Study of the Effect of Atorvastatin for Reducing Aging-related Complication in HIV-infected Patients Older Than 45 Years Receiving a Protease Inhibitor-based Regimen Versus a Raltegravir-based Regimen

Study of the Effect of Atorvastatin for Reducing "Inflaming" (Aging-related Complication) in HIV-infected Patients Older Than 45 Years Receiving a Protease Inhibitor-based Regimen Versus a Raltegravir-based Regimen

Physicians in charge of HIV-infected patients are increasingly being faced to previously unrecognized comorbid conditions such as atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events, loss of renal function, osteopenia/osteoporosis and bone fractures or non-AIDS-defining cancers (1-4). The incidence of these conditions seems to be higher than in the general population but there are controversial data about if these diseases appear at a younger age in HIV-infected patients.

The investigators propose a strategy for treatment of elderly HIV-infected patients with a double impact on systemic inflammation and age-related co-morbidities by switching the protease inhibitors by raltegravir, a integrase inhibitor with a neutral effect on lipid and bone metabolism, and adding an statin because of their anti-inflammatory effect. For safety reasons, only patients with maintained viral suppression (documented indetectable viral load for 1 year or more), and no history of virological failure to integrase inhibitors or suspected or documented resistance mutations to the integrase or retrotranscriptase will be candidates for the study.

Interleukin -6 and D-dimer are biomarkers that most strongly predict mortality in treated HIV infection and sCD14, sCD163 are soluble markers of monocyte activation that reflect a key source of inflammation and coagulation in HIV infection and predict mortality (26,27). For that reasons, these markers were chosen to determine changes on them after the introduction of the statin and the change of antiretrovirals

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Physicians in charge of HIV-infected patients are increasingly being faced to previously unrecognized comorbid conditions such as atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events, loss of renal function, osteopenia/osteoporosis and bone fractures or non-AIDS-defining cancers (1-4).

The incidence of these conditions seems to be higher than in the general population but there are controversial data about if these diseases appear at a younger age in HIV-infected patients.

Different pathogenic mechanisms are involved in the increased risk of comorbidities. First, the increased life expectancy of the HIV-infected population. The number of elderly HIV+ individuals is dramatically increasing, and nowadays, approximately one-half of the people living with HIV in the United States are age 50 or older (5). In this sense, aging itself is a condition associated with a chronic inflammation and immune senescence, contributing to accelerate age-related morbidity. Second, the persistent inflammatory state and activation of the immune system also induced by the HIV-infection, per se. This condition amplifies the risk of age-related morbidity (6-9). Finally, antiretroviral-related toxicities contribute to accelerate the apparition of some of these diseases such as the dyslipidemia and cardiovascular events (mainly associated with the protease inhibitors use), renal damage or low bone mineral density (especially by tenofovir and probably also by protease inhibitors).

As a consequence, one of the current aims of HIV management is the management of chronic non-infectious co-morbidities in an increasingly older and more complex population. The use of the newest and more safety antiretroviral drugs is a mandatory strategy, especially in this elderly population, to achieve a maintained viral suppression. However, there are many published studies showing higher levels of inflammation even in patients under a viral suppression, in comparison with general population. Regarding this condition, the investigators currently lack effective interventions to potently block this inflammatory status. Although some initial data are published about this regard, data in elderly HIV-infected people are lacking.

Based on these data, the investigators propose a strategy for treatment of elderly HIV-infected patients with a double impact on systemic inflammation and age-related co-morbidities by switching the protease inhibitors by raltegravir, a integrase inhibitor with a neutral effect on lipid and bone metabolism, and adding an statin because of their anti-inflammatory effect. For safety reasons, only patients with maintained viral suppression (documented indetectable viral load for 1 year or more), and no history of virological failure to integrase inhibitors or suspected or documented resistance mutations to the integrase or retrotranscription will be candidates for the study.

Raltegravir is an antiretroviral drug that received approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2007. It was the first of a new class of HIV drugs, the integrase inhibitors, and exhibited rapid, potent and durable antiretroviral activity in antiretroviral naïve patients and in treatment-experienced patients with drug-resistant HIV-1 (10-12). Raltegravir has demonstrated a neutral effect on lipid and renal parameters, and a better impact on bone mineral density (13) and lipid profile than protease inhibitors (14).

Statins are lipid-lowering drugs that also exert anti-inflammatory effects, and have immune-modulatory properties. Recent studies in HIV-infected population have suggested that statins have an anti-inflammatory effect, evaluated by inflammatory markers (15-21), and that the statin use is associated with a lower risk of non-AIDS defining morbidities and malignancies and mortality (22-25). But limited data have been published, mainly based on retrospective studies, and no clinical recommendations are available. The investigators propose the use of atorvastatin to study the anti-inflammatory effect measuring changes in inflammatory markers and some clinical conditions. Atorvastatin was chosen due to the low drug-drug interactions of this statin and ritonavir and the low cost. Since very few data are available about the effect of statins on inflammatory markers and clinical conditions, a intermediate dose (20 mg per day) was selected.

IL-6 and D-dimer are biomarkers that most strongly predict mortality in treated HIV infection and sCD14, sCD163 are soluble markers of monocyte activation that reflect a key source of inflammation and coagulation in HIV infection and predict mortality (26,27). For that reasons, these markers were chosen to determine changes on them after the introduction of the statin and the change of antiretrovirals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, 08916
        • Germans Trias I Pujol Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient having a diagnosis of HIV-1 infection.
  • Age 45 years old.
  • Current highly active antiretroviral therapy including Truvada or Kivexa plus a ritonavir boosted PI started at least 3 months before.
  • Maintained undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA (VL < 50 copies/mL) for at least 12 months.
  • Voluntary written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of virological failure to integrase inhibitors.
  • Suspected or documented resistance mutations to the integrase, as well as NRTI-related mutations that may impact nucleoside activity in current regimen.
  • Systemic concurrent process such as coinfection with hepatitis C or B, acute systemic infection within the last 4 months, neoplasm, chronic inflammatory process, etc.
  • Treatment with other drugs with anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant or antiplatelet effect (for instance corticosteroids, aspirin, etc…)
  • Therapy with statins within the last 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Raltegravir + Atorvastatin
Switching the PI by raltegravir, plus Kivexa or Truvada, for 24 weeks. After that, atorvastatin, 20mg/day, will be added for 48 weeks
Switching the PI by raltegravir 400mg every 12 hours, plus Kivexa or Truvada, for 24 weeks.
Atorvastatin, 20mg/day, will be added after 24 weeks of study for 48 weeks
Active Comparator: PI-based regimen + Atorvastatin
Continue with the same PI-based regimen, plus Kivexa or Truvada, for 24 weeks. After that, atorvastatin, 20mg/day, will be added for 48 weeks.
Atorvastatin, 20mg/day, will be added after 24 weeks of study for 48 weeks
Continue with the same PI-based regimen, plus Kivexa or Truvada, for 24 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the Inflammatory Marker IL-6
Time Frame: baseline, wk24 and wk72
Switching the PI by raltegravir, plus Kivexa or Truvada for 24 weeks. After that, atorvastatin, 20mg/day has been added for 48 weeks. (intergroup and intragroup)
baseline, wk24 and wk72
Changes in Plasma Soluble Markers (D-dimer)
Time Frame: baseline, wk24 and wk72
Changes in plasma soluble markers (D-dimer)
baseline, wk24 and wk72

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the Inflammatory, Immune and Coagulation
Time Frame: at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Changes in the inflammatory, immune and coagulation (intergroup and intragroup )
at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in the Inflammatory, Immune and Coagulation
Time Frame: at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in the inflammatory, immune and coagulation
at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in the Inflammatory, Immune and Coagulation
Time Frame: at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in the inflammatory, immune and coagulation
at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Lipid Profile
Time Frame: at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in lipid profile
at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Lipid Profile
Time Frame: at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in lipid profile
at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Lipid Profile
Time Frame: at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in lipid profile
at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Lumbar and Femoral BMD and T-score Measured by DEXA
Time Frame: at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in lumbar and femoral BMD and t-score measured by DEXA
at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Lumbar and Femoral BMD and T-score Measured by DEXA
Time Frame: at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in lumbar and femoral BMD and t-score measured by DEXA
at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Lumbar and Femoral BMD and T-score Measured by DEXA
Time Frame: at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in lumbar and femoral BMD and t-score measured by DEXA
at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Bone Turnover Markers
Time Frame: at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in bone turnover markers
at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Bone Turnover Markers
Time Frame: at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in bone turnover markers
at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Bone Turnover Markers
Time Frame: at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in bone turnover markers
at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Renal Parameters
Time Frame: at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in renal parameters
at week 72 from week 24 to assess the effect of statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Renal Parameters
Time Frame: at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in renal parameters
at week 72 from baseline to assess the effect of PI or raltegravir plus statin
Compare Intergroup and Intragroup Changes in Renal Parameters
Time Frame: at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Compare intergroup and intragroup changes in renal parameters
at week 24 from baseline to asses the effect of PI or raltegravir
Viral Load < 50 Copies
Time Frame: at week 72
viral load < 50 copies
at week 72
Viral Load > 50 Copies
Time Frame: through study completion
viral load > 50 copies
through study completion
CD4+/CD8+ T Lymphocytes
Time Frame: at week 72 from baseline
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes
at week 72 from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 4, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 4, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging-related Inflammation in HIV-infected Patients

Clinical Trials on Raltegravir

3
Subscribe