Effect of a Continuous Infusion of Esmolol on Stroke Volume in Patients With Hyperdynamic Vasoplegic Septic Shock (BétaSep)

Effect of a Continuous Infusion of Esmolol on Stroke Volume in Patients With Hyperdynamic Vasoplegic Septic Shock: a Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind Trial

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the administration of a short acting beta-blocker in terms of effective increase in stroke volume (at least 15%) after 4 hours initiation of therapy in septic shock in patients with a hyperkinetic profile after 12-24 hours of care.

This research seeks to demonstrate that the proportion of patients with an increase in the systolic ejection superior or equal to 15% (relative to baseline) at four hours is different between the two arms of the study: (1) an experimental arm where patients receive an esmolol infusion according to a predetermined procedure and (2) a control arm where patients receive a saline infusion according to a predetermined procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives are to compare the following items between the two arms of the study:

A. Central venous oxygen saturation at 4 hours (H4)

B. Changes in plasma concentration of lactates between H0 and H4

C. Changes in the tissue oxygen saturation between H0 and H4

D. Changes in echocardiographic parameters of systolic function of the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV), as well as diastolic LV function between H0 and H4

E. Vascular Filling volume during the study period

F. Kidney function: urine output and creatinine changes between H0 and H4

G. The required vasopressor time between H0 and H4

H. Use of positive inotropic agents

I. The inflammatory response via the analysis of HLA-DR between H0 and H4 and M1 / M2 responses at H4

J. The duration of ICU stay, mortality, morbidity in terms of organ failures

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille Cedex 20, France, 13915
        • APHM - Hopital Nord
      • Nîmes Cedex 09, France, 30029
        • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient or his/her representative was informed about the implementation of the study, its objectives, constraints and patient rights or emergency consent
  • The patient or his/her representative must haven given free and informed consent and signed the consent or emergency consent
  • The patient must be affiliated with or the recipient of a health insurance plan
  • Septic shock criteria: shock for which the suspected or proven starting point is an infection requiring vasopressors after adequate fluid resuscitation that started within the past 24 to 72 hours
  • Precharge independence criteria obtained: i.e. pulsed pressure variation <13% or variation in ejection volume <10% or variation in the cardiac index after passive lift leg <10% or central venous pressure between 8 and 12 mmHg.
  • Antibiotic treatment in progress
  • Prescription ongoing vasopressor for 24 to 72 hours.
  • Sinus rhythm
  • Heart rate > 100 beats per minute
  • Cardiac Index measured by thermodilution greater than 4.0 l / min / m^2
  • Central venous oxygen saturation > 80% without positive inotropics such as dobutamine or isoproterenol (continuously taken or measured via central venous line in superior vena cava territory) on two successive samples in 12 hours
  • Monitoring of stroke volume (invasive, semi-invasive or ultrasound)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is participating in another study
  • The patient has participated in another study in the last 3 months
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under any kind of guardianship
  • The patient is under judicial protection
  • The patient or his/her representative refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
  • The patient has a contraindication for a treatment used in this study
  • Cardiac index < 4.0 l / min / m^2
  • Need to introduce a positive inotropic agent (as determined by the physician in charge of the patient)
  • Contraindications to the use of esmolol: Severe sinus bradycardia (less than 50 beats per minute); Sinus pathologies, severe disorders of atrioventricular conduction (without pacemaker), atrioventricular blocks of second and third degree; Cardiogenic shock; Severe hypotension; Decompensated heart failure; Untreated pheochromocytoma; Pulmonary hypertension; Acute asthma attack; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; peripheral arterial disease; Metabolic acidosis; Known hypersensitivity to esmolol.
  • Patient with kidney failure (RIFLE Stage L)
  • Chronic treatment with beta blocker
  • Patient with ultrasound assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Continuous perfusion of esmolol
Intervention: Drug: Continuous perfusion of esmolol
In the experimental arm of the study, a continuous perfusion of esmolol will be performed. This infusion starts at 5 ml / h with an increase of 5 ml / hr every 10 minutes to obtain a 15% decrease in heart rate. The infusion will be reduced by 5 ml / h every 5 minutes if the cardiac rate is less than 90 beats per minute and stopped if it is less than 70 beats per minute. At H4, the doctor in charge is free to gradually continue or stop the infusion.
Placebo Comparator: Continuous perfusion of saline
Intervention: Continuous perfusion of saline
In the control arm of the study, a continuous infusion of normal saline will be performed. This infusion starts at 5 ml / h with an increase of 5 ml / hr every 10 minutes to obtain a 15% decrease in heart rate. The infusion will be reduced by 5 ml / h every 5 minutes if the cardiac rate is less than 90 beats per minute and stopped if it is less than 70 beats per minute. A H4, the doctor in charge is free to gradually continue or stop the infusion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Is stroke volume increased ≥ 15% as compared to baseline?
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The time spent with a central venous oxygen saturation between 70% and 80% (minutes)
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Evolution of blood lactate between H0 and H4
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Changes in tissue oxygen saturation compared to baseline
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Ejection fraction of the left ventricle drops below 40% between H0 and H4? yes/no
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
the change (in %) of the systolic S wave on the tissue doppler at the mitral annulus relative to baseline
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Change (%) in the sub aortic time-speed integral relative to baseline
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Absolute values of the E wave
Time Frame: baseline (hour 0)
baseline (hour 0)
Absolute values of the E wave
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Absolute values of the E' wave
Time Frame: baseline (hour 0)
baseline (hour 0)
Absolute values of the E' wave
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Absolute value of the ratio E/A on pulsed Doppler at the mitral annulus
Time Frame: baseline (hour 0)
baseline (hour 0)
Absolute value of the ratio E/A on pulsed Doppler at the mitral annulus
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Absolute Value of the ratio E/E ' one tissue Doppler at the mitral annulus
Time Frame: baseline (hour 0)
baseline (hour 0)
Absolute Value of the ratio E/E ' one tissue Doppler at the mitral annulus
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Right ventricular systolic function
Time Frame: baseline (hour 0)
baseline (hour 0)
Right ventricular systolic function
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
right ventricle / left ventricle diameter ratio
Time Frame: baseline (hour 0)
baseline (hour 0)
right ventricle / left ventricle diameter ratio
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Vascular filling volume (ml)
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Diuresis (ml/kg/h)
Time Frame: collected between hours 0 and 4
collected between hours 0 and 4
Change in creatinine relative to baseline (µmol/L)
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Required duration of vasopressors (min)
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Use of positive ionotropic agents? yes/no
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Percentage variation o, inflammatory cytokines (tissue necrosis factor) with respect to baseline values
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Percentage variation o, inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 1) with respect to baseline values
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Percentage variation o, inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 10) with respect to baseline values
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Percentage change in the expression of the human leukocyte antigen-DR gene with respect to baseline
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Length of stay in the intensive care unit (days)
Time Frame: Expected maximum of 28 days
The maximum observed length of stay in the intensive care unit (days) = Dmax
Expected maximum of 28 days
Number of days free of organ failure
Time Frame: Dmax +1 (Dmax has an expected maximum of 28 days)
Dmax +1 (Dmax has an expected maximum of 28 days)
Mortality
Time Frame: Dmax +1 (Dmax has an expected maximum of 28 days)
Dmax +1 (Dmax has an expected maximum of 28 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marc Leone, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock, Septic

Clinical Trials on Continuous perfusion of esmolol

Subscribe