Effect of Local Steroid Application on a Cervical Plate Versus Intravenous Steroids on Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)

May 29, 2019 updated by: Alpesh A. Patel, Northwestern University

A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Local Steroid Application on a Cervical Plate Versus Intravenous Steroids on Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)

Local application of steroids in ACDF surgery will lead to decreased incidence of dysphagia compared to intravenous steroids or a control group

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Dysphagia is a common complication after ACDF. PSTS is also a natural sequela of ACDF and can lead to airway compromise among other complications. Previous studies have demonstrated that administration of intravenous methylprednisolone (1mg/kg) after anterior cervical spine surgery reduced the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal lesions as identified by nasofibroscopic examination. Lee et al. prospectively evaluated 50 patients and determined that local application of steroids in the retropharyngeal area following ACDF reduced PSTS and odynophagia as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) compared to a control group. Furthermore, there were no adverse events/reactions from local application of steroid on a gel foam sponge in the setting of anterior spinal surgery. There are no studies in the current literature that investigate the incidence of dysphagia with application of local steroids after ACDF, nor are there any studies that stratify the efficacy of local steroids compared to intravenous steroids. There is also no current spine literature that directly compares the efficacy of intravenous steroids versus local steroids in the incidence of dysphagia or dysphonia. Our study will be the first in the literature to assess the efficacy of local steroids in reducing the incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery, and as a result, may improve patient outcomes after ACDF.

Dysphagia and dysphonia are common complications after anterior cervical spine surgery. Despite their clinical importance, studies on the treatment and/or prevention of these complications are limited due to the lack of valid and reliable outcome measures. The majority of research is found in the otolaryngology literature and has focused on disease pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapy.

The Bazaz score has been used in the spine literature to evaluate dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). This is a subjective questionnaire that has not been validated in the literature. Additionally, new patient-centered outcome measures, the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) have recently been developed, and in addition to the Bazaz score, have been shown to have excellent validity and reliability in the ENT patient population. These instruments can be used to document the initial dysphagia or dysphonia severity and monitor the treatment response in people with a wide array of swallowing and voice disorders.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Medicine Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing ACDF (single or multi-level) for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
  • All subjects must have given signed, informed consent prior to registration on study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing revision surgery, any operations for trauma, infection, tumor
  • Patients with general metabolic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, chronic heart and renal diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
No steroid
Experimental: IV steroid
10 mg of intraoperative intravenous decadron with gel foam sponge placed on cervical plate
10 mg of intraoperative intravenous decadron with gel foam sponge placed on cervical plate
Experimental: Local steroid
40 mg of triamcinolone on gel foam sponge dabbed on the anterior cervical plate
40 mg of triamcinolone on gel foam sponge dabbed on the anterior cervical plate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op
Time Frame: baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year.
Outcome measure used to measure the incidence and severity of postoperative trouble swallowing. Summative score of 10 questions (range 0-40) with each question scored 0-4 with higher scores indicating greater severity/frequency of difficulty or disability reported by the patient for the indicated activity; EAT-10 >3 = dysphagia & EAT-10 >15 = severe dysphagia
baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year.
Percentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op
Time Frame: baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year.
Outcome measure used to measure the incidence and severity of postoperative trouble with hoarseness of voice; summative score of 10 questions (range 0-40) with each question scored 0-4 with higher scores indicating greater severity/frequency of disability or handicap reported by the patient. Reported as a percentage of patients in each group reporting an 'abnormal' VHI-10 score defined as a summative score >11
baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year.
Neck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op
Time Frame: Obtained at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year
Outcome measure used to measure for neck pain that includes personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Summative scores for 10 questions (range 0-50) with each question scored 0-5 where higher scores for each question indicates greater extent of disability/difficulty for the associated activity. Reported as a mean percentage + standard deviation of difficulty/disability experienced by the patient.
Obtained at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year
Median Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op
Time Frame: Obtained at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year; analyzed for all time points through 6 months post op
Most commonly utilized pain scale; scored 0-10 with higher values indicating increased severity of pain experienced by the patient
Obtained at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year; analyzed for all time points through 6 months post op
Percentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score
Time Frame: Evaluated at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year
Outcome measure used to measure the incidence and severity of postoperative trouble swallowing
Evaluated at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Spine

Clinical Trials on Decadron

3
Subscribe