- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02554656
Vfend Special Investigation For Pediatric - Observational
March 19, 2021 updated by: Pfizer
VFEND SPECIAL INVESTIGATION- INVESTIGATION FOR TREATMENT OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS -
Examine the safety and effectiveness of Vfend [voriconazole] for pediatric under general clinical practices.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
89
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Osaka, Japan
- XXXXXXX
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 second to 15 years (CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
The subjects who have been treated with voriconazole for severe mycosis
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who is under 15 years old and deep mycosis infection.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have been previously enrolled in this study. -
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions
Time Frame: 16 weeks at maximum
|
An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to VFEND in a participant who received VFEND.
A serious ADR was an ADR resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Relatedness to VFEND was assessed by the physician.
|
16 weeks at maximum
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions Not Expected From the LPD (Unknown Adverse Drug Reaction)
Time Frame: 16 weeks at maximum
|
An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to VFEND in a participant who received VFEND.
Expectedness of the adverse event was determined according to the Japanese package insert.
Relatedness to VFEND was assessed by the physician.
|
16 weeks at maximum
|
|
Incidence of Aadverse Reactions by Diagnosis (Infection)
Time Frame: 16 weeks at maximum
|
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to VFEND in a participant who received VFEND.
Relatedness to VFEND was assessed by the physician.
Participants with ADRs were counted by diagnosis (infection) to assess whether it was a risk factor for the occurrence of ADRs.
|
16 weeks at maximum
|
|
Overall Clinical Response
Time Frame: 16 weeks at maximum
|
Clinical effectiveness rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI.
Overall clinical effectiveness of VFEND was assessed as "effective", "not effective", or "indeterminate" by the physician based on the clinical course at the end of the observation period or at the time of treatment discontinuation.
|
16 weeks at maximum
|
|
Clinical Response Rate by Diagnostic Name (Name of Infection)
Time Frame: 16 weeks at maximum
|
Clinical effectiveness rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI.
Overall clinical effectiveness of VFEND was assessed as "effective", "not effective", or "indeterminate" by the physician based on the clinical course at the end of the observation period or at the time of treatment discontinuation.
Overall effectiveness of VFEND was determined by the physician based on the clinical course.
Participants achieved clinical effectiveness by Diagnosis (Infection) were counted to assess whether it contributes to the clinical effectiveness.
|
16 weeks at maximum
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
October 27, 2015
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
September 25, 2018
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
September 25, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 17, 2015
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
September 18, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
April 14, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 19, 2021
Last Verified
March 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- A1501100
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g.
protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions.
Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pediatric Safety and Effectiveness
-
University of British ColumbiaCompleted
-
The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen HospitalTianjin Happy Life Technology Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingFeasibility | Safety | Targeted Molecular Therapy | Effectiveness
-
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingAdverse Effect | Safety and Effectiveness | Feasibility StudyChina
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalNot yet recruitingSafety | Effectiveness | Ringer Bicarbonate | Elderly Abdominal Surgery
-
The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityCompletedClinical Trial | Comparative Effectiveness Research | Equipment SafetyChina
-
Biotronik, Inc.TerminatedSafety and Effectiveness of the Siello S LeadUnited States
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanRecruitingSafety and Effectiveness | Health Adults | Temporal Interference Stimulation | Crossover StudyTaiwan
-
JointMedica Inc.Not yet recruitingHealthy | Safety and Effectiveness | Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) | Real World DataUnited Kingdom
-
JointMedica Inc.Not yet recruitingHealthy | Safety and Effectiveness | Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) | Real World DataAustralia, Canada, New Zealand
-
The People's Hospital of GaozhouCompletedExploring the Effectiveness and Safety of Amino Acid Peritoneal Dialysis SolutionChina