Effects of Herbst Appliance Therapy to Improve Airway Dimension

May 3, 2018 updated by: The University of Hong Kong
Herbst appliance is one of the most popular fixed functional appliances to treat orthodontic patients with small lower jaws. Since small lower jaws are reported to be one of the main reasons to induce sleep disordered breathing(SDB) of children, Herbst appliance can be used to treat SDB children. Previously no study compared the effects of Herbst appliance therapy with removable functional appliance on airway dimension, so it still remains unclear which kinds of functional appliance is more suitable for improving airway dimension. This study will assess the effect of Herbst appliance on airway dimension and compare the effects with those of twin block appliance (a popular 24 hours used removable functional appliance, and also commonly used to treat adult sleep apnea).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is an important paediatric problem. It is estimated that 3.2% to 12.1% of children have habitual snoring and 0.7% to 10.3% have obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Children OSAS is associated with a series of daytime and nighttime signs and symptoms. Nighttime symptoms include heavy snoring, restless sleep, heavy seating and enuresis, etc. Daytime symptoms include excessive daytime sleepiness and abnormal behavior such as aggressiveness and hyperactivity, etc. Untreated OSAS was reported to result in serious morbidity, such as failure to thrive, poor learning, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, etc.

There is an increasing concern related to sleep disordered breathing(SDB) of children by orthodontists. Since not only the tonsilar and adenoid hypertrophy is the main cause of paediatric OSA, but also craniofacial anomalies such as retrognathic mandible, narrow maxillary palatal arch and increased lower facial height can also contribute to it, orthopedic treatment such as rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and mandibular advancement device (MAD) may potentially permanently cure the children OSA. RME which is used to widen maxilla, thus increasing the nasal cavity and improving the nasal flow, has been thoroughly researched. However, only a few previous studies focused on the treatment effect of MAD for treating OSA children. These studies showed sorts of MAD such as jaw-positioning appliance, mono-block, and Herbst appliance were effective to OSA children, but it remains unclear how to choose a functional appliance, and if there is any treatment difference between removable functional appliance and fixed functional appliance for improving airway dimension.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 00852
        • Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Class II malocclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cleft lip and palate
  2. Craniofacial syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: The Herbst appliance
Orthodontic functional appliance
Orthodontic functional appliance
Active Comparator: Twin block appliance
Orthodontic functional appliance
Orthodontic functional appliance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The cephalometric measurement of dimensional change of upper way following 2-phase orthodontic treatment
Time Frame: 3 years two-phase treatment with functional appliance and fixed appliance
The two-phase treatment effects of Herbst and twin-block appliances on the upper airway are to be compared based on the lateral cephalometric analysis at three time points (T0: pre-treatment; T1: following 1 year functional appliance treatment; T3: following 2 years fixed appliance treatment). The parameters of lateral cephalometric analysis include the measurements of the depth of pharynx, the size of soft palate and the position of the hyoid bone.
3 years two-phase treatment with functional appliance and fixed appliance

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The three-dimensional change of upper way following 2-phase orthodontic treatment in magnetic resonance images
Time Frame: 3 years two-phase treatment with functional appliance and fixed appliance
The two-phase treatment effects of Herbst and twin-block appliances on the upper airway are to be compared based on the analyses of magnetic resonance images at three time points (T0: pre-treatment; T1: following 1 year functional appliance treatment; T3: following 2 years fixed appliance treatment).The analyses include measurements of the depth and width of pharynx, the size of soft palate and the tongue.
3 years two-phase treatment with functional appliance and fixed appliance

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yanqi Yang, The Paediatric dentistry and orthodontic department, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HKCTR-1858

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Angle Class II

Clinical Trials on The Herbst appliance

Subscribe