Semilunar Coronally Positioned Flap With or Without Enamel Matrix Derivative for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions

October 6, 2015 updated by: Enilson Antonio Sallum, University of Campinas, Brazil

Semilunar Coronally Positioned Flap With or Without Enamel Matrix Derivative for the Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recessions: Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study will be evaluate clinically the use of the Semilunar Coronally Positioned Flap (SCPF) for the treatment of gingival recessions, with or without Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD). Thirty patients will be assigned in two groups. Half of patients will receive EMD associated to SCPF, while the other half, will receive SCPF alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study will be evaluate clinically the use of the Semilunar Coronally Positioned Flap (SCPF) for the treatment of gingival recessions, with or without Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD). Thirty patients will be selected, randomized and allocated in two groups: test group (SCPF + EMD) and control group (SCPF). The subjects will should present buccal Miller class I gingival recessions with height greater than or equal to 2.0 mm and less than to 4.0 mm in maxillary canines or premolars. Clinical parameters will be evaluated: gingival recession height (GRH), gingival recession width(GRW), clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), height (HKT) and thickness (TKT) of keratinized tissue and papillas height (HP) and width(LP), as well as plaque and gingival index. These data will be collected at baseline and 180 days after surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil, 13414-903
        • Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Presence of at least one Miller Class I gingival recession ≥ 2 mm or ≤ 4mm in maxillary canines or premolars with identifiable cementum-enamel junction (CEJ);
  • Height of keratinized tissue ≥ 2 mm;
  • Aesthetic complaint and/or presence of dentin hypersensitivity to air stimulus;
  • Full-mouth visible plaque index ≤ 20% (Ainamo & Bay 1975);
  • Full-mouth sulcus bleeding index ≤ 20% (Mühlemann & Son 1971).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Presence of systemic disorders (diabetes, hypertension, heart disease or any other condition that could contraindicate periodontal surgery);
  • Use of medications (immunosuppressants, phenytoin or anything else that might affect mucosal healing and repair);
  • Previous periodontal surgery in the area.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SCPF + EMD (TEST)
Semilunar coronally positioned flap with Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain)
Semilunar coronally positioned flap with enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) or alone.
Enamel matrix derivative associated to semilunar coronally positioned flap (SCPF + EMD - test group)
Active Comparator: SCPF (CONTROL)
Semilunar coronally positioned flap alone
Semilunar coronally positioned flap with enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) or alone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Recession Reduction as measured by difference between gingival recession depth
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Measured as a difference between gingival recession depth at baseline and gingival recession at 6 months follow-up.
Baseline, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete root coverage
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessed as percentage of sites with complete root coverage
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 8, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 038/2012
  • 2013/13098-9 (Other Grant/Funding Number: FAPESP)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on Semilunar coronally positioned flap

3
Subscribe