- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02428699
Study Comparing Blood Levels of Fatty Acids After Consuming Two Forms of Cod Liver Oil
June 15, 2018 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
Comparison of Plasma Levels of n-3 Fatty Acids After Ingestion of an Emulsified Cod Liver Oil Product and a Non Emulsified Cod Liver Oil Product
This study is designed to compare the incremental area under the curve from 0 to 24h (iAUC0-24h) of plasma levels of n-3 fatty acids (sum of total and free eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)) after ingestion of an emulsified product and a non-emulsified reference control of free flowing cod liver oil at the lowest appropriate dose that is practically acceptable, and as near as possible to the test products' recommended daily dose.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Many dietary lipids are in the form of triglycerides, ethyl esters or phospholipids.
During digestion these lipids are subject to hydrolysis, in particular by pancreatic triglyceride lipase.
To facilitate the action of the enzyme, lipids are emulsified by the action of bile salts.
By increasing the surface area of the fat globules, emulsification increases access to the lipids by pancreatic triglyceride lipase.
This study is designed to compare iAUC0-24h of plasma levels of n-3 fatty acids (sum of total and free EPA and DHA) after ingestion of an emulsified product and a non-emulsified reference control of free flowing cod liver oil at the lowest appropriate dose that is practically acceptable, and as near as possible to the test products' recommended daily dose.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, NW10 7EW
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 43 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy volunteers aged 18 to 45 years (both inclusive)
- Body mass index (BMI) of 18.5-29.9 kg/m2 inclusive
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Allergy/intolerance to any study material
- Current or recurrent disease, within 12 months of screening that could affect the metabolism of drug
- Participants who have taken any drug known to induce or inhibit hepatic drug metabolism in 30 days prior to screening
- Positive serum Hepatitis B surface antigen, Hepatitis C antibodies or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), alcohol or drug abuse
- Smokers taking >5 cigarettes/day; prior or current use of any other nicotine containing product
- Blood donated within 3 months of screening
- Consumed n-3 rich food or beverage or n-3 fortified food or beverage within 72h prior to each study session
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Test
30mL Test contains 10%w/w cod oil + 10%w/w cod liver oil in an emulsion formulation
|
Participants are required to consume the dose (30 mL) within 1 min, followed by up to 300 mL of apple juice which needs to be consumed within 2 min
|
Active Comparator: Control
5.8mL of cod liver oil in a free flowing non-emulsified formulation
|
Participants are required to consume the dose (5.8 mL) within 1 min, followed by up to 300 mL of apple juice which needs to be consumed within 2 min
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Incremental Area Under the Curve to 24 Hours (h) (iAUC0-24h) of the Sum of Plasma Total and Free n-3 Fatty Acids (Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) and Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA)
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 2
|
The AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method and using nominal time points from 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h respectively.
The AUC was divided by the total duration to represent a weighted mean incremental change over time.
Higher values of AUC demonstrate better rate of absorption over time than lower values.
|
Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
iAUC0-24h of Sum of Total and Free DHA
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 2
|
The AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method and using nominal time points from 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h respectively.
The AUC was divided by the total duration to represent a weighted mean incremental change over time.
Higher values of AUC demonstrate better rate of absorption over time than lower values.
|
Baseline and up to Day 2
|
iAUC0-24h of Sum of Total and Free EPA
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 2
|
The AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method and using nominal time points from 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h respectively.
The AUC was divided by the total duration to represent a weighted mean incremental change over time.
Higher values of AUC demonstrate better rate of absorption over time than lower values.
|
Baseline and up to Day 2
|
iAUC0-10h of Sum of Total and Free DHA
Time Frame: Upto 10 h
|
The AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method and using nominal time points from 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10h respectively.
The AUC was divided by the total duration to represent a weighted mean incremental change over time.
Higher values of AUC demonstrate better rate of absorption over time than lower values.
|
Upto 10 h
|
iAUC0-10h of Sum of Total and Free EPA
Time Frame: Upto 10 h
|
The AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method and using nominal time points from 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10h respectively.
The AUC was divided by the total duration to represent a weighted mean incremental change over time.
Higher values of AUC demonstrate better rate of absorption over time than lower values.
|
Upto 10 h
|
iAUC0-10h of Sum of Total and Free DHA and EPA
Time Frame: Upto 10 h
|
The AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method and using nominal time points from 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10h respectively.
The AUC was divided by the total duration to represent a weighted mean incremental change over time.
Higher values of AUC demonstrate better rate of absorption over time than lower values.
|
Upto 10 h
|
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Sum of Total and Free DHA and EPA
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Blood sampleswere taken at time points 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 and 24h.
Maximum plasma concentration was determined.
|
Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Cmax of Sum of Total and Free DHA
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Blood samples were taken at time points 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 and 24h.
Maximum plasma concentration was determined.
|
Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Cmax of Sum of Total and Free EPA
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Blood sampleswere taken at time points 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 and 24h.
Maximum plasma concentration was determined.
|
Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Sum of Total and Free DHA and EPA
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Blood samples will be taken at time points 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 and 24h.
Time to maximum concentration was determined.
|
Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Tmax of Sum of Total and Free DHA
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Blood samples will be taken at time points 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 and 24h.
Time to maximum concentration was determined.
|
Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Tmax of Sum of Total and Free EPA
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Blood samples will be taken at time points 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 and 24h.Time to maximum concentration was determined.
|
Baseline and up to Day 2
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 20, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 15, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
July 15, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 23, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
April 29, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 28, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 15, 2018
Last Verified
June 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202359
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Growth and Development
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedGrowth & DevelopmentUnited States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedGrowth and DevelopmentIndia
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
DSM Nutritional Products, Inc.Charite University, Berlin, Germany; Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich and other collaboratorsCompletedGrowth and DevelopmentSerbia
-
GlaxoSmithKlineMahajan Imaging CenterCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedGrowth and DevelopmentIndia
-
GlaxoSmithKlineWithdrawn
-
Mead Johnson NutritionCompletedGrowth | Cognitive DevelopmentUnited States
-
Annamalai UniversityJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Global Alliance for Improved... and other collaboratorsUnknownChild Development | Morbidity | Cognitive Development | Physical GrowthBangladesh
-
Société des Produits Nestlé (SPN)Veeva Systems; SAS InstituteNot yet recruitingBrain | Growth & DevelopmentChina
Clinical Trials on Emulsified cod liver oil product
-
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research...TerminatedRheumatoid Arthritis
-
Oslo University HospitalUniversity of Oslo; Norwegian Institute of Public HealthCompleted
-
University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenCompletedFood HypersensitivityDenmark
-
Arkansas Children's Hospital Research InstituteCompleted
-
RDC Clinical Pty LtdCompletedOptimal Gastrointestinal Absorption of Omega-3Australia
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterTop Institute Food and NutritionCompleted
-
University of CopenhagenDanish Research Agency; Technical University of Denmark; HjerteforeningenUnknownMetabolic Syndrome | Cardiovascular Heart DiseaseDenmark
-
King's College LondonUnknownAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)United Kingdom
-
Jordan University of Science and TechnologyCompleted
-
National University of MalaysiaCompleted