Lactated Ringers With or Without Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (IND+LRPEP)

January 27, 2018 updated by: Shaffer R S Mok, The Cooper Health System

Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) - Induced Pancreatitis Using Aggressive Lactated Ringer's Infusion and/or Rectal Indomethacin

Post-ERCP pancreatitis is a well-known and sometimes life-threatening complication of ERCP. Both LR and rectal indomethacin have shown benefit in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. Despite this, no study to date has evaluated both of these measures for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. It is our hope to evaluate the combination of these two modalities for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with either modality alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly used diagnostic and therapeutic intervention used in Gastroenterology. At Cooper University Hospital (CUH), we perform approximately 700 ERCPs per year. A known complication of ERCP is post-ERCP pancreatitis. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis has been cited at anywhere from 2.6-3.5% of cases. Also, severe acute pancreatitis has been cited at rates of 0.32-0.4% and death 0.11%.

Recent literature has cited the use of several modalities useful in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. Among the modalities evaluated non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), specifically rectal indomethacin, have demonstrated benefit in preventing post-ERCP. In particular Elmunzer et al demonstrated a benefit in those with sphincter of oddi dysfunction (SOD) and those deemed "high risk" for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Other medication such at octreotoide and corticosteroid have shown mixed results.

Additionally, recent studies have demonstrated the use of lactated ringer's solution (LR) in lieu of normal saline (NS) in patient's with acute pancreatitis. Due to this thought process a recent study evaluated the use of LR in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. The results of this study showed that no patients who received aggressive LR hydration developed post-ERCP pancreatitis.

As rectal indomethacin and LR infusion appear to have the most definitive evidence for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis, it is our hope to evaluate the combination of these two therapies for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

This is a double blinded, randomized prospective cohort study involving 4 treatment groups undergoing ERCP.

All treatment arms shall receive consent, pre-procedural risk stratification, demographic data and pre-procedural liker pain scale. All subjects shall receive a study subject number and undergo randomization. All subjects also will receive post-procedural likert pain scale assessment, day 1 and 30 questioning. Treatment arms shall be separated into whether subjects are high risk or not defined in.

Time 0 (Visit 1):

Subjects undergo standard pre-procedural evaluation by nursing, anesthesia and consent for procedure/anesthesia.

The subject shall then be evaluated for study participation and subsequently consented if they desire to be part of the study. They may also undergo informed consent prior to the day of their procedure during their normal office visit. All subjects must have Liver function tests (LFTs), amylase and lipase levels drawn prior to their ERCP test. Subjects will be excluded from study participation if they have acute pancreatitis defined as;

The diagnosis of AP is most often established by the presence of 2 of the 3 following criteria:

(i) abdominal pain consistent with the disease (ii) serum amylase and / or lipase greater than three times the upper limit of normal, and / or (iii) characteristic findings from abdominal imaging

The day of their procedure, nursing shall then obtain intravenous peripheral access (standard for ERCP). Initial demographic data and risk factor data shall be obtained. Subjects shall then be randomized to one of the four study arms and given a study number randomly generated:

Pending which treatment arm the patient is enrolled into the subject shall then receive the above listed therapies and undergo their procedure.

Post-procedure the interventions performed during the ERCP shall be recorded and the patient will go through the standard recovery process. Post-procedure after recovery from anesthesia, the patients shall then be evaluated for the presence of pain after ERCP testing on the standard likert pain scale.

If the subject's pain has substantially increased from baseline, subjects shall then be admitted to the hospital and LFTs, a lipase and amylase level shall be drawn and abdominal imaging ordered if needed by the admitting physician (all the standard of care).

Time 1 Days (Visit 2 via phone):

Subjects shall be called 24 hours from ERCP to assess;

  1. Presence/absence of pain
  2. If pain, the severity
  3. Performance of amylase and lipase
  4. Whether admission, urgent care or emergency department visit did occur

Time 1-30 Days The investigator will await the subjects laboratory values and if > 3 times the upper limit of normal contact the subject via phone.

Time 30 Days (Visit 3 via phone):

Subjects shall be contacted via phone 30 days from ERCP to assess;

  1. Presence/absence of pain
  2. If pain, the severity
  3. Whether admission, urgent care or Emergency Department (ED) visit did occur to a healthcare facility
  4. Study summary

To detect a difference of 0.24 vs 0.05 a minimum of 48 per group would be needed (using p=0.05).

Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize demographic variables such as age, gender, race, length of stay, as well diagnosis and disease characteristics such as reasons for ERCP, disease intervention, pain,and outcome variables. Data tables will be generated for those variables with means, standard deviation (SD), medians, interquartile range (IQR), and confidence interval (CI). The Chi-Square test will be used to determine the main effect of treatment on ERCP induced pancreatitis. Nonparametric tests will be used to analyze categorical data while normally distributed data will be analyzed using ANOVA to look for treatment effect on other variables of interest.

Binary and Multinomial Logistic Regression will be used to examine predictors of outcome within treatments and across treatments by building interactions into the model (e.g. reasons for ERCP, intervention type). Data analysis will be performed using Systat version 13 and SPSS version 22. A p<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

192

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1 Subjects who are undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

  • Age > 18 years
  • Non-pregnant
  • Non-prisoners
  • Subjects who can sign informed consent
  • Serum Creatinine < 1.2 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
  • Subjects without renal failure (acute or chronic)
  • Subjects without congestive heart failure (ejection fraction < 40%)
  • Subjects without cirrhosis of the liver
  • Subjects without allergy to aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS)
  • Subjects not on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs NSAIDS prior to enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are not undergoing ERCP
  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners
  • Subjects lacking the capacity to consent for themselves
  • Serum Creatinine > 1.2 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
  • Subjects with renal failure (acute and chronic)
  • Subjects with congestive heart failure (ejection fraction < 40%)
  • Subjects with cirrhosis of the liver
  • Subjects with allergy to aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS)
  • Subjects with gastrointestinal hemorrhage
  • Subjects on chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs NSAIDS
  • Subjects with acute pancreatitis the day of their procedure (CITE 1-3)(APPENDIX 1)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: A (NS+Placebo)
Normal Saline (intravenous during procedure) + Placebo (100mg suppository per rectum prior to procedure )
standard IVF would include 0.9% normal saline (NS) solution used during all endoscopic procedures. 0.9% NS includes equal parts sodium and chloride.
Other Names:
  • NS
Placebo would be a suppository 50 mg x 2
Active Comparator: B (NS+IND)
Normal Saline (intravenous during procedure) + Indomethacin (100mg suppository per rectum prior to procedure )
standard IVF would include 0.9% normal saline (NS) solution used during all endoscopic procedures. 0.9% NS includes equal parts sodium and chloride.
Other Names:
  • NS
Indomethacin is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) which is commonly used to reduce inflammation caused by gout, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. It acts by blocking the cyclo-oxygenase 1 and 2 (COX) receptors. It has also been implicated to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis
Other Names:
  • IND
Active Comparator: C (LR+Placebo)
Lactated ringer's solution (1 Liter, intravenous prior to procedure) + Placebo (100mg suppository per rectum prior to procedure)
Placebo would be a suppository 50 mg x 2
Lactated ringer's solution (LR), is an intravenous fluid (IVF) used commonly during endoscopic procedures and operative procedures. It's composition is similar to that of humans including sodium, chloride, potassium, calcium and lactate. Studies have implicated the use of this fluid in pancreatitis treatment and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis
Other Names:
  • LR
Experimental: D (LR+IND)
Lactated ringer's solution (1 Liter, intravenous prior to procedure) + Indomethacin (100mg suppository per rectum prior to procedure)
Indomethacin is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) which is commonly used to reduce inflammation caused by gout, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. It acts by blocking the cyclo-oxygenase 1 and 2 (COX) receptors. It has also been implicated to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis
Other Names:
  • IND
Lactated ringer's solution (LR), is an intravenous fluid (IVF) used commonly during endoscopic procedures and operative procedures. It's composition is similar to that of humans including sodium, chloride, potassium, calcium and lactate. Studies have implicated the use of this fluid in pancreatitis treatment and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis
Other Names:
  • LR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Participants With Acute Pancreatitis After ERCP as Assessed by Worsening Abdominal Pain Plus Either Elevated Amylase or Lipase 3 x Upper Limit of Normal
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
amylase or lipase
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Acute Pancreatitis After ERCP as Assessed by Worsening Abdominal Pain Plus Imaging Suggestive of Acute Pancreatitis
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
Imaging may include Computer Tomography
30 days after ERCP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Participants With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) After ERCP as Assessed by ARDSnet Criterion (Below)
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
bilateral opacities on chest imaging not explained by other lung pathology, respiratory failure not explained by heart failure or volume, and overload and a pulmonary arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio under 300, PaO2/FiO2 ratio is the partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) After ERCP as Assessed by the SIRS Criterion (Below)
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
Heart rate > 90 beats per minutes
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) After ERCP as Assessed by the SIRS Criterion (Below)
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
Respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) After ERCP as Assessed by the SIRS Criterion (Below)
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
PaCO2 < 4.3 kilopascal (kPa) (32 mmHg)
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) After ERCP as Assessed by the SIRS Criterion (Below)
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
Temperature < 36°C(96.8°F) or > 38°C(100.4°F)
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) After ERCP as Assessed by the SIRS Criterion (Below)
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
white blood cell (WBC) count < 4000 cells/mm³ (4 x 109 cells/L)
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) After ERCP as Assessed by the SIRS Criterion (Below)
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
> 10% immature neutrophils (band forms).
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Sepsis After ERCP as Assessed by Infectious Source Defined by Positive Microbiology Culture
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
positive blood culture
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) After ERCP as Assessed by Elevated Creatinine Blood Test
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
creatinine > 1.5 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) After ERCP as Assessed by Elevated International Normalized Ratio (INR)
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
INR > 1.5
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Pancreatic Pseudocyst After ERCP as Assessed by Abdominal Imaging Suggestive of Pseudocyst
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
Imaging may include Computer Tomography
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Pancreatic Abscess After ERCP as Assessed by Abdominal Imaging Suggestive of Pancreatic Abscess
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
Imaging may include Computer Tomography
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Perforation After ERCP as Assessed by Abdominal Imaging Suggestive of Perforation
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
Imaging may include Computer Tomography
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants Who Undergo Surgery After ERCP, as Assessed by Surgical Operative Report
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Mortality After ERCP as Assessed by Medical Record Reporting
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants With Post-procedural Medical Care (ED Visit, Urgent Care, Hospitalization) as Assessed by Medical Record and Patients Self-reporting
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
30 days after ERCP
The Length of Stay (LOS) of Participants After ERCP if Medical Care is Sought as Assessed in Days
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
30 days after ERCP
The Number of Participants Who Were Readmitted After ERCP as Assessed by Medical Record and Patients Self-reporting
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP
30 days after ERCP

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shaffer RS Mok, MD, MBS, The Cooper Health System

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 29, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis

Clinical Trials on Normal Saline

3
Subscribe