Effect of Skeletally Anchored Herbst Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Due to Mandibular Retrusion

May 13, 2020 updated by: Khaled ELHabbak

Three-dimensional Evaluation of Pharyngeal Airway Measurements Following Class 2 Correction With Skeletally Anchored Herbst Appliance

Ten adolescent female patients with Class 2 mandibular deficiency with a mean age of 16.5 ±1.71 years treated with type IV Herbst appliance.

Skeletally anchored appliance was connected directly to the mandible by a bilateral reconstruction bone plates to provide a skeletal anchorage, while connected to the maxilla through dental splint connecting upper canine, first premolar, first and second molars through the use of orthodontic bands connected together palatally by a heavy 1mm stainless steel wire.

The treatment duration was 9 months, then the appliances were removed,The Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans were taken before and immediately after Herbst treatment to analyse airway volume, also 3D measurement of the effective mandibular length has been taken. Cephalometric film was extracted from CBCT scans and analysed for dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The Herbst appliance was anchored by two reconstruction plates located bilaterally in the mandible between the canine and first premolar, while attached to the maxilla through dental splints utilizing orthodontic bands.

For each patient, two reconstruction plates were sent to the laboratory for LASER welding of the Herbst bases to the first hole of each reconstruction plate. This assembly was projected transmucosal and exposed into the oral cavity for direct connection with the Herbst appliance.

3D model for the mandible of each patient was printed with 3D printer machine after extracted from the patient CBCT.

The reconstruction plates were bended using a 3-jaw contouring and bending plier to be adapted to the printed model on the predetermined location between mandibular canine and 1st premolar bilaterally.Sterilization of the reconstruction plates were then preformed.

For surgical placement of reconstruction plates, An envelope flap with one releasing incision (three-corner flap)was made starting with the horizontal incision 3-mm apical to the gingival crest from the mesial surface of lower second premolar to the distal surface of lower lateral incisor on one side, then a vertical incision was made at the mesial end of the horizontal incision, extending apically to the chin level to allow unstrained placement of the reconstruction plate. The same procedures were performed on the other side.

Reconstruction plates were checked for proper positioning before fixation, the reconstruction plate was held in place, a small hole, only through the cortex of bone, was made by a surgical round bur through the middle hole of the reconstruction plate. This was followed by complete drilling using a surgical screw drill , a 2.3mm screw was used to fix the reconstruction plate in its place using the corresponding screwdriver .

Consequently, drilling of the upper and lower holes and fixation of screws were performed in the same manner, the same steps were performed to fix the contralateral reconstruction plate in its place.

The flaps were repositioned and sutured with 3/0 silk suture. Proper size readymade bands were selected for the maxillary first premolars, first and second molars, while canine bands were custom made specifically for each patient,The bands were accurately fitted in their place and an alginate impression for upper jaw was taken, washed and disinfected, then the bands were reinserted into the alginate impression and the impression was poured in white orthodontic stone. Then the cast was sent to the laboratory for constructing the palatal connecting wire and laser-welding the bands to the palatal wires. At this time, the bases of the telescopic mechanism were welded to the buccal surface of maxillary 1st molar bands.

In most patients, the mandible was advanced to an incisal edge-to-edge position in one step advancement, however, in two patients, because of the large overjet, the edge to edge position seemed to be traumatic, therefore two steps advancement about 5 mm each was undertaken using suitable spacers.

After adjustment and try in of all assembly, the maxillary splint was then cemented using glass ionomer cement .

The coupling heads of telescopic rods and tubes were secured inside the appliance bases on reconstruction plate and maxillary 1st molar bands respectively with the C-clip using plier.

Patients were recalled one day following appliance insertion then every two weeks.

The appliances were removed after nine months, the remnants of the glass ionomer cement were eliminated using finishing bur and teeth were polished using fluoride pumice powder with a rubber polishing cup in a low-speed hand piece. The reconstruction plates were removed with a second surgery.

Completion of orthodontic treatment for each patient was performed with fixed appliance to reach firm and functioning stable occlusion.

The images were acquired using CBCT machine. A scout view was obtained, and adjustments were made to ensure that all patients were correctly aligned in the scanner according to adjustment light beam before acquisition.

After acquisition, data were exported and transferred in digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) format and downloaded via a CD to a personal computer for Airway volume calculation and extraction of both panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiograph using a specific software.

Serial steps were followed by the same investigator to standardize the measurements in all scans. An identification number was assigned to each CBCT image prior to measurement in order to mask the patient's name and the time point during CBCT analysis. The CBCT images were re-matched to the patient's name after data collection were completed.

The CBCT scans were taken before and immediately after Herbst treatment to analyze the following….

  • 3D volumetric air way analysis.
  • 3D measurement of the effective mandibular length.
  • Cephalometric analysis after extraction from the CBCT. To ensure accurate and repeatable measures of all patients, all CBCT scans had to be oriented by the software before taking the measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al- Azhar University, Cairo-boys.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 20 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Skeletal and dental Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion (SNB≤ 76° )
  • Overjet ≥ 5.0 mm
  • Normal or low FMA angle (≤ 28)
  • Complete permanent dentition, excluding the third molars
  • Minimum or no crowding in the mandibular arch
  • All the patient involved in the study will be in stages 5 and 6 based on the modified cervical vertebral maturation stages (CVMS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any medical problems that may interfere with orthodontic treatment
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Clinical signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders.
  • Mandibular asymmetries.
  • Bad oral hygiene.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: skeletal class 2 malocclusion
10 patients treated with type IV Herbst appliance. The appliance was connected directly to the mandible by a bilateral reconstruction bone plates to provide a skeletal anchorage and avoid any mandibular teeth involvement
Herbst appliance could be considered as an artificial joint working between maxilla and mandible. The appliance consists of a bilateral telescope mechanism attached to upper and lower jaws keeping the mandible in an anterior jumped position.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
three dimensional evaluation of pharyngeal airway volume
Time Frame: 9 months

The air way analysis option was chosen to start the measurement. The nasopharynx, velopharynx, glossopharyngeal and the total air way horizontal boundaries all had been set parallel to Frankfort horizontal The vertical anterior boundary of pharyngeal airway was represented by the line perpendicular to FH plane and tangent to PNS.

A quick method for determining the airway sensitivity has been chosen using a threshold value of 70 unit which was find optimum for airway segmentation.

Consequently, the software was automatically converted the segmented airway into 3D volume.

The 3D air way volume for the nasopharynx, velopharynx and glossopharyngeal as well as the total pharyngeal airway were calculated and tabulated.

9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
dento-skeletal changes
Time Frame: 9 months
A constructed lateral cephalometric image was constructed from the patient's CBCT for assessment of maxillary and mandibular bony changes as well as the upper and lower anterior teeth.
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: khaled El-Habbak, Alazhar universty

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 25, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 2, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 25, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 107

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion, Angle Class II

Clinical Trials on Herbst fixed functional appliance

3
Subscribe