Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Flap vs. Flapless Approach to Grafting

December 6, 2016 updated by: Henry Greenwell, University of Louisville
Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Flap vs. Flapless Approach to Grafting

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Thirty patients will be treated using the principles of guided bone regeneration and ridge preservation. Fifteen test patients will receive the flapless technique with an intrasocket cancellous cortical particulate allograft plus a facial overlay graft using a bovine xenograft plus Alloderm GBR. The positive control group of fifteen patients will receive the flap technique with an intrasocket cancellous cortical particulate allograft plus a facial overlay graft using a bovine xenograft plus Alloderm GBR. Approximately, four months post-surgery, a trephine core will be taken from the grafted site immediately prior to implant placement and submitted for histologic processing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Have one non-molar tooth requiring extraction that will be replaced by a dental implant. The site must be bordered by at least one tooth.
  2. Healthy male or female who is at least 18 years old.
  3. Patients must sign an informed consent approved by the University of Louisville Human Studies Committee.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with debilitating systemic diseases, or diseases that have a clinically significant effect on the periodontium.
  2. Presence or history of osteonecrosis of jaws.
  3. Patients who are currently taking IV bisphosphonates or who had IV treatment with bisphosphonates irrespective of duration.
  4. Patients who have been treated with oral bisphosphonates for more than three years.
  5. Patients with an allergy to any material or medication used in the study.
  6. Previous head and neck radiation therapy.
  7. Chemotherapy in the previous 12 months.
  8. Pregnant patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ridge preservation Flap
The flap procedure will consist of a full-thickness papilla preservation flap performed on the buccal and a full thickness flap on the palatal.
Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Flap vs. Flapless Approach to Grafting
Experimental: Ridge preservation Flapless
The test will be a flapless technique with tunneling and an intramucosal vertical incision on the buccal.
Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Flap vs. Flapless Approach to Grafting

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in post-extraction site to 4 month change in crestal osseous width
Time Frame: 4 months
Changes in post-extraction to 4 month change in ridge measurements at the mid-defect alveolar crest and 5 mm apical taken with a caliper.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Soft tissue thickness
Time Frame: 4 months
Soft tissue thickness measurements taken with a #40 endodontic reamer.
4 months
Percent osseous tissue
Time Frame: 4 months
A trephine core will be harvested at 4 months. Following histologic processing the osseous core will be classified into percent vital bone, nonvital bone and trabecular space.
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Jaw, Edentulous, Partially

Clinical Trials on Ridge Preservation

3
Subscribe