- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02634684
Pharmacologically-augmented Cognitive Therapies (PACTs) for Schizophrenia.
Pharmacologic Augmentation of Neurocognition and Cognitive Training in Psychosis
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
MH59803 demonstrated that AMPH (20 mg p.o.) significantly increased PPI and neurocognitive performance (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; MCCB) in HS characterized by specific performance-based or genetic biomarkers, including the val/val genotype for the rs4680 polymorphism of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Mechanistically-informative results were detected in studies of AMPH effects on PPI in rats with high vs. low brain regional Comt expression. Together with several reports of improved neurocognition and no adverse effects of acute or sustained AMPH administration to antipsychotic (AP)-medicated SZ/SZA patients, MH59803 findings provide a strong rationale for the next goal of this application: to test the potential utility of AMPH in a paradigm of biomarker-informed "PACTs". This "next step" is highly innovative - never previously reported, or perhaps even attempted - and consistent with National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) objectives, directly challenges existing models for SZ/SZA therapeutics. Investigators will determine whether a test dose of 10 mg AMPH p.o. administered to biomarker-identified, AP-medicated SZ/SZA patients generates predicted increases in PPI, MCCB performance, and sensory discrimination learning in a Targeted Cognitive Training (TCT) module. In total, Investigators will leverage knowledge generated through converging cross-species studies in MH59803, to directly advance scientific and clinical domains, by testing the effects of a pro-cognitive drug on neurophysiological and neurocognitive performance, and Targeted Cognitive Training, in biomarker-stratified subgroups of SZ/SZA patients.
Aim: To assess acute effects of AMPH (0 vs 10 mg po) on PPI, neurocognition and computerized TCT in AP-medicated SZ/SZA patients. Hypothesis: PPI- and MCCB-enhancing effects of AMPH seen previously in HS will also be detected in SZ/SZA patients, as will TCT-enhancing effects of AMPH. Prediction: In a within-subject, placebo-controlled, randomized design, AMPH (10 mg po) will increase PPI and enhance MCCB and TCT performance in medicated SZ/SZA patients, particularly among those characterized by low basal performance levels and/or the val/val rs4680 COMT polymorphism. Concurrent HS testing will confirm and extend findings of AMPH effects on PPI and neurocognition, and help interpret findings in SZ/SZA patients.
In all participants, the aim to assess acute effects of 0 vs. 10 mg po dextroamphetamine (AMPH) on Prepulse Inhibition (PPI), neurocognition MATRICS: Consensus Cognitive Battery; MCCB, and computerized Targeted Cognitive Training (TCT).
Hypothesis: AMPH will enhance:
- PPI
- neurocognition (MCCB performance)
- computerized TCT performance in biomarker-identified SZ/SZA patients.
- The PPI and MCCB-enhancing effects of AMPH seen previously in HS will also be detected in SZ/SZA patients, as will TCT-enhancing effects of AMPH.
Prediction: In a within-subject, placebo-controlled, randomized design, AMPH (10 mg po) will increase PPI and enhance MCCB and TCT performance in medicated SZ/SZA patients, particularly among those characterized by low basal performance levels and/or the val/val rs4680 COMT polymorphism. Concurrent HS testing will confirm and extend findings of AMPH effects on PPI and neurocognition, and help interpret findings in SZ/SZA patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92103
- Clinical Teaching Facility (CTF-B102) at UCSD Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-55 years old:
- Drug Free (No recreational/street drugs)
- Diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder, Depressed Type
- Must be stable on antipsychotic medication for at least 1 month
- Any medications other than antipsychotic medications need to be stable for at least 1 week
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dominant hand injury
- Hearing impairment at 40 dB
- Irregular menstrual cycle or cycle is no within in 25-35 days (menopausal is eligible)
- EKG, conduction abnormalities confirmed by cardiologist
- Reading component of Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4) Score less than 70
- Any serious illness, including: Insulin-dependent diabetes, HIV, AIDS, cancer, stroke, heart attack, uncontrolled hypothyroidism
- Sleep apnea
- A diagnosis of epilepsy or history of seizures with loss of consciousness
- Open/closed head injury with loss of consciousness greater than 1 minute at any time in the lifetime
- Blood pressure: Systolic Blood Pressure < 90 or > 160, Diastolic Blood Pressure < 45 or > 95
- Heart Rate < 55 or > 110
- Current use of Dexatrim or drugs containing phenylephrine (eligible if not used for at least 72 hours prior to participation)
- Current use of St. John's Wort, Milk Thistle (eligible if for at least 1 month)
- Self report of any illicit drug use within the last 30 days
- Positive urine toxicology
- Self-report of any use of ecstasy, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), mushrooms, gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB), ketamine, phencyclidine (PCP), heroin or any intravenous-drugs within past year
- If there is a history of substance abuse/addiction, participant must be in remission for at least 6 months
- Within 1 month of recent psychiatric hospitalization
- Current mania
- Dementia/Alzheimer's diagnosis
- Mania episode meeting criteria outlined in the MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus 6.0 (M.I.N.I. plus 6.0) anytime in the lifetime (hypomania/Bipolar II eligible)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: dextroamphetamine
Drug: Dexedrine, dextroamphetamine, d-amphetamine. Dosage form, frequency and duration: Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) 30 minutes after arriving at the lab. The participant then completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory. The participant stays at the lab for 7.5 hours in order to monitor physical condition in case the participant received the active pill One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory. Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week. |
Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) and completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory.
One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory.
Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week.
Other Names:
Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) and completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory.
One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory.
Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Dexedrine, dextroamphetamine, d-amphetamine Dosage form, frequency and duration: Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) 30 minutes after arriving at the lab. The participant then completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory. The participant stays at the lab for 7.5 hours in order to monitor physical condition in case the participant received the active pill One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory. Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week. |
Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) and completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory.
One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory.
Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week.
Other Names:
Each participant receives a single pill of placebo or active drug (dextroamphetamine 10 mg) and completes approximately 6 hours of testing in the laboratory.
One week later, that participant receives a single pill of the alternate comparator and is again tested in the laboratory.
Thus, in total, each participant receives one placebo pill and one active pill, separated by one week.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Prepulse Inhibition (PPI)
Time Frame: two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours
|
PPI was assessed with 42 trials of 6 types: 118 dB 40 ms pulse alone (P) & the same P preceded 10, 20, 30, 60, or 120 ms by a prepulse (pp) 16 dB over background. Startle magnitude (SM), habituation, latency & latency facilitation were measured to interpret changes in PPI. %PPI = 100 x [(SM on P trials) - (SM on pp+P trials)] / SM on P trials. Example: SM on P trials = 80 units SM on pp+P trials = 30 units %PPI = 100 x (80-30)/80 = 100 x 50/80 = 62.5% Greater %PPI mean the reflex has been inhibited to a greater extent in the presence of a pp. %PPI can't exceed 100: when SM on pp+P trials = 0, then %PPI = 100 x (SM on P trials - 0)/SM on P trials = 100 x 1 = 100%. However, %PPI can theoretically be infinitely negative since SM on pp+P trials could be infinitely large ("prepulse facilitiation" (PPF)), i.e. SM is potentiated in the presence of a pp. PPF is "normal" at very short & very long pp intervals, but not within a species-specific physiological range of intervals. |
two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Performance (MCCB)
Time Frame: two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours
|
The T-score indicates the performance on a neurocognitive battery of tests.
Higher score reflects better performance.
|
two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours
|
|
Targeted Cognitive Training (TCT): PositScience, Inc.
Time Frame: two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours
|
Auditory discrimination learning: Subjects identify direction (up vs. down) of 2 consecutive sound sweeps.
Parameters (e.g.
inter-sweep interval, sweep duration) are established for subjects to maintain 80% correct responses.
On screen and test days, subjects complete 1h of TCT.
Analytic software yields the key measures: auditory processing speed (APS) and APS "learning".
APS is the shortest inter-stimulus interval at which a subject performs to criteria and APS learning is the difference (ms) between the first APS and the best APS of the subsequent trials.
A smaller APS reflects "better" discrimination (i.e., subject correctly identified frequency "sweep" direction despite a smaller ms gap between stimuli) and a larger ms value for APS learning reflects more learning, i.e., faster APS with repeated trials.
Limits for APS are capped at 0-to-1000 ms; values for APS learning are capped at (-) 1000-to-APS.
|
two visits, 1 week apart, each visit lasting approximately 6 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Neal R. Swerdlow, M.D., Ph.D., UC San Diego
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261.
- Nuechterlein KH, Green MF, Kern RS, Baade LE, Barch DM, Cohen JD, Essock S, Fenton WS, Frese FJ 3rd, Gold JM, Goldberg T, Heaton RK, Keefe RS, Kraemer H, Mesholam-Gately R, Seidman LJ, Stover E, Weinberger DR, Young AS, Zalcman S, Marder SR. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):203-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
- Vinogradov S, Fisher M, de Villers-Sidani E. Cognitive training for impaired neural systems in neuropsychiatric illness. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jan;37(1):43-76. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.251. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
- Green MF, Kern RS, Heaton RK. Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009.
- Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;153(3):321-30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.321.
- Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.
- Fisher M, Holland C, Merzenich MM, Vinogradov S. Using neuroplasticity-based auditory training to improve verbal memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;166(7):805-11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08050757. Epub 2009 May 15.
- Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Keefe RS, Davis SM, Davis CE, Lebowitz BD, Severe J, Hsiao JK; Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Investigators. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1209-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688. Epub 2005 Sep 19. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 9;363(11):1092-3.
- Ressler KJ, Rothbaum BO, Tannenbaum L, Anderson P, Graap K, Zimand E, Hodges L, Davis M. Cognitive enhancers as adjuncts to psychotherapy: use of D-cycloserine in phobic individuals to facilitate extinction of fear. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;61(11):1136-44. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.11.1136.
- Swerdlow NR. Beyond antipsychotics: pharmacologically-augmented cognitive therapies (PACTs) for schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jan;37(1):310-1. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.195. No abstract available.
- Barch DM, Carter CS. Amphetamine improves cognitive function in medicated individuals with schizophrenia and in healthy volunteers. Schizophr Res. 2005 Sep 1;77(1):43-58. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.12.019.
- Fisher M, Holland C, Subramaniam K, Vinogradov S. Neuroplasticity-based cognitive training in schizophrenia: an interim report on the effects 6 months later. Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jul;36(4):869-79. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn170. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
- Tarasenko M, Perez VB, Pianka ST, Vinogradov S, Braff DL, Swerdlow NR, Light GA. Measuring the capacity for auditory system plasticity: An examination of performance gains during initial exposure to auditory-targeted cognitive training in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016 Apr;172(1-3):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
- Chew ML, Mulsant BH, Pollock BG, Lehman ME, Greenspan A, Mahmoud RA, Kirshner MA, Sorisio DA, Bies RR, Gharabawi G. Anticholinergic activity of 107 medications commonly used by older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jul;56(7):1333-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01737.x. Epub 2008 May 26.
- Chou HH, Talledo JA, Lamb SN, Thompson WK, Swerdlow NR. Amphetamine effects on MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery performance in healthy adults. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 May;227(1):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2948-x. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
- Dinse HR, Ragert P, Pleger B, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M. Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization. Science. 2003 Jul 4;301(5629):91-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1085423.
- Goldberg TE, Bigelow LB, Weinberger DR, Daniel DG, Kleinman JE. Cognitive and behavioral effects of the coadministration of dextroamphetamine and haloperidol in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Jan;148(1):78-84. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.1.78.
- Hamidovic A, Dlugos A, Palmer AA, de Wit H. Catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met genotype modulates sustained attention in both the drug-free state and in response to amphetamine. Psychiatr Genet. 2010 Jun;20(3):85-92. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e32833a1f3c.
- Hamidovic A, Dlugos A, Palmer AA, de Wit H. Polymorphisms in dopamine transporter (SLC6A3) are associated with stimulant effects of D-amphetamine: an exploratory pharmacogenetic study using healthy volunteers. Behav Genet. 2010 Mar;40(2):255-61. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9331-7. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
- Keefe RS, Bilder RM, Davis SM, Harvey PD, Palmer BW, Gold JM, Meltzer HY, Green MF, Capuano G, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Davis CE, Hsiao JK, Lieberman JA; CATIE Investigators; Neurocognitive Working Group. Neurocognitive effects of antipsychotic medications in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the CATIE Trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;64(6):633-47. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.633.
- Kumari V, Premkumar P, Fannon D, Aasen I, Raghuvanshi S, Anilkumar AP, Antonova E, Peters ER, Kuipers E. Sensorimotor gating and clinical outcome following cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2012 Feb;134(2-3):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.11.020. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
- Mattay VS, Goldberg TE, Fera F, Hariri AR, Tessitore A, Egan MF, Kolachana B, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR. Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):6186-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931309100. Epub 2003 Apr 25.
- Light GA, Swerdlow NR. Neurophysiological biomarkers informing the clinical neuroscience of schizophrenia: mismatch negativity and prepulse inhibition of startle. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2014;21:293-314. doi: 10.1007/7854_2014_316.
- Pietrzak RH, Snyder PJ, Maruff P. Amphetamine-related improvement in executive function in patients with chronic schizophrenia is modulated by practice effects. Schizophr Res. 2010 Dec;124(1-3):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
- Pietrzak RH, Snyder PJ, Maruff P. Use of an acute challenge with d-amphetamine to model cognitive improvement in chronic schizophrenia. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2010 Jun-Jul;25(4):353-8. doi: 10.1002/hup.1118.
- Shilling PD, Saint Marie RL, Shoemaker JM, Swerdlow NR. Strain differences in the gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine: relationship to gene expression in nucleus accumbens signaling pathways. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr 15;63(8):748-58. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.10.015. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
- Swerdlow NR. Are we studying and treating schizophrenia correctly? Schizophr Res. 2011 Aug;130(1-3):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
- Swerdlow NR, Bhakta S, Chou HH, Talledo JA, Balvaneda B, Light GA. Memantine Effects On Sensorimotor Gating and Mismatch Negativity in Patients with Chronic Psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Jan;41(2):419-30. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.162. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
- Swerdlow NR, Light GA, Sprock J, Calkins ME, Green MF, Greenwood TA, Gur RE, Gur RC, Lazzeroni LC, Nuechterlein KH, Radant AD, Ray A, Seidman LJ, Siever LJ, Silverman JM, Stone WS, Sugar CA, Tsuang DW, Tsuang MT, Turetsky BI, Braff DL. Deficient prepulse inhibition in schizophrenia detected by the multi-site COGS. Schizophr Res. 2014 Feb;152(2-3):503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
- Talledo JA, Sutherland Owens AN, Schortinghuis T, Swerdlow NR. Amphetamine effects on startle gating in normal women and female rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 May;204(1):165-75. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1446-7. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
- Turetsky BI, Calkins ME, Light GA, Olincy A, Radant AD, Swerdlow NR. Neurophysiological endophenotypes of schizophrenia: the viability of selected candidate measures. Schizophr Bull. 2007 Jan;33(1):69-94. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl060. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
- Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ (2006) WRAT4: Wide Range Achievement Test professional manual, 4th edn Psychological Assessment Resources: Lutz, FL
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
- Schizophrenia
- Working memory
- Schizoaffective Disorder
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Central Nervous System Agents
- Mental Disorders
- Pharmacologic Actions
- Therapeutic Uses
- Neurocognition
- Dopamine Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Antiparkinson Agents
- Dextroamphetamine
- Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
- Excitatory Amino Acid Agents
- Prepulse inhibition
- Targeted Cognitive Training
- Anti-Dyskinesia Agents
- Pharmacologic Augmentation of Cognitive Therapies
- Sensory discrimination learning
- rs4680 polymorphism of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT)
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders
- Schizophrenia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Dopamine Agents
- Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors
- Central Nervous System Stimulants
- Sympathomimetics
- Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors
- Amphetamine
- Dextroamphetamine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5R01MH059803-15 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- Eyeblink Study (Other Identifier: UC San Diego)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.