Retrospective Evaluation of COPD Patient Care

May 1, 2018 updated by: Kristin Carson, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
The purpose of this project is to evaluate hospital utilisation, patient and service outcomes of a Respiratory Nursing Service to examine current clinical care of COPD. This evaluation aims to identify the important gaps in current clinical care of respiratory chronic disease nursing management. The primary outcomes of this evaluation is to determine the efficacy of clinical care in 2006, 2011, 2013 and 2015 and compare data to current Nursing Best practice guidelines for COPD through the quantification of hospital utilisation for hospital admission, average length of stay, readmission within 28 days, emergency service attendance, outpatient review, use of Hospital and Home (H@H), frequency of exacerbations, disease severity and progression (FEV1: GOLD Classification), number of contacts with the respiratory nursing service and type of contacts with the respiratory nursing service.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Study design: This study is a retrospective observational crosssectional study conducted through review of medical records, internal respiratory databases and electronic hospital patient record (OACIS & HOMER) over 3x12 blocks.

Participants: COPD patients from The Queen Elizabeth Hospital(TQEH) Respiratory Nursing Service who were new patients in 2006, 2011, 2013 and 2015 (Jan 1st to Dec 31st ). Data collection: Demographics, clinical data, hospital service utilisation, and clinical outcomes such as exacerbation frequency and disease progression. All data will be extracted into a standardised data extraction form, which a random subset will be checked by a second researcher.

Demographic data will include comparison of % without comorbidities, impact of comorbid conditions using Charleston Comorbidity index isolating diabetes, heart failure, anxiety and depression. Demographic and descriptive data will be given in means + SD and compared using a two-tailed Student t-test. Categorical variables will be compared using chisquared or Fisher exact tests, and when appropriate the MannWhitney Utest for nonparametric data. Statistical significance will be determined using an alpha of p <0.05. All analyses will be examined using SPSS software (version x).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

New patients to the Respiratory Nursing Service in 2006, 2011, 2013 & 2015 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • any new client or new referral to the Respiratory Nursing Service in the years 2006, 2011, 2013 or 2015 only
  • have a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Exclusion Criteria

  • not a pre- existing client of the Respiratory Nursing Service
  • not having a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
2006 Patients
Comparison of Respiratory Chronic Disease Management provided against recommendations in 2005 Respiratory Nursing Guidelines through documentation
2011 Patients
Comparison of Respiratory Chronic Disease Management provided against recommendations in 2005 Respiratory Nursing Guidelines through documentation. With comparison of data against 2006 results.
2013 Patients
Comparison of Respiratory Chronic Disease Management provided against recommendations in 2005 Respiratory Nursing Guidelines through documentation. With comparison of data against 2006 & 2011 results.
2015 Patients
Group added to reflect recency of practice. Comparison of Respiratory Chronic Disease Management provided against recommendations in 2005 Respiratory Nursing Guidelines through documentation. With comparison of data against 2006 & 2011 results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of care provided by the Respiratory Nursing Service
Time Frame: 12 months
Compare documentation against the components of 'Nursing Best Practice Guideline, Nursing Care of Dyspnea: The 6th Vital Sign in Individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)'
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of respiratory nursing outreach on hospital, patient and service outcomes
Time Frame: 12 months
Hospital utilisation is determined by hospital admissions, emergency department presentations, length of stay, readmission within 28 days, number of Respiratory Outpatient reviews and use of Hospital at Home. Patient outcomes are frequency of exacerbations, disease severity and progression (FEV1: GOLD Classification), Quality of Life, lung function and exercise tolerance. Respiratory Nurse outcomes are the number and type of contacts performed
12 months
Comorbidity in respiratory nursing
Time Frame: 12 months
Identify the percentage of patients involved in the Respiratory Nursing Service with COPD who do and do not have a co-morbidity? Identify those with a comorbidity are they Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, of Cultural and Linguistic descent or of a low socioeconomic group? Identify the impact of co-morbid conditions using Charlson Comorbidity index isolating diabetes, heart failure, anxiety and depression?
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Brian J Smith, PhD, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Available upon request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data analysis is expected to be completed by 30 June 2018

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

For publication in nursing journal Sharing of information captured as requested

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

3
Subscribe