Neurological Consequences of Perinatal Listeriosis Infection (MONALISABABY)

March 31, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Multicentric Observational National Analysis of Listeriosis and Listeria : Evaluation of the Neurological Consequences of Perinatal Listeriosis Infection

The purpose of the study is to determine whether perinatal listeriosis is associated with long-term neurological consequences, and to evaluate the respective contribution of perinatal sepsis, of prematurity and of the known neurological tropism of the involved pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Perinatal listeriosis is defined by the occurrence of maternal listeriosis at birth and/or of early-onset listeriosis in the neonate (defined by the positive culture of any sample of maternal or neonatal origin).

Neurological involvement is defined by the presence of inflammation of the cerebrospinal fluid of positive culture or the cerebro-spinal fluid.

Evaluation is performed at the age of 5 years, and includes WPPSI evaluation of the Intelligence Quotient (IQ), NEPSY evaluation of the executive functions and clinical evaluation checking for any motor, sensorial or other focal deficiency among 90 cases and 270 controls matched for gestational age.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children from the MONALISA cohort (culture proven-maternal listeriosis)
  • Or Children from the EPIPAGE cohort (control group)
  • Written consent from the parent(s) or legal representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children whose parents or legal representative would deny their consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MONALISA 5-years old children
Clinical and neuropsychological evaluation procedure 90 children
WPPSI, NEPSY, Brief, SDQ, Vineland and SCQ evaluation Clinical examination
Active Comparator: EPIPAGE 5 -years old children
Cohort of prematurely borne children and their controls Clinical and neuropsychological evaluation procedure 270 children
WPPSI, NEPSY, Brief, SDQ, Vineland and SCQ evaluation Clinical examination

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction of > 20 points of the Intellectual Quotient
Time Frame: Day 1
Evaluated by standard tests (WPPSI-IV)
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score obtained at M-ABC evaluation test (Movement-ABC)
Time Frame: Day 1
to evaluate alteration of executive functions
Day 1
Score obtained at SDQ evaluation test (Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Day 1
to evaluate alteration of cognitive functions
Day 1
Score obtained at SCQ evaluation test (Social Communication Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Day 1
to evaluate alteration of cognitive functions
Day 1
Score obtained at BRIEF-P evaluation test (Behavior Rating Inventoring Executive Function)
Time Frame: Day 1
to evaluate alteration of executive functions
Day 1
Score obtained at HOME evaluation test (Home Observation and Measurement of Environment)
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Score obtained at Vineland Scale
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Scores obtained at NEPSY-2 evaluation tests
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Caroline CHARLIER-WOERTHER, MD, PhD, Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur, IHU Imagine - Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP / Centre National de Référence Listeria, Centre collaborateur OMS Listeria, Institut Pasteur
  • Study Chair: Marc LECUIT, MD, PhD, Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur, IHU Imagine - Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP /Centre National de Référence Listeria, Centre collaborateur OMS Listeria, institut Pasteur

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 26, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perinatal Listeriosis

Clinical Trials on Clinical and neuropsychological evaluation procedure

3
Subscribe