Comparative Evaluation of an Electrical Impedance Device Versus Digital Radiography in Estimation of Remaining Dentin Thickness

December 6, 2023 updated by: Rawda Hesham Abd ElAziz

Comparative Evaluation of an Electrical Impedance Device Versus Digital Radiography in Estimation of Remaining Dentin Thickness in Carious Posterior Permanent Teeth (Diagnostic Accuracy Trial)

The research question was that in patients with carious posterior permanent teeth, would the electrical impedance device be as valid as digital radiography in estimation of remaining dentin thickness? The proposed hypothesis was null.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

67

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Cairo University
      • Cairo, Egypt, 11331
        • Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants eligible for this study were those aged from 18 y to 28 y,
  • willing to join the study
  • with clinically detectable occlusal or proximal carious vital permanent molar teeth with closed apex and healthy periodontal supporting.
  • The minimum extension of the carious cavity should be at least 1 mm in width to accommodate with the probe of the prepometer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Excluded participants were those with poor oral hygiene,
  • severe medical complications,
  • showing signs and symptoms of irreversible or necrotic pulp pathology also when the affected tooth was with extended buccal or lingual caries, extending clinically beyond ¼ dentin thickness or previously restored.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reference test: Radiographic examination
A digital periapical radiograph using paralleling technique was taken
Experimental: Index test: electrical impedance device, Prepometer
The electrical resistance of the residual dentine underneath each measurement point was determined between an electrode and the crown pulp (Prepometer, Hager & Werken, Duisburg, Germany). Assigning the electrical resistance of the dentin. high values are considered to represent more residual dentine than low values.
Other Names:
  • Prepometer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
validity of the two devices
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Level of agreement between the digital radiograph and the device in measurement of remaining dentin thickness
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients satisfaction between two devices
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
By visual analogue scale Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which is a 100 mm straight horizontal line with the left end indicating •not at all satisfied- and the right end "very satisfied.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rawda Hesham Abd ElAziz, PhD, Lecturer, Conservative dentistry department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deep Caries

Clinical Trials on Reference test: Digital Radiographic examination

3
Subscribe