My Body is Fit and Fabulous at School Phase II

November 4, 2019 updated by: University of Malaya

My Body is Fit and Fabulous: an Intervention Program to Combat Obesity Among Malaysian School Children

"My Body is Fit and Fabulous" (MyBFF@school) program was designed specifically for overweight and obese school children in order to help them control their BMI and body fat. MyBFF@school is a multi-faceted obesity intervention program that incorporated physical activity, nutrition and psychology modules.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

"My Body is Fit and Fabulous" (MyBFF@school) is a school-based, cluster randomised controlled trial (C-RCT) study that primarily aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MyBFF@school program on overweight and obese school childrens' BMI for age (BMI z-score) and body fat percentage at 3 and 6 months post intervention. Primary and secondary schools in the central region of Peninsular Malaysia were randomised to either intervention or control school via systematic random sampling method. The selected intervention schools underwent MyBFF@school programme that consisted of physical activity, nutrition and psychology modules, whereas the control schools followed the standard national school curriculum.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2438

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Give consent
  • Overweight and obese students with BMI for age (BMI z-score) more than +1SD based on WHO 2007 Growth Reference
  • Age between 9-16 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI for age below and equal +1SD
  • Physical or mental disability
  • Medical conditions that prevent him/her to participate in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
  • Co-morbidities that may interfere with the study such as:

    1. diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus
    2. hypertension
    3. nephritic syndrome
    4. epilepsy
    5. congenital heart disease
    6. skeletal anomalies
  • On steroids
  • On anti-epileptic
  • On methylphenidate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Age-matched overweight and obese students were selected from control schools. The students participated in their usual health and physical education classes plus any other curriculum activities provided by the school.
Experimental: Intervention
Overweight and obese students were recruited from intervention schools. Students underwent MyBFF@school intervention programme that consisted of physical activity, nutrition and psychological modules for the duration of 6 months. MyBFF@school intervention programme were conducted by trained personnel that were stationed full-time at each intervention school.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BMI z-score
Time Frame: Change from Baseline BMI z-score at 3 months and change from Baseline BMI z-score at 6 months
To see changes in BMI z-score. Also called as BMI standard deviation scores, which measures relative weight adjusted for child age and sex. Weight in kilograms and height in meters will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2. By using the value of BMI obtained, BMI z-score was calculated using World Health Organization (WHO) AnthroPlus 2007 software, with indication of overweight >+1.0 SD, obese >+2.0 SD and morbidly obese >+3.0 SD.
Change from Baseline BMI z-score at 3 months and change from Baseline BMI z-score at 6 months
Percentage of Body Fat (%)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Body Fat Percentage at 3 months and change from Baseline Body Fat Percentage at 6 months
To see changes in percentage of body fat. It is the percentage of body weight that is made up of fat. It consists of both storage body fat and essential body fat. It was measured in light clothing without shoes and socks to the nearest 0.1 kg using a pre-calibrated body impedance analyser (InBody 770, Korea)
Change from Baseline Body Fat Percentage at 3 months and change from Baseline Body Fat Percentage at 6 months
Waist Circumference (cm)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Waist Circumference at 3 months and change from Baseline Waist Circumference at 6 months
To see changes in Waist Circumference. Waist Circumference was measured twice to the nearest 0.1 cm over the skin midway between the tenth rib and the iliac crest at the end of normal expiration, using a non-extensible tape.
Change from Baseline Waist Circumference at 3 months and change from Baseline Waist Circumference at 6 months
Skeletal Muscle Mass (kg)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Skeletal Muscle Mass at 3 months and change from Baseline Skeletal Muscle Mass at 6 months
To see changes in Skeletal Muscle Mass. Skeletal Muscle Mass is the weight of muscles that connected to the bones in the body that were measured in light clothing without shoes and socks to the nearest 0.1 kg using a pre-calibrated body impedance analyser (InBody 770, Korea)
Change from Baseline Skeletal Muscle Mass at 3 months and change from Baseline Skeletal Muscle Mass at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HbA1c Level
Time Frame: Change from Baseline HbA1c Level at 6 months.
To see changes in HbA1c Level. HbA1c level was determined by cationic exchanged high performance liquid chromatography (Adams A1c HA-8160, Arkray Inc, Japan) and followed the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Programme Guidelines.
Change from Baseline HbA1c Level at 6 months.
Fasting Plasma Glucose
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose at 6 months.
To see changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose. Fasting Plasma Glucose was analysed by Randox Laboratories (Antrim, UK) using an auto chemical analyser (Dirui CS-400, China).
Change from Baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose at 6 months.
Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Total Cholesterol at 6 months.
To see changes in Total Cholesterol. Total Cholesterol was analysed by Randox Laboratories (Antrim, UK) using an auto chemical analyser (Dirui CS-400, China). The cut-off value for high Total Cholesterol is 5.20 mmol/L.
Change from Baseline Total Cholesterol at 6 months.
Triglycerides Level
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Triglycerides Level at 6 months.
To see changes in Triglycerides Level. Triglycerides Level was analysed by Randox Laboratories (Antrim, UK) using an auto chemical analyser (Dirui CS-400, China). The cut-off value for high Triglycerides Level is 1.70 mmol/L.
Change from Baseline Triglycerides Level at 6 months.
HDL-C Level
Time Frame: Change from Baseline HDL-C Level at 6 months.
To see changes in HDL-C Level. HDL-C Level was analysed by Randox Laboratories (Antrim, UK) using an auto chemical analyser (Dirui CS-400, China). The cut-off value for low HDL-C Level is 1.03 mmol/L.
Change from Baseline HDL-C Level at 6 months.
LDL-C Level
Time Frame: Change from Baseline LDL-C Level at 6 months.
To see changes in LDL-C Level. LDL-C Level was analysed by Randox Laboratories (Antrim, UK) using an auto chemical analyser (Dirui CS-400, China). The cut-off value for high LDL-C Level is 2.84 mmol/L.
Change from Baseline LDL-C Level at 6 months.
Fasting Insulin Level
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Fasting Insulin Level at 6 months.
To see changes in Fasting Insulin Level. Fasting Insulin levels were measured using an automated enzyme immunoassay analyser (TOSOH AIA-360, Japan).
Change from Baseline Fasting Insulin Level at 6 months.
HOMA-IR
Time Frame: Change from Baseline HOMA-IR at 6 months.
To see changes in HOMA-IR. HOMA-IR is calculated by multiplying the value of fasting insulin and fasting plasma glucose and divided by 22.5.
Change from Baseline HOMA-IR at 6 months.
TG:HDL-C Ratio
Time Frame: Change from Baseline TG:HDL-C Ratio at 6 months.
To see changes in TG:HDL-C Ratio. TG:HDL-C Ratio is calculated by dividing triglycerides levels with HDL-C levels.
Change from Baseline TG:HDL-C Ratio at 6 months.
Physical Fitness Score
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Physical Fitness Score at 3 months and change from Baseline Physical Fitness Score at 6 months
To see changes in Physical Fitness Score. Physical Fitness Score was assessed using Modified Harvard Step Test. Physical Fitness Score was calculated with this formula: (Total duration in seconds/Total pulse rate at 0, 1 and 2 minutes) X 100. After the calculation of the physical fitness score, the subjects' physical fitness were categorized into 5 different categories. The first category was poor, where the score of their physical fitness score is below 54. The second was low average, as their physical fitness score falls between the range of 55 to 64. Next, high average with the score between 65 to 79 followed by the fourth category which was good i.e. between the ranges of 80 to 89. Lastly, the fifth category was excellent, where the subjects' physical fitness score were more than 90.
Change from Baseline Physical Fitness Score at 3 months and change from Baseline Physical Fitness Score at 6 months
Nutrition Knowledge
Time Frame: Change in Nutrition Knowledge from Baseline to 6 months assessment
To assess their changes of Nutrition Knowledge using a pre-tested Nutrition Knowledge using a validated Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire. The school children completed a 10-item True/ False/ Don't know Nutrition Knowledge questionnaire before and after intervention. The correct answer was given a score of 1 whereas for the wrong answer and I don't know was given a score of 0. The total score for every respondent was calculated from the correct responses with a maximum of 10 points which were then converted to percentages. Total scores for the knowledge items were then ranked into 3 tertiles; lowest (≤50%), middle (60%) and highest (70-100%).
Change in Nutrition Knowledge from Baseline to 6 months assessment
Nutrition Attitude
Time Frame: Change in Nutrition Attitude from Baseline to 6 months assessment
To assess their changes of Nutrition Attitude using a pre-tested Nutrition Attitude Questionnaire. There were 15 questions for the attitude items. The attitude items were on a five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1 point) to strongly agree (5 points). An intermediate (neutral) option was allocated 3 points. Total scores for the attitude items were then ranked into 3 tertiles; lowest (≤50%), middle (60%) and highest (70-100%).
Change in Nutrition Attitude from Baseline to 6 months assessment
Nutrition Practice
Time Frame: Change in Nutrition Practice from Baseline to 6 months assessment
To assess their changes of Nutrition Practice using a pre-tested Nutrition Practice Questionnaire. Assessment focused mainly on the key components that should be and commonly practiced by the school children. These included intake of fruit and vegetable, plain water, carbonated drinks, breakfast intake a swell as food commonly brought food from home and also food commonly purchased from the school canteen.
Change in Nutrition Practice from Baseline to 6 months assessment
Stages of Change for Weight Management (Secondary School)
Time Frame: Change in behaviour of weight management from Baseline to 6 months assessment
To assess their behavioural changes via Stage of Change of Weight Management by using a validated Trans Theoretical Model Questionnaire for weight management behaviour.
Change in behaviour of weight management from Baseline to 6 months assessment
Stages of Change for Fruit and Vegetable Intake (Secondary School)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Stages of Change of Fruit and Vegetable Intake at 6 months
To assess their behavioural changes via Stage of Change of Fruit and Vegetable Intake by using a validated Trans Theoretical Model Questionnaire for fruit and vegetable intake behaviour.
Change from Baseline Stages of Change of Fruit and Vegetable Intake at 6 months
Health-Related Quality of Life (Primary School)
Time Frame: Change in behaviour of fruit and vegetable intake from Baseline to 6 months assessment
To assess their changes of Health-Related Quality of Life using KINDL-R questionnaire. It contains 24 Likert-scaled items that are associated with 6 subscales namely physical well-being, emotional well-being, self-esteem, friend, family and school functioning. Total scores are obtained by adding the scores of all subscales. Higher scores represent better outcome. Range score from 15 to 75
Change in behaviour of fruit and vegetable intake from Baseline to 6 months assessment
Well-Being (Primary School)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Well-Being at 6 months
To assess their changes of Well-Being using the Stirling Children Well-being Scale (SCWBS) questionnaire. It is comprised of two subscales which are positive outlook and positive emotional state. Total scores are obtained by adding the scores of all subscales. Higher scores represent better outcome. Range score from 24 to 120
Change from Baseline Well-Being at 6 months
Eating Attitude (Primary School)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Eating Attitude at 6 months
To assess their changes of Eating Attitude using the Children' Eating Attitude Test (ChEAT) questionnaire. It is comprised of three subscales namely dieting, restricting and purging, food and oral control . Higher scores represent worse outcome. Range score from 26 to 156
Change from Baseline Eating Attitude at 6 months
Emotional and Psychological Well-Being (Secondary School)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Emotional and Psychological Well-Being at 6 months
To assess their changes of Emotional and Psychological Well-Being using the Youth-Self Report questionnaire. YSR contains 112 items to measure emotional and behavioral problems comprising of 12 subscales which are anxious /depressed, withdrawn/depressed, somatic complaints, social problems, thought problems, attention problems, rule-breaking behaviour, aggressive behaviour, other problems, internalizing, externalizing and total behaviour. Internalizing are the total sum of the subscales of anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed and somatic complaints. Externalizing are the total sum of rule-breaking behaviour and aggressive behaviour. Total behavior are the sume of all subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcome. Range score from 0 to 224
Change from Baseline Emotional and Psychological Well-Being at 6 months
Eating Attitude (Secondary School)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Eating Attitude at 6 months
To assess their changes of Eating Attitude using the Eating Attitude Test (EAT-26) questionnaire. It is comprised of three subscales namely dieting, bulimia and food preoccupation and oral control. Higher scores represent worse outcome. Range score from 30 to 180
Change from Baseline Eating Attitude at 6 months
Healthy Eating Behavior (Secondary School)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Healthy Eating Behavior at 6 months
To assess their changes of Healthy Eating Behavior using the Adolescents Food Habits Checklist. Higher scores represent better outcome. Range score from 0 to 46
Change from Baseline Healthy Eating Behavior at 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Blood Pressure at 6 months.
To see changes in Blood Pressure. Blood Pressure reading was measured manually by trained staffs using a mercury sphygmomanometer (Accoson, UK) with appropriate cuff size for each individual.
Change from Baseline Blood Pressure at 6 months.
Baseline Pubertal Status
Time Frame: Baseline
Pubertal Status was assessed (self-administered) using Tanner staging scale.
Baseline
Pubertal Status Post-Intervention
Time Frame: At 6 months
Pubertal Status was assessed (self-administered) using Tanner staging scale.
At 6 months
Acanthosis Nigricans
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants were examined for the presence of acanthosis nigricans over the neck.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NMRR1343916563

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overweight, Childhood

Clinical Trials on MyBFF@school

3
Subscribe