Analgesia Effects of Nalbuphine vs Sulfentanil

November 11, 2015 updated by: Sun Shen, Fudan University

Analgesia Effects of Nalbuphine vs Sulfentanil in Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section

Cesarean section may result in great trauma and postoperative pain. Besides incision pain, uterine contraction pain is another source of postoperative pain after cesarean section. In clinical practice, a large amount of uterine contraction agent is routinely applied after cesarean section so as to promote involution of uterus and reduce postoperative hemorrhage, which also causes great uterine contraction pain. Acute pain is the risk factor of chronic pain, and may postpone the recovery from labour and influence the quality of life of parturient. Though various analgesia modules have been attempted, more than 20% parturients still experience severe postoperative pain, and pain management after cesarean section remains a challenge to anesthesiologists.

This study aim to compare the effects of nalbuphine hydrochloride vs sufentanil citrate on patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after cesarean section.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cesarean section may result in great trauma and postoperative pain. Besides incision pain, uterine contraction pain is another source of postoperative pain after cesarean section. In clinical practice, a large amount of uterine contraction agent is routinely applied after cesarean section so as to promote involution of uterus and reduce postoperative hemorrhage, which also causes great uterine contraction pain. Acute pain is the risk factor of chronic pain, and may postpone the recovery from labour and influence the quality of life of parturient. Though various analgesia modules have been attempted, more than 20% parturients still experience severe postoperative pain, and pain management after cesarean section remains a challenge to anesthesiologists.

Opiate drugs constitute the baseline medication for postoperative analgesia. However, pure μ opioid receptor agonist like morphine and fentanyl may induce adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness and respiratory depression. Nalbuphine hydrochloride is an opiate-like substance structure-related oxymorphone, which is a κ receptor agonist/μ receptor partial antagonistic type analgesia drug. Specific κ receptor agonist and gene knockout experiment reveals that κ receptor agonist depresses the visceral pain induced by chemical stimulation, the effect of which outperforms pure μ opioid receptor agonist. Studies have discovered that some κ receptor agonists can reduce or inhibit the side effects of μ receptor agonist such as tolerance or dependence. The adverse effects of μ receptor agonist such as pruritus, nausea, vomiting, delayed gastric emptying are caused by the drug on peripheral opioid receptor, and can be relieved by opioid receptor agonist. The structure of nalbuphine hydrochloride is related to naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, therefore, the incidence of adverse effects of nalbuphine hydrochloride is lower than that of μ receptor agonist. In recent years, nalbuphine hydrochloride has become more and more popular in postoperative analgesia. There has been reports on intrathecal administration of nalbuphine hydrochloride for analgesia after cesarean section, while the effect of intravenous administration of nalbuphine hydrochloride on analgesia after cesarean section remains undetermined. This study aim to compare the effects of nalbuphine hydrochloride vs sufentanil citrate on patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after cesarean section.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For primipara with selective cesarean section

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe preeclampsia,
  • pregnancy complicated with diabetes mellitus
  • pregnancy complicated with cardiac disease,
  • gestation age<37W
  • recently use of opiate drugs or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs within 48 h before operation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nalbuphine
Nalbuphine group: nalbuphine 100 mg, ramosetron 0.3mg, background dose 1ml/h,patient-controlled analgesia(PCA) 1ml/time, lockout time 10 min, flurbiprofen axetil 50mg 6h after operation.
patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Other Names:
  • nalbuphine 100 mg
patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Other Names:
  • flurbiprofen axetil 50mg
patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Other Names:
  • ramosetron 0.3mg
Experimental: Sufentanil
Sufentanil group: sufentanil 100ug, ramosetron 0.3mg, background dose 1ml/h, PCA 1ml/time, lockout time 10 min, flurbiprofen axetil 50mg 6h after operation.
patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Other Names:
  • flurbiprofen axetil 50mg
patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Other Names:
  • ramosetron 0.3mg
patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Other Names:
  • sufentanil 100ug

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain scores of nalbuphine group
Time Frame: up to 24 months
up to 24 months
Pain scores of sufentanil group
Time Frame: up to 24 months
up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Usage of nalbuphine of nalbuphine group
Time Frame: up to 24 months
up to 24 months
Usage of sufentanil of sufentanil group
Time Frame: up to 24 months
up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2015

Last Verified

October 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on C.Delivery; Surgery (Previous), Gynecological

Clinical Trials on Nalbuphine

Subscribe