Exercise Intolerance in Elderly Patients With HFpEF(Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) (SECRET-II)

Study of the Effects Caloric Restriction and Exercise Training in Patients With Heart Failure and a Normal Ejection Fraction

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of weight loss via hypocaloric diet (CR)and aerobic exercise (AT) compared to the effects of weight loss via hypocaloric diet (CR), aerobic training (AT)and resistance training (RT).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is the most common form of HF, is nearly unique to the older population, particularly older women, and is increasing in prevalence. Exercise intolerance, with severe exertional dyspnea and fatigue, is the primary manifestation of chronic HFPEF and is a major determinant of these patients' severely reduced quality of life (QOL). However, its pathophysiology is poorly understood and its optimal treatment remains undefined.

Our recent data and others' indicate that in older HFPEF patients, both increased adiposity and abnormalities in skeletal muscle are major contributors to exercise intolerance and potential therapeutic targets. Obesity is one of the strongest risk factors for HFPEF, and is a robust predictor of physical disability in older persons. The investigator recently reported that in HFPEF compared to age-matched controls, percent total and leg lean mass are significantly reduced and independently predict exercise capacity.

Using MRI and needle biopsy of the thigh muscle, the investigators found increased fat infiltration, reduced capillary density and percent type I oxidative fibers, and trends for reduced muscle mitochondrial mass and function. Reduced exercise capacity was related to each of these muscle abnormalities, supporting their important role in HFPEF.

Diet, with or without aerobic exercise, can increase exercise capacity and quality of life in older obese persons with a variety of disorders, but usually results in significant loss of skeletal muscle mass, which could potentially have adverse long term consequences. The purpose of this trial is to determine if addition of resistance training to diet plus aerobic exercise training can improve skeletal muscle mass and function in HFPEF.

Multiple lines of evidence and our preliminary data indicate that resistance training (RT) may be an ideal addition to CR+AT for HFPEF, since RT reliably increases muscle mass, quality, strength, and function, significantly more than AT, and can prevent nearly 50% of the muscle mass loss during CR.

Therefore, the primary aim of the proposed study is to conduct a randomized, single-blinded 20-week intervention trial of RT added to CR+AT in 84 overweight / obese (BMI greater than 28 kg/m2), older (age greater than 60 years) HFPEF patients to test the following primary hypothesis:

The addition of resistance training to CR+AT will improve exercise capacity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 60 years or older
  2. Ejection fraction ≥ 50%
  3. Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction ≥ grade 1
  4. BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2
  5. HF symptoms/ signs by cardiologist review, using NHANES HF Clinical Score >/= 3 or Rich et al. criteria for HF

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Valvular heart disease as the primary etiology of CHF (congestive heart failure)
  2. Significant change in cardiac medication or Heart Failure symptoms <6 weeks
  3. Hospitalization or urgent care visit <6 weeks
  4. Uncontrolled hypertension
  5. Uncontrolled diabetes
  6. Evidence of significant Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  7. Recent or debilitating stroke
  8. Cancer or other noncardiovascular conditions with life expectancy less than 2 years
  9. Significant anemia (<10 g/dL Hgb)
  10. Significant renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2)
  11. Pregnant or of child-bearing potential
  12. Psychiatric disease- uncontrolled major psychoses, depressions, dementia, or personality disorder
  13. Plans to leave area within the study period
  14. Refuses informed consent -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: dietary, and aerobic exercise

Intervention for diet-A hypocaloric diet will be developed to achieve a 2800 kcal/week deficit, which should produce about 0.4 kg (1 lb.) weight loss per week.

Intervention for aerobic exercise-Based on initial evaluations and the stress testing results, (HR, VO2, RPE) an individual exercise prescription will be developed for aerobic training.

hypocaloric diet individual prescription for aerobic training.
Active Comparator: dietary, aerobic and resistance training

Intervention for diet-A hypocaloric diet will be developed to achieve a 2800 kcal/week deficit, which should produce about 0.4 kg (1 lb.) weight loss per week.

Intervention for aerobic exercise-Based on initial evaluations and the stress testing results, (HR, VO2, RPE) an individual exercise prescription will be developed for aerobic training.

Intervention for resistance training- Additional weight resistant exercise will be added to this arm.

hypocaloric diet individual prescription for aerobic training.
hypocaloric diet individual exercise prescription for aerobic training individual exercise prescription for resistance training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Exercise Oxygen Consumption (VO2)
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO2) pre and post intervention
20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skeletal Muscle Mass
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Measure skeletal muscle mass in kg by DEXA analysis pre and post intervention.
20 weeks
Thigh Skeletal Muscle Mass
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Measure skeletal muscle mass by MRI analysis pre and post intervention.
20 weeks
Thigh Muscle Composition
Time Frame: 20 weeks
MRI skeletal muscle to intermuscular fat ratio
20 weeks
Muscle Strength
Time Frame: 20 weeks
maximal isokinetic knee extensor strength (Newton-meters, Nm) using an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex®)
20 weeks
Muscle Quality
Time Frame: 20 weeks
knee extensor strength to thigh muscle area assessed by MRI (Nm/cm2).
20 weeks
Quality of Life Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The KCCQ Overall Summary Summary Score is a heart failure disease-specific quality of life measure encompassing domains of physical limitation, HF symptoms, quality of life, and social limitation scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating better health status.
20 weeks
Quality of Life Measured by Short Form 36 Item Questionnaire (SF-36)
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment with 2 component scores (Physical Composite Score and Mental Composite Score) ranging 0-100 with higher scores indicating better health status.
20 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mitochondrial Content
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Porin citrate synthase pre and post intervention.
20 weeks
Mitochondrial Function
Time Frame: 20 weeks
respiratory control ratio and mitofusin 2 concentration.pre and post intervention.
20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 21, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00032364
  • R01AG018915 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on dietary, and aerobic exercise

3
Subscribe