Decreasing Postoperative Pain Following Endometrial Ablation

August 25, 2019 updated by: Jordan Klebanoff, Christiana Care Health Services

Decreasing Postoperative Pain Following Endometrial Ablation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To determine whether paracervical injection of long acting local anesthesia decreases postoperative pain following endometrial ablation under general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Destruction of the endometrial lining to control bothersome uterine bleeding has been implemented since 1937. Currently there are various different 'second generation' energy sources to avert such bleeding, five of which are now approved in the United States. These 5 second generation devices include: Thermachoice/Cavaterm, which use high temperature fluid within a balloon; Microsulis, which applies microwaves; Novasure, which uses bipolar energy; Hydrothermablator, which uses free fluid at high temperatures; ELITT, which uses laser thermotherapy; and HerOption, which uses cryoablation. Patient selection for endometrial ablation is crucial, as it is intended for premenopausal women with normal uterine cavities and no desire for future fertility that are affected by heavy menstrual bleeding. Since the introduction of the initial 'second generation' device in 1997 these modalities have overtaken the industry mostly due to their ease of use and shorter operative times. Regardless, a Cochrane review finds insufficient evidence to prove superiority of these newer modalities over the traditional 'gold standard' resectoscopic technique.

Endometrial ablation has been demonstrated in a variety of settings including outpatient surgical centers as well as physician's offices. Evidence suggests that microwave endometrial ablation under local anesthesia is a safe and acceptable practice. Very often, when endometrial ablation is performed as an outpatient procedure, patients are pre-medicated and then receive a paracervical injection of local anesthesia to control pain intraoperatively. When endometrial ablations are performed as an outpatient procedure through a surgical center, a variety of anesthesia techniques are employed depending on the infrastructure and human and institutional resources available. These techniques may vary from conscious sedation to general anesthesia, all of which have been proven to be acceptable methods.

In this center endometrial ablations are performed as an outpatient procedure under general anesthesia with a variety of induction techniques and intraoperative pain management practices. According to physician preference, patients may receive an additional paracervical injection of local anesthetic before the procedure, immediately after, or not at all. To date, there are no studies evaluating the efficacy of local anesthetic in addition to general anesthesia for patients receiving endometrial ablation to guide physician practice. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of local anesthetic, in addition to general anesthesia, in our large, community-based patient population, in meaningfully decreasing postoperative pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19713
        • Christiana Care Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Premenopausal women
  • English as primary language
  • undergoing outpatient endometrial ablation at the Christiana Hospital Surgical Center
  • Indication of menorrhagia
  • Inication of abnormal uterine bleeding
  • Indication of thickened endometrium.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known malignancy
  • weight less than 50 Kg
  • amide allergy
  • history of chronic pain
  • cardiac arrhythmia
  • dilaudid/codeine allergy
  • history of opioid use
  • inability to take opioids by mouth
  • uterine anomaly
  • previous endometrial ablation
  • primary language other than English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment
Women undergoing endometrial ablation that meet the eligibility criterial will receive a standardized paracervical injection of Bupivacaine 20 mL 0.25% at the completion of the procedure.
Paracervical injection of 20 mL 0.25% Bupivacaine at the completion of the procedure
Other Names:
  • Marcaine, Sensorcaine
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control
Women undergoing endometrial ablation that meet the eligibility criterial will receive an equal volume standardized paracervical injection of Normal Saline at the completion of the procedure.
Equal volume injection of normal saline with the same paracervical technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Score
Time Frame: Immediate postoperatively through 8 hours post operation.

Pain will be assessed using a 10 point visual analog scale. On the scale 0 represented no pain and 10 represented the highest pain level. Eligibility for analgesia was available for patients who reported pain higher than 5 out of 10 on the scale.

Pain levels were assessed by trained nursing staff blinded to the study. Lower numbers on the 10 point scale represented a positive outcome.

Patients

Immediate postoperatively through 8 hours post operation.
Intraoperative Total Blood Loss
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Amount of operative blood lost measured in milliliters
Intraoperative
Remaining Tylenol Tablets With Codeine Not Taken at the End of Day 1 Following Discharge
Time Frame: Postoperative
All patients were given 10 tablets of Tylenol with codeine upon discharge for pain. This Outcome measure details the remaining number of tablets after day 1.
Postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of Intraoperative Complication
Time Frame: During Surgery
This represents any unanticipated complication related to the endometrial ablation.
During Surgery
Postoperative Complication
Time Frame: 1 Day Postoperative
Any unanticipated complication related to the endometrial ablation.
1 Day Postoperative
Postoperative Opioid Administered Following the Procedure But Prior to Discharge.
Time Frame: Predischarge from hospital
Narcotic medications administered in the recovery area before the patient was discharged from the Surgicenter.
Predischarge from hospital
Postoperative Toradol
Time Frame: Postoperative
Data was collected on whether or not the patient received Toradol following the endometrial ablation. Toradol is a non-narcotic pain medication.
Postoperative
Postoperative Anti-emetic
Time Frame: Postoperative
Data was collected on any nausea medicine administered following the endometrial ablation.
Postoperative
Time Between Recovery Initiation and Discharge
Time Frame: hours between recovery initiation and discharge
Time between arrival to the recovery room after surgery and discharge to home
hours between recovery initiation and discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jordan Klebanoff, MD, Christiana Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe