Back School or Brain School for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Lumbar Radiculopathy? (B²asic)

June 8, 2021 updated by: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Back School or Brain School for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Lumbar Radiculopathy? A Randomized Controlled Trial With Two-year Follow-up

The primary scientific objective of the study entails examining whether perioperative pain neuroscience education (PPNE or 'brain school') is more effective than classical back school in reducing pain and improving pain inhibition in patients undergoing surgery for spinal radiculopathy. A secondary objective implies examining whether PPNE is more effective than classical back school in imparting a behavioural change (i.e. decreasing postoperative healthcare expenditure for lumbar radiculopathy), improving functioning in daily life and improving surgical experience (=better prepared for surgery, surgery meeting their expectations) in patients undergoing surgery for spinal radiculopathy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Prior to this study on lumbar radiculopathy patients, the proposed CPM protocol with EEG recordings will be pre-tested on a group of twenty healthy subjects, who will be fully informed about the study and subsequently gave their consent to participate. The proof of concept is set up to evaluate the effectiveness of the protocol, more specifically the appearance of nociceptive evoked potentials induced by electrical stimulation and the load on the subjects, as well as the safety of the protocol.

Low back pain is a frequently reported problem in our community. In the absence of successful outcomes following conservative intervention, surgery (including lumbar discectomy) is a recommended, evidence-based treatment for lumbar radiculopathy. To prevent chronicity following spinal surgery, preoperative education seems to be warranted. Current preoperative education programs in the orthopaedic and neurosurgical domain typically rely on the biomedical model, including education about (spinal) anatomy and biomechanics (like done in 'back schools'), as well as detailing the surgical procedure. Preoperative education focussing on the biomedical model is ineffective, and can increase anxiety and fear of patients undergoing spinal surgery. Therefore, there is a need to reconsider the content of education provided to patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Patient recruitment. All patients scheduled for surgery for lumbar radiculopathy in the UZ Brussel will be invited to participate. Lumbar radiculopathy is defined as pain due to lumbosacral nerve root compression. The NICE guidelines describe this as unilateral leg pain worse than the current back pain. This pain radiates to the foot or toes, and goes together with numbness and paraesthesia in the same distribution, which is associated with motor neurological deficit. Patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy (n ≥ 100), willing to participate (including willingness to comply with the predetermined follow-ups), are recruited.

Randomization and concealment Randomization will be done by a computer-generated randomization list. A list with patient numbers and the group allocation that results from this randomization procedure will be stored in a sealed envelope. All the assessments will be performed by the same two investigators.

Intervention. At least 50 patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy should get the experimental treatment, i.e. perioperative pain neuroscience education (PPNE). All patients will receive usual care plus surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. PPNE will comprise of two treatment sessions delivered by one physiotherapist (verbal one-on-one) and an educational booklet. The first treatment session will be in the week before surgery, the second on day 2 following surgery. Each treatment session will last approximately 60 minutes.

Patients will receive pain neuroscience education and will have extensive possibilities to ask questions during the sessions. At the end of the first educational session, patients will receive the educational booklet about the neurophysiology of pain and will be asked to read it carefully once before and once following surgery. In addition, they will be asked to complete the interactive part in the book before the second session. The second educational session (postoperative) is highly individually-tailored as it will readdress the patient's illness perceptions, answers questions and discuss the way of applying the knowledge into the patient's daily life. Immediately after the second educational session the participants will be asked to complete the Neurophysiology of Pain Test.

Control intervention. At least 50 patients should undergo the control treatment. As is the case with patients from the experimental group, patients in the control group will receive usual care plus surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. In addition to this standard treatment received by all patients included in the study, they will receive back school. The amount of therapist-patient contact, the number of treatment sessions as well as the mode of administration will be identical in both treatment groups. The procedure of the control treatment is identical to the experimental treatment, apart from the content of the treatment, which is based on the clinical guidelines and several studies. The education covers the normal course of back pain.

Data collection. All assessments will be performed in the UZ Brussel. Baseline assessments will take place during the week prior to the surgery. Immediate treatment effects will be assessed at post-operative day 3. Short-term and intermediate follow-up assessments will take place at, respectively, 6 weeks and 6 months post-surgery. Twelve and 24 months after the surgery the long-term follow-up treatment effects will be investigated.

Statistical analysis. At baseline, correlation analyses will be performed in order to examine possible associations between preoperative endogenous analgesia and the psychological factors.

All postoperative data analyses will be based on the Intention-to-Treat principle (i.e. the baseline observation carried forward method). AN(C)OVA repeated measures analyses will be used to evaluate and compare treatment effects. Baseline data of the outcome measure of interest, age and gender will serve as covariates. Statistical, as well as clinical significant differences will be defined and the effect size will be determined. In addition, numbers needed to treat will be calculated. Again, correlation analyses will be performed to evaluate whether changes in any of the outcome measures are related to changes in the psychological factors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antwerpen
      • Duffel, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2570
        • Sint-Maarten
      • Geel, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2440
        • AZ Sint-Dimpna
    • Brussel
      • Jette, Brussel, Belgium, 1090
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery for radiculopathy
  • Speaking and reading Dutch fluently
  • 18-65 years old
  • Continuing usual care ( no new treatment) 6 weeks preceding surgery and during trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery for another condition than radiculopathy
  • Symptoms of cord compression
  • Rheumatoid, endocrinological, neurological or psychiatric disorder
  • Chronic illness characterized by chronic pain that is not under control
  • New treatments 6 weeks preceding surgery
  • Pregnancy (preceding year)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Brain School
Pain Neuroscience Education Program
2 sessions of education provided by a therapist. The first session one day before surgery, the other two days after surgery. Education contains physiology of the central nerve system and the pain system. Information about acute pain, chronic pain and central sensitisation.
Other Names:
  • pain education, perioperative pain neuroscience education
Active Comparator: Back School
Classical Back School
Two education sessions ( one day before surgery and two days after surgery) with information about the biomechanics of the lumbar spine, physiology of the spine and ergonomics.
Other Names:
  • classical back school

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Change between baseline(1 week before surgery) and 3 days post-surgery, baseline and 6weeks post-surgery, baseline to 6 months post-surgery, baseline to 12 months post-surgery and baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Patients fill in the Visual Analogue Scale ( 0 no pain - 10 unbearable pain) for their perceived back and leg pain.
Change between baseline(1 week before surgery) and 3 days post-surgery, baseline and 6weeks post-surgery, baseline to 6 months post-surgery, baseline to 12 months post-surgery and baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Electrical pain threshold measured with an constant current electrical stimulator (DS7A Digitimer)
Time Frame: Change between baseline(1 week before surgery) and 3 days post-surgery, baseline and 6weeks post-surgery, baseline to 6 months post-surgery, baseline to 12 months post-surgery and baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Determination of the electrical pain threshold with an electrical stimulator at the Median Nerve and Sural Nerves of each patient.
Change between baseline(1 week before surgery) and 3 days post-surgery, baseline and 6weeks post-surgery, baseline to 6 months post-surgery, baseline to 12 months post-surgery and baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Endogenous pain inhibition assessed by the conditioned pain modulation paradigm
Time Frame: Change between baseline(1 week before surgery) and 3 days post-surgery, baseline and 6weeks post-surgery, baseline to 6 months post-surgery, baseline to 12 months post-surgery and baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Conditioned pain modulation will be tested with the electrical stimulator as test stimulus and the cold pressor (12 °C) as conditioning stimulus. The difference between the electrical pain threshold (baseline) and the electrical pain threshold during the cold pressor (baseline + cold pressor) is called the conditioned pain modulation effect.
Change between baseline(1 week before surgery) and 3 days post-surgery, baseline and 6weeks post-surgery, baseline to 6 months post-surgery, baseline to 12 months post-surgery and baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) for brain mapping
Time Frame: Change between baseline(1 week before surgery) and 3 days post-surgery, baseline and 6weeks post-surgery, baseline to 6 months post-surgery, baseline to 12 months post-surgery and baseline to 24 months post-surgery
During the conditioned pain modulation a QEEG is administered to examine the differences in brain activation on the brain map between the time frames.
Change between baseline(1 week before surgery) and 3 days post-surgery, baseline and 6weeks post-surgery, baseline to 6 months post-surgery, baseline to 12 months post-surgery and baseline to 24 months post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative healthcare expenditure for lumbar radiculopathy will be investigated by consultation of medical notes.
Time Frame: The difference between 3 days post-surgery, 6weeks post-surgery, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Postoperative healthcare expenditure includes the number of days spent in hospital following surgery and medical tests related to post-operative surgery.
The difference between 3 days post-surgery, 6weeks post-surgery, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Functional status and well-being with the Short Form Health Survey-36 items
Time Frame: 1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Surgical experience assessed with statements about patients their spinal surgery/education experience with a level of agreement on a numerical scale from 1 "minimal" to 10 "maximal agreement".
Time Frame: The difference between 3 days post-surgery, 6weeks post-surgery, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Surgical experience addresses the way the patient feels to be prepared for surgery, and the extent the surgery met patient's expectations.
The difference between 3 days post-surgery, 6weeks post-surgery, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Pain catastrophizing with the Dutch translation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: 1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
The pain catastrophizing scale consists of 13 items describing different thoughts and feelings that individuals may experience when they are experiencing pain.
1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Pain hypervigilance with the Dutch Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
The Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire is a 16-item measure of attention to pain that assesses awareness, consciousness, vigilance, and observation of pain.
1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Kinesiophobia with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: 1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Socio-economic factors with a demographic questionnaire concerning their return to work, professional occupation, incomes and grade of education.
Time Frame: 1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Patients will be asked to fulfil a demographic questionnaire concerning their grade of education, professional occupation, incomes and return to work.
1 week before surgery (except for surgical experience), 3 days after surgery, 6weeks post operative, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Self-reported healthcare expenditure for which diaries will be used.
Time Frame: The difference between 3 days post-surgery, 6weeks post-surgery, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Self-reported healthcare expenditure includes the number of postsurgical treatments (e.g. pain killers, physiotherapy, psychotherapy, osteopathy).
The difference between 3 days post-surgery, 6weeks post-surgery, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 23, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Radiculopathy

Clinical Trials on Brain school

3
Subscribe