Vitamin D Status in Patients With Severe Sepsis (ViDISS)

April 30, 2021 updated by: Massachusetts General Hospital

Vitamin D Status in Patients With Severe Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Sepsis is a clinical entity that complicates infection. Without early recognition and timely management, it can rapidly progress to severe sepsis, septic shock, and culminate in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Forty to 70% of septic patients have low vitamin D status, yet little is known about the impact of vitamin D3 (vitD3) supplementation in this patient population. As such, the investigators propose a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the hypothesis that early, rapid correction of low vitamin D status, as an adjunct to established treatment guidelines, will improve clinical outcomes and measurably alter immune profile in patients with severe sepsis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sepsis is a clinical entity that complicates infections [1]. Without early recognition and timely management, it can rapidly progress to severe sepsis, septic shock, and culminate in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The incidence of severe sepsis is between 300 to 1000 cases per 100,000 persons [2] and is projected to increase annually due to an aging population, increasing burden of chronic disease, and greater use of invasive procedures, chemotherapy, and immunosuppressive agents [3]. Severe sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in critically ill patients, with healthcare costs exceeding $16 billion annually [4]. Despite evolving clinical guidelines for sepsis [5-7], and intense research, only a modest reduction in case fatality rates has been documented over the last two decades [8]. Aside from early administration of antibiotics, there is no effective stand-alone or adjuvant pharmacological intervention to improve survival in patients with severe sepsis.

The degree of immune dysfunction precipitated by an inciting infection is thought to correlate with the severity of sepsis. Recently, key cells of the immune system were shown to express the vitamin D receptor (VDR) [9]. Additionally, macrophages and neutrophils activated through VDR up-regulate expression of endogenous antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that are active against a broad spectrum of infectious agents [10]. AMPs, influenced by vitamin D status, likely represent an important first-line of defense against microbial invasion. While circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) is the most abundant vitamin D metabolite [11], under normal circumstances, 85-90% of 25OHD is tightly bound to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and is unavailable to activate innate immune responses during acute stress [12]. The remaining 10-15% is more readily bioavailable (b25OHD), and is composed of the free and albumin-bound components of 25OHD. Fluid loading, albumin wasting, and increased DBP expression during critical illness may affect 25OHD homeostasis [13].

Low vitamin D status (25OHD <20ng/mL) is associated with increased mortality in critical illness [14]. Forty to 70% of septic patients have low vitamin D status [15-17], yet little is known about the impact of vitamin D3 (vitD3) supplementation in this patient population. As such, the investigators propose a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the hypothesis that early, rapid correction of low vitamin D status, as an adjunct to established treatment guidelines, will improve clinical outcomes and measurably alter immune profile in patients with severe sepsis. Patients will be assigned to a single dose of vitD3 (400,000 IU) or placebo (n=300/arm) within 24 hours of new-onset severe sepsis, followed by weekly doses of vitD3 (25,000 IU) or placebo, respectively, up to 90 days to assess clinical outcomes and key biomarkers.

AIM 1: To determine if early administration of vitD3 (vs placebo) improves clinical outcomes in patients with low vitamin D status and severe sepsis. Hypothesis 1a: Early vitD3 decreases 90-day mortality after onset of severe sepsis (Primary Outcome). Hypothesis 1b: Early vitD3 decreases sequential organ failure assessment scores in the first 5 days after onset of severe sepsis. Hypothesis 1c: Early vitD3 decreases non-home discharge rate in those who survive severe sepsis.

AIM 2: To determine if early administration of vitD3 (vs placebo) modulates b25OHD, AMPs, and key cytokines in patients with low vitamin D status and severe sepsis. Hypothesis 2a: Early vitD3 increases b25OHD in the first 5 days after the onset of severe sepsis. Hypothesis 2b: Early vitD3 increases expression of AMPs, cathelicidin (LL-37) and β-defensin (hBD-2). Hypothesis 2c: Early vitD3 decreases pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-1β, IL-6) and increases anti-immunoparalytic cytokine (IL-10, IFN-γ) expression.

Severe sepsis is a significant public health problem with limited treatment options. A 2010 NIH workshop on sepsis identified deep gaps in understanding innate host immune responses in sepsis and emphasized the need for novel therapies [18]. The proposed trial is well powered to investigate whether immunomodulation with vitD3 improves survival after severe sepsis. By optimizing endogenous host responses to infection, the investigators anticipate that vitD3 supplementation will augment the life-saving impact of current therapies for severe sepsis. Moreover, the investigators will investigate several vitamin D-related biomarkers, which may identify future therapeutic targets. The trial will be performed by a highly-experienced team that includes experts in vitamin D, sepsis, critical care, and clinical trials; they have successfully carried out several clinical studies of vitamin D in critically ill patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 to <80 years
  • Admitted to 1 of 4 participating ICUs
  • Meet criteria for new-onset severe sepsis* within past 12 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥80 years
  • Not anticipated to survive ≥48 hours
  • Inability to obtain informed consent from patient/suitable proxy within 22 hours of new-onset severe sepsis
  • Comfort measures, hospice, or palliative care status
  • Documented adverse reaction to vitamin D supplementation
  • Inability to tolerate enteral feeds/medications
  • Renal stones within past year
  • Hypercalcemia within past year
  • Baseline serum calcium ≥10.5 mg/dL
  • Established diagnosis of medical condition associated with high risk of hypercalcemia (e.g. metastatic cancer, sarcoidosis, multiple myeloma, primary hyperparathyroidism)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: vitamin D3
Patients will be given single dose of vitamin D3 within 24 hours of new-onset severe sepsis, followed by weekly doses of vitD3 (25,000 IU) up to 90 days to assess clinical outcomes and key biomarkers.
Patients will be given 400,000 IU of vitamin D3 within 24 hours of severe sepsis onset followed by weekly doses of 25,000 IU until 90 days or death, whichever comes first.
Other Names:
  • cholecalciferol
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Patients will be given placebo intervention within 24 hours of new onset severe sepsis followed by or placebo for up to 90 days to assess clinical outcomes and key biomarkers.
Patients will be given placebo within 24 hours of severe sepsis onset followed by weekly doses of placebo until 90 days or death, whichever comes first.
Other Names:
  • sugar pill, sham comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90 day mortality
Time Frame: 90 day mortality
90 day mortality will be assessed in patients included in the study
90 day mortality

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum b25OHD: Baseline serum b25OHD and serum b25OHD after intervention, until hospital day 5
Time Frame: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
b25 OHD will be measured in the first 5 days after the onset of severe sepsis
24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
Serum measurement of AMPs, cathelicidin, and B-defensin: Baseline serum AMPs, cathelicidin, and B-defensin and AMPs, cathelicidin, and B-defensin after intervention, until hospital day 5
Time Frame: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
AMPs, Cathelicidin and B-defensin will be measured in the first 5 days after the onset of severe sepsis
24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
Serum measurement of cytokines: Baseline serum cytokines and serum cytokines after intervention, until hospital day 5
Time Frame: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
IL1B, IL-6, IL-10 and IFN-y will be measured in the first 5 days after the onset of severe sepsis
24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
sequential organ failure assessment scores in the first 5 day after severe sepsis onset
Time Frame: 24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5
SOFA scores will be taken within the first 5 days of onset of severe sepsis in patients enrolled
24h of severe sepsis onset until hospital day 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sadeq A Quraishi, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on vitamin D3

3
Subscribe