Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of DRG Stimulation for Discogenic Low Back Pain

January 16, 2017 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

A Prospective Post Market Observational Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of DRG Stimulation in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain

The purpose of this prospective post market observational pilot study is to evaluate the effect of DRG stimulation in the management of chronic discogenic pain in subjects who are refractory to other available treatments. Selected subjects will not be suitable candidates for lumbar spinal surgery and will meet the standard selection process for DRG stimulation as routinely utilised in the study centre. Results from this pilot study will inform current clinical practice and future comparative studies in this specific population.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arnhem
      • Velp, Arnhem, Netherlands, 6883 AZ Velp
        • Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Velp

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients of either gender with chronic (minimum 6 month duration), refractory low back pain believed to be primarily originating from the intervertebral disc

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject of either gender between 18 and 65 years of age
  2. Subject is able and willing to comply with the follow-up schedule and protocol
  3. Subject is able to provide written informed consent
  4. Chronic low back pain of at least 6 months
  5. History consistent with discogenic low back pain (e.g. Pain produced on lumbar motion, significant functional limitation in sitting duration and tolerance)
  6. Neurologic exam without marked motor deficit.
  7. Definite/Highly Probable/Discogenic Pain as confirmed by provocative discography according to IASP/ISIS guidelines*
  8. Low Back Pain intensity should be 6 or higher measured on a NPRS at baseline
  9. Meets all the inclusion criteria for the implantation of a neurostimulation system as typically utilised in the study centre
  10. Subject has been screened by a multi-disciplinary panel including a psychologist and deemed suitable for implantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Female subject of childbearing potential is pregnant/nursing or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
  2. Escalating or changing pain condition within the past month as evidenced by investigator examination
  3. BMI ≥35
  4. Subject has had injection therapy or radiofrequency treatment for their low back pain within the past 3 months
  5. Subject currently has an active implantable device including ICD, pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug pump
  6. Subject is unable to operate the device
  7. Severe disc degeneration at the affected level as evidenced by >50% disc height loss on plain anteroposterior and lateral lumbar radiographs or CT/MRI.
  8. Extruded or sequestered herniated nucleus pulposus at the affected level(s).
  9. Previous lumbar back surgery (e.g. Laminectomy, discectomy or fusion) at the affected level(s)
  10. Moderate to severe spinal stenosis due to osteophyte and/or ligamentous overgrowth as evidenced by MRI or CT in the previous 6 months
  11. Moderate to severe endplate degenerative changes at the affected levels
  12. Grade 1-2 spondylolisthesis
  13. Previous Neurostimulation therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Relief
Time Frame: Change in pain intensity at 6 and 12 months post implantation of the stimulation device as compared to baseline scores
To determine the number (percentage) of subjects who achieve a sustained and clinically meaningful reduction in the intensity of LBP of ≥30% or 2 points on a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) in the implanted subjects at 6 and 12 month follow up visits as compared to baseline.
Change in pain intensity at 6 and 12 months post implantation of the stimulation device as compared to baseline scores

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 28-SMI-2015

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Discogenic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation

Subscribe