Disulfiram and Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Expansion Cohort Study of Disulfiram and Chemotherapy in Pancreas Cancer Patients

This partially randomized phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of disulfiram when given together with chemotherapy in treating patients with a solid tumor that does not respond to treatment (refractory) or pancreatic cancer that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic) and to compare whether disulfiram and chemotherapy may reduce tumor induced muscle loss. Weight loss occurs in pancreatic cancer patients and is common in a multitude of other cancers. Patients with metastatic cancer and weight loss sometimes are not able to receive treatment due to physical weakness or debility. Disulfiram is a potential inhibitor of muscle degradation and may reduce tumor induced muscle wasting. Disulfiram may also help chemotherapy work better by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drug. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving chemotherapy with or without disulfiram is a better treatment for refractory solid tumors or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: Refractory Malignant Solid Neoplasm; Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8; Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis; Drug: Gemcitabine Hydrochloride; Drug: Chemotherapy; Drug: Disulfiram

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of disulfiram and gemcitabine (gemcitabine hydrochloride) in unresectable solid tumor cancer patients (Cohort 1).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To describe the adverse event profile associated with this combination of disulfiram and chemotherapy (Cohort 2).

II. To describe changes in muscle area at the L3 level from baseline to 28 to 60 days from the baseline computed tomography (CT) scan in patients treated with disulfiram/chemotherapy and with placebo/chemotherapy (Cohort 2).

III. To describe changes in fist-grip strength from baseline to 28 to 35 days of treatment with disulfiram/gemcitabine and with placebo/chemotherapy (Cohort 2).

IV. To describe overall survival of pancreas cancer patients who disulfiram/chemotherapy or placebo/chemotherapy (Cohort 2).

V. To estimate the response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria around 1 month post-treatment in patients who receive disulfiram/chemotherapy and placebo/chemotherapy (Cohort 2).

CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVE:

I. To assess the effect of disulfiram and chemotherapy on the ubiquitin proteasome and autophagy pathways within muscle, as assessed by means of muscle biopsies performed at baseline and after 28 to 35 days of treatment (Cohort 2) (this is for Mayo only patients and can be waived upon permission from the principal investigator [PI]).

OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study of disulfiram.

COHORT I: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and disulfiram orally (PO) on days 1-28 or days 1-35.

COHORT II: Patients receive chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating oncologist and disulfiram PO on days 1-28 or days 1-35.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 16
• Phase: Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Minnesota
    • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
      • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    • Thief River Falls, Minnesota, United States, 56701
      • Sanford Thief River Falls Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Cohort 1 (dose escalation): histologic or cytologic proof of any solid tumor that is incurable with no standard therapy that is likely to make a major impact on clinical outcomes
• Cohort 2 (MTD) only: metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease is allowed
• Cohort 2 (MTD) only: Patient is thought to be a short- or long-term candidate for chemotherapy in the opinion of the treating oncologist
• Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >= 1500/mm^3 (obtained =< 7 days prior to registration)
• Platelet >= 100,000/ mm^3 (obtained =< 7 days prior to registration)
• Total bilirubin =< 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (obtained =< 7 days prior to registration)
• Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]) =< 3 x ULN (obtained =< 7 days prior to registration)
• Creatinine =< 1.5 x ULN (obtained =< 7 days prior to registration)
• Hemoglobin >= 9.0 g/dL (obtained =< 7 days prior to registration)
• Cohort 2 (MTD) only: prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR) =< 1.5 x ULN (only if muscle biopsy has not been waived, does not apply to non-Mayo sites that will not be conducting biopsies) (obtained =< 7 days prior to registration)
• Ability to provide written informed consent
• Life expectancy >= 12 weeks
• Cohort 2 (MTD) only: patient willing to undergo muscle biopsies at baseline and after 28 to 35 days of disulfiram/chemotherapy as required by the protocol unless the muscle biopsy has been waived after discussion with the principal investigator (PI); muscle biopsies will not be required at non-Mayo Clinic sites
• Cohort 2 (MTD) only: patient willing to have paraffin-embedded slides of the primary pancreas tumor or metastatic site, if available, sent to Mayo investigators for this study
• For women of childbearing potential only: negative urine or serum pregnancy test done =< 7 days prior to registration
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0, 1 or 2
• Able to swallow or have medication administered through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) and absorb the medication
• Patient willing to complete a medication diary

• Patient agrees to use acceptable form of contraception during the study and for up to 30 days after last study drug dose if female partner is of childbearing potential

  • Acceptable forms of contraception:

    • Latex condom (always used with spermicide)
    • Diaphragm (always used with spermicide)
    • Cervical cap (always used with spermicide)

  • Acceptable forms of secondary contraception, when used along with a barrier method:

    • Hormonal contraception methods, including pills, patches, rings, or injections except progestin-only containing pills (i.e. "Mini-pill")
    • Tubal ligation
    • Partner's vasectomy
    • Intrauterine device (non-progesterone T)
    • Vaginal sponge (containing spermicide)

  • Other acceptable forms:

    • 100% commitment to abstinence

  • Unacceptable forms of contraception for women of childbearing potential:

    • Oral contraception containing progestins only
    • Intrauterine device (IUD) progesterone T
    • Female condom
    • Natural family planning (rhythm method) or breastfeeding
    • Fertility awareness
    • Withdrawal
    • Cervical shield

Exclusion Criteria:

• Known standard therapy for the patient's disease that is potentially curative
• Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, including localized infections, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
• Untreated brain metastases

• Any of the following:

  • Pregnant women
  • Nursing women This study involves an investigational agent whose genotoxic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects on the developing fetus and newborn are unknown.
• Other concurrent chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, any ancillary therapy considered investigational (utilized for a non-Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-approved indication and in the context of a research investigation) or receiving any other investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm
• Baseline of grade 2 or worse peripheral sensory neuropathy
• Receiving phenytoin
• Unable to abstain from alcohol for the duration of the study

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort I (gemcitabine hydrochloride and disulfiram); Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and disulfiram PO on days 1-28 or days 1-35.	Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis; Correlative studies; Drug: Gemcitabine Hydrochloride; Given IV; Other Names: Gemzar; dFdCyd; Difluorodeoxycytidine Hydrochloride; FF 10832; FF-10832; FF10832; Gemcitabine HCI; LY-188011; LY188011; Drug: Disulfiram; Given PO; Other Names: Antabuse; DS; Teturamin; TTD; Tetraethylthioperoxydicarbonic Diamide
Experimental: Cohort II (chemotherapy and disulfiram); Patients receive chemotherapy at the discretion of the treating oncologist and disulfiram PO on days 1-28 or days 1-35.	Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis; Correlative studies; Drug: Chemotherapy; Other Names: Chemo; Chemotherapy (NOS); Chemotherapy, Cancer, General; Drug: Disulfiram; Given PO; Other Names: Antabuse; DS; Teturamin; TTD; Tetraethylthioperoxydicarbonic Diamide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) (Cohort I)	MTD is defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients (at least 2 of a maximum of 6 new patients).	28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Adverse events profile (Cohort I and II)	The number and severity of all adverse events (overall, by dose-level, and by tumor group) will be tabulated and summarized in this patient population. The grade 3+ adverse events will also be described and summarized in a similar fashion. This will provide an indication of the level of tolerance for this treatment combination in this patient group.	Up to 30 days post-treatment
Toxicity profile defined as adverse events that are classified as either possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment (Cohorts I and II)	Non-hematologic toxicities will be evaluated via the ordinal Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) standard toxicity grading. Hematologic toxicity measures of thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and leukopenia will be assessed using continuous variables as the outcome measures (primarily nadir) as well as categorization via CTC standard toxicity grading. Overall toxicity incidence as well as toxicity profiles by dose level, patient and tumor site will be explored and summarized. Frequency distributions, graphical techniques and other descriptive measures will form the basis of these analyses.	Up to 30 days post-treatment
Overall survival (OS) (Cohort I and II)	OS will be summarized descriptively using the Kaplan-Meier estimate up to 3 years of follow-up in all alive patients.	From registration until death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
Change in muscle area at the L3 level using a computed tomography (CT) scan (Cohort II)	Changes will be described using summary statistics and graphical techniques. A grayscale pixel histogram of the remaining muscle in the image will be constructed and summed. The number of pixels will then be converted to an area measurement in squared centimeters. All measurements and calculations for each image will be undertaken by two independent study personnel, and the average will be used in the analyses. A Wilcoxon rank sum test may be used as appropriate to compare percent changes of biomarkers between the muscle clinical responders and the non-responders based on CT scan measurements of muscle.	Baseline to day 28
Response rate (Cohort II)	Response rate will be assessed using standard Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.	At 1 month post-treatment
Change in muscle area at the L3 level using a computed tomography scan (Cohort II)	Changes will be described using summary statistics and graphical techniques. A grayscale pixel histogram of the remaining muscle in the image will be constructed and summed. The number of pixels will then be converted to an area measurement in squared centimeters. All measurements and calculations for each image will be undertaken by two independent study personnel, and the average will be used in the analyses. A Wilcoxon rank sum test may be used as appropriate to compare percent changes of biomarkers between the muscle clinical responders and the non-responders based on CT scan measurements of muscle.	Baseline to day 35
Changes in fist-grip strength as measured by hand dynamometer (Cohort II)	Changes will be described using summary statistics and graphical techniques. Patients will use 3 successive tries, and the average value will be used.	Baseline to day 28
Changes in fist-grip strength as measured by hand dynamometer (Cohort II)	Changes will be described using summary statistics and graphical techniques. Patients will use 3 successive tries, and the average value will be used.	Baseline to day 35

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in muscle protein expression level of total and phosphorylated (phosph)-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) via immunohistochemistry	Changes will be made at baseline and 28 to 35 days.	Baseline to up to 35 days
Changes in muscle messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels via real-time polymerase chain reaction	Changes in mRNA transcripts of the muscle ubiquitin proteasome system (atrogin and muscle-specific RING finger protein 1) and STAT3 target genes (suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 and early growth response 1) will be made at baseline and 28 to 35 days.	Baseline to up to 35 days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Mayo Clinic
• Collaborators: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Aminah Jatoi, M.D., Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): February 25, 2016
• Primary Completion (Estimated): December 1, 2024
• Study Completion (Estimated): May 5, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 29, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 29, 2016
• First Posted (Estimated): February 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): February 12, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 8, 2024
• Last Verified: February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Digestive System Diseases; Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Endocrine System Diseases; Digestive System Neoplasms; Endocrine Gland Neoplasms; Pancreatic Diseases; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Enzyme Inhibitors; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antimetabolites; Antineoplastic Agents; Alcohol Deterrents; Acetaldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitors; Disulfiram; Gemcitabine
• Other Study ID Numbers: MC1512 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic in Rochester); P30CA015083 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract); NCI-2016-00007 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program)); 15-003194 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board); R01CA195473 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)