patients who required "rescue" intravenous patient controlled analgesia (iv PCA) anytime in the post-operative period.
2-3 days post surgery
Analgesic outcomes - Incidence of opioid-related side effects
Time Frame: 2-3 days post surgery
Incidence of opioid-related side effects
2-3 days post surgery
Secondary short-term physical and performance-based functional outcome measures - Proportion of patients achieving knee flexion range of motion (ROM) of 90 degrees
Time Frame: 2-3 days post surgery
Proportion of patients achieving knee flexion range of motion (ROM) of 90 degrees (measured daily for 3 days post-operatively)
2-3 days post surgery
Secondary short-term physical and performance-based functional outcome measures - Distance walked
Time Frame: 2-3 days post surgery
Distance walked
2-3 days post surgery
Secondary short-term physical and performance-based functional outcome measures - Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: 2-3 days post surgery
Hospital length of stay
2-3 days post surgery
Secondary short-term physical and performance-based functional outcome measures - Discharge destination
Time Frame: 2-3 days post surgery
Discharge destination (home or rehabilitation facility)
2-3 days post surgery
Medium-term self-reported functional outcome measures - WOMAC
Time Frame: baseline and 2-3 days post surgery
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) measured at baseline and at 3 months post-operatively
baseline and 2-3 days post surgery
Medium-term self-reported functional outcome measures - LEFS
Time Frame: baseline and 2-3 days post surgery
Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) measured at baseline and at 3 months post-operatively.
baseline and 2-3 days post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anahi Perlas, MD, University of Toronto. University Health Network. Toronto Western Hospital.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Knee Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on Local Infiltration

Subscribe