Clinical Comparison of Vital Pulp Capping Restorative Protocols

December 9, 2022 updated by: Ana Bedran-Russo, University of Illinois at Chicago

Clinical Comparison of Vital Pulp Capping Restorative Protocols: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind, Prospective Study

At present, dentistry aims for conservative treatments with the goal of maintaining as much tooth structure as possible. Dental caries remains the most prevalent chronic disease worldwide; these lesions can progress rapidly and reach deeper areas of the tooth. The carious lesion is considered deep when it goes through the main tissues of the tooth, and it can affect the pulp tissue, where the nerve and nutrients of the tooth are located. There are many treatment options for deep carious lesions and they vary by the clinical scenario. Vital pulp therapy has become a fairly predictable alternative treatment to pulpectomy (root canal therapy). The goal of vital pulp capping therapies is to keep the pulp of the teeth vital to prevent further interventions such as root canal treatments and complex restorative work. There are two main clinical scenarios when treating these lesions, depending on the remaining dentin thickness between the carious lesion and the pulp: vital direct and indirect pulp capping. Direct and indirect vital pulp therapies are routinely performed using different clinical protocols. The clinical protocols are selected based on the remaining dentin (between the tooth preparation and pulp) and the restorative materials. There are few studies that evaluate pulp capping method in adult teeth (permanent dentition); many studies have investigated baby teeth (deciduous teeth). Routine therapies include the using of adhesive restorations with and without an intermediate layer of restorative material. Calcium hydroxide based cements have been used for pulp capping as an intermediate layer of restorative material. More recently a new intermediate layer of restorative material composed of resin-modified calcium silicate has been indicated for use on direct and indirect pulp capping. The aims of this study are to compare, over a period of 12 months, the post-operative sensitivity and pulp vitality of three indirect pulp capping protocols and two direct pulp capping protocol in vital teeth. This study will provide the necessary evidence to allow clinicians to select the best restorative protocol when treating deep carious lesions where indirect and direct pulp capping protocol are needed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized, controlled, double-blind, prospective study compares over a period of 12 months, the post-operative sensitivity and pulp vitality of three indirect pulp capping protocols (TheraCal, Bisco; Dycal, Caulk, and no liner). The study was approved by the University of Illinois internal review board (Protocol # 2014-1163). Potential subjects will be screened by one of 3 calibrated investigators through a brief interview and intraoral examination. The screening process includes a medical and dental history, demographics, current/concomitant medication, oral soft and hard tissue examination, 2 radiographs: one periapical and one bitewing, and a review of all inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria consist of adults in good general health between 18 and 64 years of age; with primary active carious lesions deep into the dentin (75% or more of carious dentin) of permanent teeth; absence of clinical symptoms of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain and lingering pain for more than 10 seconds after cold stimulus), and absence of periapical pathology, sinus tract, swelling or abnormal mobility. The outcomes measures are pain using visual analog pain scale (pain assessment form) and success rate (pulp vitality based on percussion, palpation, cold test, radiographic findings), collected at the screening visit, intervention day, 24 hours, 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up visits,

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • University of Illinois at Chicago College of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical inclusion criteria:

  • Adults in good general health between 18 and 64 years of age;
  • Active carious lesions deep into dentin (75% or more of dentin) involving occlusal/incisal and/or proximal surfaces of permanent teeth;
  • Absence of clinical symptoms of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain);
  • Absence of periapical pathology, sinus tract, swelling or abnormal mobility;
  • Restorable teeth.

Radiographic inclusion criteria:

  • Extension of carious lesion close to potential exposure upon excavation (within the D3 region - lesion extending 2/3 within dentin); with the presence of a well-defined radiodense zone between the lesion and the pulp;
  • Absence of periapical radiolucency;
  • Absence of thickening of the periodontal ligament,
  • Absence of resorptive defects.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non restorable teeth;
  • Teeth with:
  • Recent trauma (within 6 months);
  • Calcified root canals;
  • Periapical radiolucency;
  • Patients experiencing spontaneous moderate to severe pain;
  • Patients that are pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next year.
  • Patients taking analgesics, anti-inflammatory, or antidepressant medications;
  • Patients with orthodontic treatment;
  • Newly erupted teeth.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Indirect pulp capping therapy-Resin-modified calcium silicate - TheraCal
Resin modified calcium silicate-TheraCal (light curable)
Use of a dental restorative protocol using Resin-modified calcium silicate - TheraCal pulp capping restorative material
Active Comparator: Indirect pulp capping therapy- - Calcium hydroxide - Dycal
Calcium hydroxide - Dycal
Use of a dental restorative protocol using Calcium hydroxide - Dycal pulp capping restorative material
Active Comparator: Indirect pulp capping therapy-- Resin-based dentin bonding agent
Resin-based dentin bonding agent-Self etching adhesive
Use of a dental restorative protocol using resin-based dentin bonding system only
Active Comparator: Direct pulp capping therapy-Resin-modified calcium silicate - TheraCal
Resin modified calcium silicate-TheraCal (Light curable)
Use of a dental restorative protocol using Resin-modified calcium silicate - TheraCal pulp capping restorative material
Active Comparator: Direct pulp capping therapy-Resin-modified calcium silicate - Calcium hydroxide - Dycal
- Calcium hydroxide - Dycal
\Use of a dental restorative protocol using Calcium hydroxide - Dycal pulp capping restorative material

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success Rate Based on Pulp Vitality Tests (Vital/Non Vital)
Time Frame: 12 months

The success rate was based on 3 measures of pulp vitality that resulted in a diagnosis of vital or nonvital after 12-month follow-up:

Vital: (1) palpation ="negative" response. (2) percussion = "negative" response. (3) response to cold stimuli= positive [response time (seconds).

Non vital: (1) palpation ="positive" response. (2) percussion = "positive"" response. (3) response to cold stimuli= positive or delayed [response time (seconds) and lingering (seconds).

12 months
Pain Assessment Using Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) Scale.
Time Frame: 12 months
All the subjects will be asked to answer one question tracing a line on a hard copy visual analogue scale within a centimeters scale (0-10 cm) The measurement was quantitative (cm). The subject is asked to rate the level of pain by drawing a line in a 10 cm line, 0 being no pain, 10 being the worst pain.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

December 21, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deep Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Indirect Pulp capping-Resin-modified calcium silicate - TheraCal

Subscribe