Combined Tactile and Proprioception Training After Spinal Cord Injury

May 8, 2017 updated by: Dr. Cheryl Glazebrook, University of Manitoba

Phase 1 Effects of Training With a Novel Rehabilitation Bike on the Functional Recovery and Corticospinal Plasticity in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries

A novel rehabilitation bike has been developed for patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries that incorporates mechanical stimulators on the bike pedals to stimulate the sensory receptors in the soles of the feet; the effect of mechanical stimulator on muscle strengthening has been reported by NASA to improve muscle atrophy in astronauts in zero-gravity environments. Cycling also stimulates lower limb position sensors. We predict that the combination of mechanical stimulation with cycling may be similar enough to walking over ground to lead to gains in balance and mobility. The present study will evaluate the therapeutic effect of this bike on balance, walking, as well as cortical-spinal and spinal pathways in patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION:

Individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) experience balance impairments and limitations in walking. Newer research demonstrates that even after several years individuals with incomplete SCIs can make significant gains in function when they are engaged in targeted physical activity. Previous studies using functional electrical stimulation and locomotion training report reduced spasticity and reflex control, increased electromyography activity during stepping, and increased thigh muscles mass. However, these methods and instruments are bulky, expensive, need technical maintenance, and must be used in a clinical setting. A novel rehabilitation bicycle that uses simultaneous stimulation of plantar mechanoreceptors and hip joint proprioceptors was developed in the department of Biomedical Engineering of University of Manitoba. An advantage of this device is that patients can use it at home and with minimal assistance. Five patients completed initial pilot testing and exhibited an overall improvement on the Berg Balance Scale. Presently, the effect of rehabilitation bike training on the plasticity of the spinal and corticospinal neuronal circuitry and consequently its effects on the functional walking capacity are unclear.

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of the rehabilitation bike on corticospinal and spinal plasticity, and functional walking and balance in incomplete SCI individuals.

METHODS:

Ten individuals with chronic incomplete SCI will participate in this study. The protocol will include 30 minute training sessions, three times/week, for 8 weeks. The study design will be a before-after clinical trial with two baseline assessments prior to training. Post-training evaluation after two weeks will be done and there will be a post-training follow-up assessment after two weeks.

Evaluations of functional recovery and independence include: Six -Minute and Ten-Meter Walk Tests, Walking index for spinal cord injury(WISCI II). The Berg Balance Scale(BBS) will be conducted to assess balance. Results will be compared before and after training. H-reflex and motor evoked potential (using transcranial magnetic stimulation ,TMS) will also be measured before and after cycling training to assess the plasticity at the level of the spine and in the corticospinal pathways respectively.

ANTICIPATED RESULTS:

Compared to locomotion training with treadmills and robotic devices, using the rehabilitation bike is affordable and patients are able to use it independently at home, without the help of a physical therapist or a caregiver. Results of this study will clarify the possible positive effect of training with the rehabilitation bike on the corticospinal reorganization as well as training effects on the functional recovery of balance and walking. If the findings from the present study are consistent with the initial pilot data, then it will provide incomplete SCI patients and their therapists with a new option for rehabilitation that is feasible and cost-effective. Considering the relatively high incidence of SCI in Manitoba, the findings from this study will directly improve quality of life for Manitobans and Canadians living with spinal cord injuries.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
        • Rehab/Resp Hospital (Health Sciences Center)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participant should have experienced a traumatic spinal cord injury
  • American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) class C or D
  • Between 18 and 65 years
  • At least 12 months post- injury to ensure stability of the patient's neurological condition
  • Should be able to walk 10 meters or more with or without assistance (use of braces or walking aids or parallel bars or moderate assistance of one person)
  • Should have range of motion in the lower limb joint sufficient to allow the cycling exercise
  • Discharged from all rehabilitation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Impaired mental capacity
  • Any medical contradiction to cycling training
  • Degenerative spinal disorder
  • Significant diagnosed osteoporosis
  • Excessive spasticity in the legs as measured by a score of more than 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale or any spasticity that limits the possibility of cycling exercise or walking
  • Obstructive and/or restrictive pulmonary disease
  • Severe spinal and Lower Limb deformities
  • Decubitus ulcer in the area in contact with the bike and bike's bed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cycling and Mechanical stimulation
Cycling and Mechanical stimulation : 30 minute cycling training, 3 times a week for 8 weeks.
Cycling and Mechanical stimulation : 30 minute cycling training, 3 times a week for 8 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Peak-to-peak amplitude of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs)
Time Frame: 2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
MEPs in tibialis anterior muscle using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation will be measure.The average of 4 trials in different stimulation intensity will be calculated.
2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
Change in Peak-to-peak amplitude of the H-reflex
Time Frame: 2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
Average of 10 peak to peak amplitudes of the H-reflex in soleus muscle with stimulation frequencies of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 10 Hz.
2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Berg Balance Scale score(BBS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
BBS is a 14-item scale to assess balance.Total Score is 56 points.
2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
Change in 10 meter walk test time
Time Frame: 2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
Duration of walking for 10 meters.
2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
Change in 2 minute walk test score
Time Frame: 2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
The distance walked within 6 minutes.
2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
Change in Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II) score
Time Frame: 2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session
WISCI II is an index; it scores the ability of an individual to walk after SCI after a 10 meters of walking. The index score range is 0-20 from the level of most severe impairment (0) to least severe impairment (20) based on the use of devices, braces and physical assistance of one or more persons
2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training, 2 weeks after the last training session

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale score
Time Frame: 2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training
Modified Ashworth Scale measures muscle tone, or spasticity ( bilateral major hip and knee muscle groups will be assessed clinically in this study).The scores range from 0-4.
2 weeks prior to first baseline measurement, prior to first training session, after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chery Glazebrook, University of Manitoba

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Cycling and Mechanical stimulation

3
Subscribe