Comparison Between Radiofrequency and Balloon Compression in the Treatment of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia

February 11, 2020 updated by: Hugo Sterman Neto, University of Sao Paulo

Comparative Study Between Radiofrequency and Balloon Compression of the Gasserian Ganglion in the Treatment of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia

Two percutaneous procedures used in the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia are analysed. The effects on pain relief, alterations in cutaneous sensibility and olfactory and salivatory functions are analysed as well.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients diagnosed with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, refractory or intolerant to medical treatment, are randomly assigned (after signing a consent form), to receive one of two percutaneous procedures. The patients are evaluated a week before and a week, a month, two months, three months and six months after the surgery.

The questionnaires (Short-Form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire - SF-MPQ, Douleur Neuropathique - DN4, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory - NPSI, Brief Pain Inventory - BPI, Global Clinical Impression - GCI, Hospital Anxiety and Depression - HAD, Brief World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire - WHOQOL-brief, Pain Catastrophizing Scale - PCS) and tests (Quantitative Sensory Testing - QST, olfactory threshold - OT - and discrimination - OD, taste threshold - TT, and salivatory quantification - SQ) are applied as follows:

  • Pre-op evaluation: SF-MPQ, DN4, BPI, NPSI, HAD, WHOQOL-brief, PCS, QST, OT, OD, TT, SQ.
  • First visit post-op: SF-MPQ, BPI, NPSI, GCI
  • Second visit post-op: SF-MPQ, BPI, NPSI, GCI
  • Third visit post-op: SF-MPQ, BPI, NPSI, GCI
  • Fourth visit post-op: SF-MPQ, DN4, BPI, NPSI, GCI, WHOQOL-brief, HAD, PCS, QST, OT, TT, SQ.
  • Fifth visit post-op: SF-MPQ, DN4, BPI, NPSI, GCI, WHOQOL-brief, HAD, PCS, QST, OT, OD, TT, SQ.

Patients with pain recurrence are excluded after the last visit attended. An exploratory analysis is made with 30 patients for a proper sample size calculation during the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05403000
        • HCFMSUP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia
  • Refractory/Intolerable medical treatment
  • Pain restricted to second or third trigeminal division

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary Trigeminal Neuralgia
  • Pain restricted to the first trigeminal division
  • Refuse to participate
  • Unable to comprehend the questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Balloon Compression Rhizotomy
Patients that are submitted to Balloon Compression Rhizotomy
The balloon compression rhizotomy is performed in a percutaneous fashion where a Fogarty catheter is positioned in the gasserian ganglion and inflated with 0,7 milliliters of radiopaque dye during 120 seconds.
Active Comparator: Radiofrequency Thermal Coagulation Rhizotomy
Patients that are submitted to Radiofrequency Thermal Coagulation Rhizotomy
The gasserian ganglion is submitted to a controlled thermal coagulation with a electrode with 80 Celsius degrees of temperature during 60 seconds on the specific division.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain relief using numeric rating scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Worst pain in the last 24h scale in the Brief Pain Inventory
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in how the pain is perceived by the patient assessed by the Short-Form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
Short-Form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire
6 months
Changes in neuropathic pain quality assessed by Douleur Neuropatique 4
Time Frame: 6 months
Douleur Neuropatique 4
6 months
Evaluation of chronic pain and its influence in patients life assessed by Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: 6 months
Brief Pain Inventory
6 months
Changes in types of symptoms of neuropathic pain assessed by Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: 6 months
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory
6 months
Changes in quality of life assessed by World Health Organization Quality of Life - brief form
Time Frame: 6 months
World Health Organization Quality of Life - brief form
6 months
Both patient and investigator impression in the treatment assessed by Global Clinical Impression
Time Frame: 6 months
Global Clinical Impression
6 months
Evaluation of how pain affects patients perception assessed by Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
6 months
Onset of changes in anxiety or depression assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: 6 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression
6 months
Quantification of facial sensibility changes assessed by Quantitative Sensorial Testing
Time Frame: 6 months
Quantitative Sensorial Testing
6 months
Changes in olfactory threshold assessed by isopropanol solution
Time Frame: 6 months
Olfactory Threshold using isopropanol solution
6 months
Changes in gustatory threshold assessed using sweet, sour, salty and bitter solutions
Time Frame: 6 months
Gustatory Threshold using sweet, sour, salty and bitter solutions
6 months
Changes in salivary flow assessed using cotton weights
Time Frame: 6 months
Evaluation of salivary flow using cotton weights
6 months
Changes in olfactory discrimination assessed using Sniffin' Sticks
Time Frame: 6 months
Using Sniffin' Sticks to evaluate olfactory discrimination
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Daniel Ciampi, MD, PhD, HCFMSUP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trigeminal Neuralgia

Clinical Trials on Balloon Compression Rhizotomy

Subscribe