The Impact of Lenses on Musculoskeletal and Visual Complaints in VDU Workers With Neck Complaints

December 5, 2022 updated by: University Ghent

The Impact of Wearing VDU Lenses Versus Progressive Lenses on Musculoskeletal and Visual Complaints in VDU Workers With Work Related Neck Complaints: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of wearing visual display units (VDU) lenses versus progressive lenses on musculoskeletal and visual complaints in VDU workers with work related neck complaints. This will be evaluated by means of questionnaires (Neck Disability Index and Visual Fatigue Questionnaire), muscle tone, elasticity and stiffness, pressure pain threshold and 2D video analysis of head posture during a VDU task.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The use of visual display units (VDU) is often accompanied by physical complaints of the neck, shoulder, forearm and hand, especially in people who make extensive use of computers at work. Besides this, VDU operators also experience eye discomfort and vision problems when working with the computer for a long period.

With the increase of computer use, VDU glasses were developed. They provide a clear vision of the intermediate zone at a distance of approximately 70 centimeters, which is closer than distant vision at a distance of more than 2 meters (e.g. driving), but further than near vision at a distance of 40 centimeters (e.g. reading), so the computer screen is seen clear without the need for excessive focusing effort or bad postures. Progressive lenses have some lens power for this intermediate zone as well, but this zone might not be large enough for comfortable and ergonomic computer work. VDU glasses are often progressive glasses as well, so they can be used to read and see things beyond the computer screen clear during computer work.

The research question of this study is "What is the impact of wearing progressive VDU lenses versus progressive lenses, for six months, on both musculoskeletal and visual complaints in VDU workers with work related neck complaints ?"

To find an answer to this question, 40 VDU workers (men and women) with work related neck/shoulder complaints, were recruited from a bank office where they perform predominantly VDU work. All participants will receive information and have to sign an informed consent form.

A questionnaire concerning visual and musculoskeletal complaints, in which the Neck Disability Index (NDI) Questionnaire had to be completed at the beginning of the experiment. Participants were tested with their old glasses in a landscape office while performing a 20 minute VDU task. Before and after the task, viscoelastic properties (MyotonPRO®) of the trapezius muscle and the PPT (WagnerTM FDX 50 hand-held pressure algometer) of the trapezius muscle, the levator scapulae muscle and the infraspinatus muscle were measured. A 2D video analysis was performed during the task.The Forward Head Angle (FHA) and the Forward Shoulder Angle (FSA) was measured afterwards. After this, participants were asked to fill out a short questionnaire, in which the Visual Fatigue Questionnaire was included, every two weeks during two months. On the 15th of June, 2015 the participants received new glasses and were asked to wear these for six months during computer work. During this period the same short questionnaire had to be filled out every two weeks. The test procedure will be repeated with the new glasses after six months of wearing these. A shorter version of the first questionnaire will be completed at the end of the experiment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Minimum 4 hours a day and 20 hours a week of VDU work
  • Work related neck/shoulder complaints
  • Difference in spectacle correction for presbyopia and myopia of minimum 1.5 dioptres

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active eye disease that can't be corrected with eyeglasses
  • Drugs that strongly influence eye or muscle function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VDU lenses
VDU lenses provide a clear vision of the intermediate zone at a distance of approximately 70 centimeters, which is closer than distant vision at a distance of more than 2 meters (e.g. driving), but further than near vision at a distance of 40 centimeters (e.g. reading), so the computer screen is seen clear without the need for excessive focusing effort or bad postures. In this study Zeiss® Officelens Plus lenses with a Silhouette® frame were used.
The treatment group (n=22) was given progressive VDU glasses (Zeiss® Officelens Plus), specially designed for VDU work. The participants were asked to wear their new glasses for six months during computer work.
Active Comparator: Progressive lenses
Progressive lenses or multifocal lenses provide a continuous range of focal power between near and far distances.Progressive lenses have some lens power for the intermediate zone as well, but this zone might not be large enough for comfortable and ergonomic computer work. In this study Zeiss® Multifocal Precision Plus lenses with a Silhouette® frame were used.
The comparison group (n=18) was given progressive glasses (Zeiss® Multifocal Precision Plus). The participants were asked to wear their new glasses for six months during computer work.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in functionality using the Neck disability index (NDI)
Time Frame: At baseline and six months
The NDI consists of ten questions concerning pain and daily living activities such as lifting, reading, driving, etc. and the maximum score is 50.
At baseline and six months
Change in visual complaints using the Visual Fatigue Questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline and six months
The questionnaire consists of 15 questions which have to be answered on a visual analogue scale ranging from zero to ten. It enquires eye strain, impaired vision, impaired eye surface and problems of the outside of the eyes, headache for example. The maximum score is 10.
At baseline and six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in muscle elasticity by using the MyotonPRO® device
Time Frame: At baseline and six months
The MyotonPRO® is a digital device that measures the elasticity (logarithmic decrement) of a muscle.
At baseline and six months
Change in muscle stiffness by using the MyotonPRO® device
Time Frame: At baseline and six months
The MyotonPRO® is a digital device that measures muscle stiffness, this is expressed in N/m.
At baseline and six months
Change in muscle tone by using the MyotonPRO® device
Time Frame: At baseline and six months
The MyotonPRO® is a digital device that measures muscle tone, this is expressed in Hz
At baseline and six months
Change in pressure pain threshold by using the WagnerTM FDX 50 hand-held pressure algometer
Time Frame: At baseline and six months
The WagnerTM FDX 50 hand-held pressure algometer is a digital device that measures the point at which pressure (N) becomes unpleasant, also known as the pressure pain threshold (PPT).
At baseline and six months
Change in head posture during a VDU task by means of 2D video analysis
Time Frame: At baseline and six months
A 2D video analysis of the head posture was performed during a VDU task using a Logitech® webcam with a Zeiss® Tessar HD 1080p lens and MaxTRAQ and MaxMATE software.
At baseline and six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Barbara Cagnie, PhD, University Ghent

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20150115

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on VDU lenses (Zeiss® Officelens Plus)

Subscribe